logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#630736
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

Not the greatest movie in the world, but it's still done supremely well. Freddy's at his best here, Heather Langenkamp is wonderful eye - and IMO, ear - candy, and it's interesting to watch Johnny Depp in his first role as an actor.

Willow (1988)

A nice little film. While it does feel a little overlong, the chemistry between the actors and the general atmosphere of the film make up for it (plus, I just get a kick out of recognizing all the "little person" actors I've seen in other roles).

Poltergeist (1982)

The character interactions really make this film, and the general aura of menace the primal spiritual Beast provides is an extra bonus. It does take a little while for the story to get really interesting, though. The worst thing I can really say about this movie is that its sequels are abysmally shitty.

Back to the Future (1985)

An enjoyably fun movie, but the time travel rules give me a headache.

Highlander 2: Renegade Version (1995)

This is a great improvement over the theatrical version of the film. Removing the whole "Immortals are aliens" aspect makes the movie a lot more palatable, and the addition/rearranging of certain scenes does make it actually feel like a real Highlander film at times. Some changes that still needed to be made weren't, though, and - by and large - the movie has only been elevated to the level of "mediocre".

Post
#630648
Topic
A Question on the Look of Film from Era to Era
Time

I think it's apparent that films look different from decade to decade (films made in the 50's look like they were made in the 50's, 60's from the 60's, 70's from the 70's, etc, etc.) Why is this? Is it due to the cameras used, the film stock, the way the film was processed, a combination of factors? Can the aesthetics of a particular era be replicated using digital tools (ie. can a film shot with digital cameras be made to look like it was shot in the 80's)?

Post
#630627
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Tobar said:

While I highly doubt George has ever bothered to get into the Star Wars novels. It's a pretty safe bet he gets a kick out of the comics. What with his incorporating Aayla Secura into AOTC and the throw away line about Quinlan Vos in ROTS.


If only he'd remembered to give her the magenta lightsaber she was shown to have carried in those comics ...

Post
#629698
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Tobar said:



DuracellEnergizer said:

The Punisher (2004)

I really liked this film, and I wish more comic books films were made this way. The character development was well done, and I loved how Castle manipulated the Saints and their people into doing his job for him. It's a shame Thomas Jane never got to reprise his role in a sequel; I'd definately would have loved to see where they would have gone with his story.


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWpK0wsnitc">Dirty Laundry</a>


That's a short film, though.

Bingowings said:


DuracellEnergizer

Did I read this right?

Did you actually say the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre is rather weak and less than the second sequel?

Please, please tell me I got that wrong.


Weaker than I expected, at any rate. If it's any consolation, I give both movies the same rating (albeit for different reasons).

SilverWook said:



DuracellEnergizer said:

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)

*sigh* ... yet another movie that doesn't live up to the appreciations of youth. Roger is definately more annoying to me now as an adult, and I finally understand why Eddie couldn't stand the spastic twerp. Another aspect of the film that doesn't jive with me anymore is the live action-animation combo - it's all so unsettingly surreal. On the upside, though, I still find the performances of Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd strong (Judge Doom isn't as menacing to me as he used to be, though, unfortunately).



Spaceballs (1987)

I really don't see why so many people like this parody. I find stuff like "Barf", "Yogurt", and "the Schwartz" far from funny - it's either juvenilely stupid or just plain unfunny. Pizza the Hutt was amusing, though, I'll give it that.




It's a world where cartoon characters are as real as anyone else in Hollywood, (more or less) it's supposed to be surreal! As Roger may be a murderer, his being a bit annoying serves to cast doubt on his innocence. Eddie already doesn't like toons anyway. ;)


I'm not really criticizing the movie for the surreal aspect - it's probably unavoidable when combining animation with live-action on such a large scale. Consider my comment more of an observation of a personal reaction more than anything else.

And when it comes to Roger, yeah, I know Roger was meant to be annoying, that it serves a purpose. Still, 104 minutes of his antics makes the urge to kill inevitable.

Post
#629201
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986)

It never fails to amaze me at how great my tastes have evolved since I was a kid; I found this film awesome and entertaining when I saw it way back in 2001/2002, but now I find it largely distasteful and more than a little annoying.

Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III (1990)

Unlike with its predecessor, I don't feel any great disappreciation for this film. Sure, it doesn't feel as dynamic as it used to, and the female protagonist seems a bit weaker than the way I remembered, but overall I think it's a decent sequel (truth be told, I think its better than the original, which I found rather weak).

Candyman (1992)

Yet another film that doesn't feel as strong as it used to. Beyond that, though, it's a solid movie, with a well-crafted story, a competent cast, and an awesome score.

