negative1 said:
sample artwork, readme, what it will include:
===================================
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/591842/#TopicPost591842
Did anyone save copies of that sample artwork?
That's if there's any opening crawl at all.
That... didn't feel like Star Wars, actually.
I'm deeply sorry, I've just noticed a spelling defect in the Star Wars cover. I've fixed it now, but if I've sent a link to you, you'll have to reprint it again. My apologies for the inconvenience.
Knowing our luck, it'll be the Special Editions. They don't even call it Star Wars, they call it A New Hope! That's all you need to know!
fmalover said:
After watching your colour matchings of I can say one problem with the special editions is that they altered the look of the OT to make them look like mid-90s movies to appear more "contemporary" instead of preserving the look of the late 70s-early 80s films they actually are.
This is probably true. In fact I don't think I would've guessed that they actually came from the 70s/80s if the SEs were the first Star Wars movies I watched!
Geez, I hope he's alright! :( What was the surgery for anyway?
Impressive! Is there a version for the Philosopher's Stone?
It's a sacrilege that they'd withold it though - it inspired Splash Mountain, did it not!?
Oh, is that where it came from? Thanks for telling me!
Strange that they wouldn't want it released. What's stopping them?
Is there a possibility of this tool being able to export LUTs sometime soon?
Sent!
Sent.
SilverWook said:
I think the Lovecraft estate was consulted on this one. Only inflicted on the U.K.
I may have had one of those as a kid.
....I was a sick little puppy.
Bring back Jason Wingreen!
Hal 9000 said:
kaarma33 said:
Wow. That's...
I'm stoked!!!
Apart from the 6.1 track, are there any other audio tracks being planned?
My excitement intensifies!
Trust me, they can't sink any lower than Darth Vader's Big NO in ROTJ.
So when it comes down to it, there is no solution to the problem.
crissrudd4554 said:
I feel I'll probably just be repeating myself here 'cause I've pretty much said all this or things to the effect before but here it goes. As most of you probably know I'm an OOT supporter. Does this mean I hate the SE's?? I dont like them but I dont hate them. I respect their existence and why Lucas did them. Thats all though. My problem as with many is that the OOT is no longer properly available. Not just because some like myself are accustomed to those versions but because they are iconic films that are pivotal to the eras they came out of. Same about the SE's. Regardless of what was good or bad about them, the SE's are products of their time. Now of course you got nit picky fans who pick one version of the film and solely want that version available but me I have no objection to both versions being available. At least Lucas' 'vision' is represented while old school fans get the version they want. But it isnt that way sadly. To those who like the SE's thats fine but me it will never be anything more than a 'what if???' version of SW. The originals are the real deal because even though they were in Lucas' mind 'unfinished' they were iconic and technically speaking were 'completed' with the technology that was achievable at the time.
Seconded. I'd respect the SEs more if they were presented alongside the originals!
The resemblance is uncanny.
slask said:
fandom's vision is not lazy, it's stuck in time, and that's worse.
But don't you see? Movies don't change with the times. They can't! You can't just put new stuff on top of a 20-year-old movie and hope people will just roll with it, that's not how it works! (Cleaning up matte lines is an exception, to a degree.)
Is it able to remove the blue tint of Hoth from the DVDs?
