DuracellEnergizer

dolly zoom

TV's Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

 

blowfish said:
This isn't the intro thread any more. now it's the burn in Hell thread! Good Riddance you Star Wars puritans!!

You forgot to capitalize "Now" and "Burn in Hell Thread", decapitalize and place a comma after "riddance", and italicize Star Wars, you Philistine.

 

You forgot to grade his paper.

I wonder if any of the other early drafts will get comic adaptations. I for one would love to see someone try to wring a coherent storyline out of the Journal of the Whills outline.

I used to own a copy of Star Wars Insider #44. I ended up making a collage out of it.

blowfish said:

This isn't the intro thread any more. now it's the burn in Hell thread! Good Riddance you Star Wars puritans!!

Bingowings said:

Nirvana is over-rated.

"Fantic" must be a mispelling of "fan tick" (as in a tick which is a fan).

^Oh, well, at least I liked Part III, which reminds me ...

Back to the Future, Part III (1990)

I loved this movie - its just as good as the original. Also, it almost retroactively makes Part II a better movie (but only almost).

I always use alternate universes to explain discrepancies like these. I'm just so damn pedantic that way.

C3PX? Is he a relative or replicant of yours?

Why does Mickey have two plumes of steam erupting from his neck?

This is actually something I've wanted to see the EU do for sometime now. I only hope they follow the original script as closely as possible and give the heroes RED lightsabers.

Christmas Vacation (1989)

I enjoyed it, though it's nowhere near as good as the original. It was weird seeing Juliette Lewis with blonde hair.

The X-Files (1998)

This was basically an extended Mytharc episode, which makes it twice as tedious, boring, and pointless as it would have been otherwise.

Back to the Future, Part II (1989)

To call this a haphazard mess would be an understatement. The time travel rules make even less sense this time around, almost every character who shows his/her face is obnoxious, and the whole idea of going back to the events in the first film was a stupid, stagnant idea. If it wasn't for Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd, I'd hate this movie.

Memoirs of an Invisible Man (1992)

An alright movie, but it just wasn't very interesting. As a time-killer, it did its job.

The Fog (1980)

It was decent, but a longer runtime and more character development would have probably improved it. Its still definately better than the remake at any rate.

LEVITICUS 19:28

My basic assumption: if true, objective morality exists, humanity hasn't the slightest clue as to what it is.

civil war soldier escapes hanging dream short film

This thread is starting to feel rather Lynchian.

Modern technology gives me an ice cream headache.

I would like to see what would happen if you open a can of beer after it's been put through a paint can shaker.

BC or AD?

back to the future parallel universes

"Dead Bart" is awesome, though. I would literally (and I mean literally) give my left hand to have that as the official series finale for The Simpsons.

I have a - probably impossible - dream of becoming a director someday, and since my aesthetic film tastes pretty much range from the 60's-80's, it helps to know what it would take to make my own movies look similar.

I appreciate all the answers, everyone - thanks!