Return of the Living Dead (1985)

Truth be told, I never really liked this movie, and it its only gotten worse with time (my disenchantment with zombie films in general most definately has something to do with this). The best thing I can say about this film is that the zombie makeup/props is/are well-crafted. Also, as an aside, the whole plot of the movie just serves to remind me of why I can never suspend my disbelief when it comes to scientific explanations/origins for zombies; yes, I know this film is all tongue-in-cheek and isn't meant to be taken at all seriously, but still ...

Wishmaster 2: Evil Never Dies (1999)

Andrew Divoff was awesome in this, and I loved pretty much each scene he showed up in. Unfortunately, the rest of the film wasn't so hot, and the end was just downright awful. This sequel certainly wasn't as good as the original.

Hellraiser (1987)

I found this movie decent, and that's all I can really say about it - it left me neither hot nor cold. I suppose I could bring up Ashley Laurence's hair - which I felt looked rather awful throughout most of the film - but that's an unimportant detail that has no real bearing in the greater scheme of things. All in all, I am left with an interest to read the novella this was based on.

Eight Legged Freaks (2002)

What a great big meh this movie was - I find it hard to believe I felt any great enthusiasm for it back when I was a kid. The giant CG spiders quickly grow dull, and none of the characters are all that interesting. For one reason or another, I felt that the end shot - a close-up of a grinning conspiracy theorist's gold-capped teeth - sums this movie up perfectly. This would have been so much better had Scarlett Johansson been the one tasered in the crotch and then eaten by the monster arachnids.

Arachniphobia (1990)

Now this is how evil spider movies should be done - with real spiders and props, no CG whatsoever. This was definately a fun movie, and one I'd love to watch again. The only downside I saw to this film was the ending; I just can't see eye-to-eye with anyone who would choose to live in the cold, dead city over lush, rustic areas.

Return of the Living Dead Part II (1988)

I don't know if this movie was slighty better than its predecessor or only stupid in other ways; regardless, it still wasn't a good movie. It was amusing to see the guy who played Bobby from Twin Peaks in this, though, and the redhead in the denim skirt was appeasingly hot (sigh ... and I don't even like rating movies based on sex appeal).

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)

*sigh* ... yet another movie that doesn't live up to the appreciations of youth. Roger is definately more annoying to me now as an adult, and I finally understand why Eddie couldn't stand the spastic twerp. Another aspect of the film that doesn't jive with me anymore is the live action-animation combo - it's all so unsettingly surreal. On the upside, though, I still find the performances of Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd strong (Judge Doom isn't as menacing to me as he used to be, though, unfortunately).

The 13th Warrior (1999)

I liked this film. Plot was decent, and the location shots were beautiful. I can't really buy Banderas as an Arab, though.

Spaceballs (1987)

I really don't see why so many people like this parody. I find stuff like "Barf", "Yogurt", and "the Schwartz" far from funny - it's either juvenilely stupid or just plain unfunny. Pizza the Hutt was amusing, though, I'll give it that.

The Legend of Sleepy Hollow (1949)

It gets good once the Headless Horseman shows up. The stuff preceeding it is pretty meh, however.

The Punisher (2004)

I really liked this film, and I wish more comic books films were made this way. The character development was well done, and I loved how Castle manipulated the Saints and their people into doing his job for him. It's a shame Thomas Jane never got to reprise his role in a sequel; I'd definately would have loved to see where they would have gone with his story.

Deadtime Stories (1986)

A mediocre anthology horror film that deserves its obscurity. The first story was decent, but the second was lame and the third outright stupid. The song in the opening credits was awesome, though.

Crossworlds (1996)

The concept of parallel universes is so incredibly ripe for storytelling, so why do pretty much all films that centre around the concept seem so incredibly poor? There's nothing about this movie that's enduring - not even Rutger Hauer brings anything worthy to the plate. The worst thing about this movie is that I can see, with a few minor adjustments, how this could have been so much better.

Post
#629183
Topic
Religion
Time

CP3S said:


A very close friend of mine is what would be called an "evangelical atheist". While I have typically been content with the live and let live philosophy in my own atheism, he has been trying to convince me of the merits of evangelical atheism, and I think he has some very good points.


Evangelical atheists are hypocrites.

Post
#628913
Topic
Religion
Time

I was waiting at the bus stop this morning, minding my own business, when a Jehovah's Witness pulled up in her car, got out, and started blah blah blahing about some meeting and gave me a flyer before getting back in her car and driving off.

The moral of this story? Jehovah's Witnesses never fail to discover new and interesting ways of alienating everyone outside of their annoying little cult.

Post
#628775
Topic
my memory isn't that bad, is it? (in SW '77 - Luke misses with the grappling hook?)
Time

BasiliskFang said:


I've also been asking what are the names of the characters in the wizard of oz who chant OOOOOO WEEE OOOOOO OOOO OH! The best answer I got was, "Aren't those the playing cards?" I said, "That's Alice!" His response was,"I'm pretty sure you're wrong."


Jeez, what a maroon. The answer is obviously Mr. Burns' men.