logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#633430
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

I've had crushes on nine girls, and I can remember the names of each of them and the order in which I crushed on them (this includes the one I actually fell in love with).

Name: Brandy (last name forgotten); Crush Date: 1997-1998

All I really remember of her is that she had long, blonde hair and an older sister who could have been her twin if it weren't for the fact that she was taller and brunette. My latent heterosexuality hadn't yet kicked in at that point in my life, so it was a purely heteroromantic asexual attraction.

Name: Sarah Gibson; Crush Date: 1998/1999

In retrospect, I don't know what I ever saw in her; she had a lousy personality, a dog's face, and an anorexic's body. This was yet another heteroromantic asexual attraction.

Name: Candace Roland/Rowland; Crush Date: 1999/2000-2001

She was blonde, had a nice figure, but an unappealing complexion. This was my first completely heterosexual crush.

Name: Dania Wilson-Holland; Crush Date: 2001-2008(?)

I've commented on her before elsewhere on this forum, so all I'll say is that this is the only crush I've ever had that developed into something that wasn't fleeting.

Name: Lauren Lee Smith; Crush Date: 2002-2005

This is my first crush on a celebrity (or should I say pseudo-celebrity) and not on a person I actually knew. She's a minor Canadian actress who, while being rather pretty, is a bit too much on the skinny side for my current tastes.

Name: Jennifer Peterson-Hind; Crush Date: 2007-2009

Another pseudo-celebrity - a singer, this time around. I got the hots for her after seeing her on the kids' TV show Hi-5.

Name: Brianna (last name unknown); Crush Date: 2008

I met her while working as a dishwasher at a local restaurant. She was a tall, trim, brunette server. I never really got the chance to know her, conflicting work schedules eventually prevented us from ever getting the chance to do so, and once I got laid off all bets were off. I'm still mad about this one, as this was the only time I had the chance to make a good first impression on a girl I liked.

Name: Alanis Morissette; Crush Date: 2008-2010

This was more of a crush on the 1991-1992 Alanis than the 1995-present day Alanis; it's not pleasant being attracted to a woman who doesn't really exist anymore.

Name: Heather Langenkamp; Crush Date: present

This is yet another example of me having a crush on a woman who doesn't really exist anymore; I'm attracted to the Heather Langenkamp of 1984-1997, not the middle-aged Heather Langenkamp of today (God, why-oh-why was I born in the wrong decade?)

Post
#633334
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Bingowings said:


It is unlikely that, especially with such a character change in his parents they would have sex on the same nights and the same sperms would hit the same eggs and have the same success.

They would almost certainly have different sex and different children.


That is one of the things about BTTF that irks me. IMO, the actors who played David and Linda should have been given some makeovers to give their characters different looks in the second timeline.

Also does this mean that 'their' spoiled rich kid Marty is having a divergent universe set of adventures where he accidentally turns his successful parents into a drunk and a coward???


That would have been nice.

Post
#633323
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

xhonzi said:



DuracellEnergizer said:



xhonzi said:

DuracellEnergizer said:
I like time travel, provided it makes some lick of sense (and incorporates parallel universes into it's method of operation).



Er... Back to the Future Pt 2?



BTTF2 doesn't utilize parallel timelines, Doc's "1985A" explanation notwithstanding, as all the other stuff involving paradoxes, changing timelines, etc. makes that impossible.




Isn't that a bit like saying "BTTF2 doesn't involve time travel, all of the time travel notwithstanding"


Oy ... I'll try to make my case in a far more clearer and straightforward manner.

In the first film, Marty alters the way his parents met. This initially started to cause Marty and his siblings to fade from existence - as evidenced in the Marty's changing photo of himself and his siblings (along with himself starting to fade away near the end of the film)- before he corrected the course and preserved his and his siblings' future existence. By all indications, this shows that the BTTF Universe consists of only a single, malleable timeline that can be altered by time travelling effects.

In the second film, while preparing to journey back to 1955 from 1985A to undo the tampering 2015 Biff made to the timestream, Doc Brown says that it's okay to leave Jennifer and Einstein in that ugly present, as the world around them will simple reconfigure itself into a more familiar world once they've fixed the past. More evidence that the BTTF Universe consists of a single, malleable timeline.

In the third film, we get more examples of a malleable timeline, as evidenced in the photo of Doc Brown's gravestone that keeps changing everytime he and Marty influence the world of 1885. Again, a single, malleable timeline.

Now, if time travel really did create parallel universes everytime someone travelled back in time to alter history, then there would be no changing photographs, no fading Marty, Jennifer and Einstein would be forever stuck in 1985A, etc. and all the various timelines featured throughout the trilogy would co-exist parallel to one another, completely unaffected by the time travelling events occuring within the films.

Post
#633301
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

xhonzi said:



DuracellEnergizer said:



xhonzi said:
Bingo "I hate show tunes" wings:
I've never met anyone too old for time travel.



Unless you're Dur, apparently.



I like time travel, provided it makes some lick of sense (and incorporates parallel universes into it's method of operation).


Er... Back to the Future Pt 2?


BTTF2 doesn't utilize parallel timelines, Doc's "1985A" explanation notwithstanding, as all the other stuff involving paradoxes, changing timelines, etc. makes that impossible.

