logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#643967
Topic
Which Star Trek series do you like best and why? Who is your favorite commander?
Time

So far, I like TOS the most; it's the most fun, the chemistry between the characters is excellent, and it tries to think big even if it doesn't entirely succeed.

After watching almost four seasons of TNG, I've come to appreciate it a fair bit more than I did when I first started watching it (Data is awesome!); it does take itself too seriously, though, most of the aliens are lame, and I don't like Roddenberry's "perfect" vision of the Federation, so I can't rate it as highly as TOS.

I've only seen a few episodes of DS9 and that was some years back, so I can't really comment on it, except to say that I remember it was more in the spirit of TOS and that the weapons looked like cheap plastic toys.

I have no interest in VOY, ENT, or Abrams' Trek, so I'm not going to watch them, therefore I can't comment on them (take from that what you will).

As for my favourite commander - that's Spock (he's my favourite character in the franchise, though, so that can't come as any surprise).

Post
#643965
Topic
What is your personal Star Trek canon?
Time

My personal canon consists of a Star Trek universe that exists solely within my head - Spock is the result of genetic engineering, full blooded Vulcans & Romulans have green skin, the Eugenics Wars occurred after the formation of the Federation, most human aliens are human offshoot species, two transporters are needed in order for transportation to work, the Mirror Universe was created by time travel, universal translators are more realistic and less universal, Pike has a cooler looking wheelchair, etc. - its loosely inspired by TOS, some of TNG, and a few comics, but that's all - nothing that occurs in any of the series, movies, comics, etc. happens concretely as shown.

Post
#643796
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

I wonder how things would have turned out had everyone - after reading the novel Dracula when it was first published - come away with the idea that "Dracula" was actually not a name but a title all vampires used. Probably the idea would have only gained more-and-more prominence until it became holy writ, leading almost all vampire characters in later works of fiction to bear the "Dracula" name along with their own. There would have been a Dracula Orlok, Dracula Blackula, Dracula Count, Dracula Edward, etc.

It would have been so unbelievably fucking stupid.