Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

User Group
Trusted Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
21-Apr-2019
Posts
22,725
Web Site
https://dreamsofarandygitfiend.blogspot.com/

Post History

Post
#1274613
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Shopping Maul said:

I’m probably gonna get slapped here, but I despise this film. Talk about Special editions - this film is ‘Han Shot First’ on steroids. Placing the Tantive at the battle itself and having Vader - who had just seen the rebels passing the plans through a doorway - suddenly get his facts wrong (“several transmissions were beamed to this ship…”), followed by an interrogation with Leia that doesn’t remotely reflect what Vader has supposedly just witnessed (perhaps Disney could do a Lucas and replace Vader’s lines with “Princess, I just saw you at the battle receiving the plans firsthand for Sith’s sake!”)…and all so we can see Vader exhibit a particular badassery that he fails to wield ten minutes later in 1977?!?

But the worst crime (no, it isn’t the appearance and repeated dialogue of the cantina aliens from ANH) is the Death Star exhaust port fiasco. The whole point of the exercise was that the shot was basically impossible. It was a desperate plan. That’s why every rebel in the briefing room was shifting nervously in their seats. That’s why Wedge Mk 1 said “that’s impossible, even for a computer”. That’s why the first attempt failed despite said computer. That’s why General Dodonna didn’t say “good news guys, a weakness was planted in the station for our benefit!”. That’s why it took Luke trusting in the Force to make this seemingly impossible shot work. If a dude was really going to plant a weakness in the DS, would he make it so effing difficult that only a budding space wizard could pull it off?

The Death Star wasn’t blown up because of insider sabotage. It was destroyed because Imperial hubris failed to account for rebel ingenuity and tenacity (hence the argument between Taggi and Motti in ANH), not to mention the wild card that was Luke Skywalker. Why mess with this?

Not to state the obvious on a site dedicated to this one truth but, as we’ve been stridently pointing out to Lucas for decades now, Star Wars '77 was fine as it was.

I don’t disagree with your points one iota, but I still don’t hate or dislike the film. I view it as I view pretty much any other fanfilm with effort put into it; I appreciate its aesthetics/technical achievements though the characterization/writing falls short.

Post
#1274408
Topic
Disney to buy 20th (21st) Century Fox? (Disney has now bought them - 14 Dec '17)
Time

dahmage said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

snooker said:

I don’t like that Disney has a monopoly on the rights to my entire childhood, personally. Freaks me out.

That’s why any Disney film I purchase in the future will be purchased secondhand.

I’d use my firsthand, but I’m elitist that way, so …

Pfft. If you ain’t telekinetic, you ain’t nothin’.

Post
#1274299
Topic
The Star Wars Saga – Streamlined
Time

Anakin Starkiller said:

It seems odd to me to leave the ST out of this, cuz it’s another section of the saga that clearly wasn’t planned in 1977 and feels like a natural fit for such project.

I had some ideas for an ST rewrite, but I was gonna stick with the PT-OT because those were Lucas’ babies.

Really, though, your rewrites seem to do far than make things consistent and viewable in chronological order.

My previous PT rewrite was a deliberate inversion of the OT. I could craft a rewrite more in keeping with the films’ spirit if that was my goal.

Points are all moot now, though, since I’ve lost interest in a streamlined saga.

Post
#1273231
Topic
General Star Wars Random Thoughts Thread
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Choosing to depict the lightsaber as anything more than a rarely used ceremonial weapon was an unwise decision.

What would you consider the limits of rare usage?

One-on-one combat with a lone gunman or another lightsaber wielder. Never in the battlefield against multiple gun-wielding combatants.