Post
#632818
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

AntcuFaalb said:


Hearing the word "sith" reminds me of everything that has been done to ruin Star Wars over the years.

I'm truly sick of this Jedi vs. X crap. It's terrible storytelling designed to appeal to babies.

Jedi, Sith/Dark Jedi, lightsabers, and "The Force" were all things used to move the plot along in the OT. That's right: they were <span style="text-decoration: underline;">used</span> to move the plot along and they weren't the focus of the plot.

I guess I'm trying to say that seeing Jabba the fucking Hutt in ROTJ was a hell of a lot more interesting than seeing Yoda flipping around with a lightsaber and tossing junk with "The Force" in AOTC.


Agree 100%. The PT should have focused on the rise and fall of Anakin, not on the pissing contest between the Jedi & Sith.

Post
#632585
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Joy Ride (2001)

One of the few horror movies of the 21st Century that isn't bad ;-) I only wish Ted Levine had played the actual killer instead of just doing the killer's voice.

The Mummy (1999)

The story and cast are both solid, but the CGI cripples it. Seriously, what is up with all the elongated CG jaws? Does the director have a fetish for dislocated jaws, or is he trying to emulate the Scream films in some way?

Sleeping Bag (1985)

Okay, so this is a music video for the ZZ Top song and not an actual film. It's listed on IMDb, though, so I felt like giving in to some urges. Suffice it to say, there's something about having Heather Langenkamp, Tracey Walter, a monster truck, and a space shuttle launching from within the Great Pyramid all together in one package that I find extremely gratifying.

Nickel Mountain (1984)

A pretty well made and touching film, it still has a rather weak ending. Overall, though, I still liked it, and at least what I expected to happen at the end didn't (that would have killed the entire movie for me).

Psycho IV: The Beginning (1990)

Some nagging little continuity issues with the original film aside, this is a pretty decent prequel to Psycho. Olivia Hussey was convincing as Norman's crazy mother, and Henry Thomas did a great job playing the young Norman Bates. On the downside, this entry in the series is definately the weakest of the four from a visual standpoint.

Post
#632371
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

xhonzi said:

Bingo "I hate show tunes" wings:
I've never met anyone too old for time travel.


Unless you're Dur, apparently.


I like time travel, provided it makes some lick of sense (and incorporates parallel universes into it's method of operation).

---

The People Under the Stairs (1991)

Had I never seen Twin Peaks, I probably wouldn't have enjoyed this film as much as I did.

Holes (2003)

I've never read the book, so I don't know how this movie compares to it. What I saw, though, I enjoyed immensely, so I can't see it being too much better. Jon Voight was ridiculous (in a good way) Sigourney Weaver was dangerously sexy (and I don't usually find her sexy) and Shia LaBeouf was surprisingly decent (I think this is the only one of his movies I've seen that I've found to be above mediocre).

Disturbia (2003)

All this film served to do is remind me of why I hate Generations Y & Z so much. The only saving grace is David Morse; he brings more respectibility to this movie than it deserves to have.

Deja Vu (2006)

This movie took time to get going, but it picked up and ended up delivering.

War of the Worlds (2005)

If there's any movie beyond The Adventures of Tintin that can display just how mediocre Speilberg has become as a director, it's this one. How can someone take a great book like War of the Worlds and make it feel so lifeless and dull? How can someone take good actors like Dakota Fanning and Tim Robbins and give them absolutely nothing to work with? The only good scene is the entire film is the one with the peanut butter sandwiches, and that's just sad.

Mystery Men (1999)

I like this movie, though I can see why others wouldn't and why it received so many mixed reviews. I still would have liked to have seen a sequel, though.

Super Mario Bros. (1993)

The only good thing I can say about this movie is that Bob Hoskins could have been a great Mario. Otherwise, it completely sucks; the plot is stupid (the despot of one city on a barren, resourceless parallel Earth really thinks he can conquer the entire world - with all its military powers and the resources at their disposal - with only a handful of stupid lizard men, really?), the acting is bad (Leguizamo is miscast, and Hopper is just painful to behold), and the science worse (if you don't have a basic understanding of how evolution works, then don't write about it).

Unbreakable (2000)

Decent, but not all that engaging; the revelation Samuel L. Jackson's character gives at the end is the only part of the film that really hooked me, I'm sorry to say.

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

I can't believe the screenplay was written by Akiva Goldsman; this film is positively, hauntingly, beautiful and touching. I haven't seen all that many films with Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly, yet I still must say there is nothing else they've ever done that comes even come close to touching the heights their performances reached with this film.

I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

As far as slashers go, this one was pretty decent. Jennifer Love Hewitt's hair and Anne Heche's body were positively mortifying.

Post
#632343
Topic
Dark Horse to adapt &quot;The Star Wars.&quot;
Time

darth_ender said:


Wow, you guys are absolutely right.  There is so much interesting material in those earlier drafts that would be amazing to see in "how it could have been" comic form.  Seriously, that would be fun to read, and now I can't help but wonder if success in this current endeavor might lead to comics of other film drafts!


I'd like to see an entire series devoted to alternate SW Universes, myself. This could open the door to such a thing.