logo Sign In

DominicCobb

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Aug-2011
Last activity
20-Jun-2025
Posts
10,455

Post History

Post
#640333
Topic
Star Trek Into Darkness Full Spoiler Discussion
Time

Do you remember in Space Seed when they're on the Botany Bay and the air pressure or whatever is about to kill sleeping Khan but then Kirk breaks open the glass and saves him? I wish that when Marcus was on the Botany Bay Khan just died and have Harrison say something like "we lost our leader when they tried to wake him up, thankfully I didn't suffer the same fate." People would be pissed that they killed Khan off screen but hopefully they would understand why, Khan's already had his day. Really I feel like the only reason they called him Khan was so Spock could yell "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!" though of course even that scene felt out of place.

Hell, they could of at least explained his British face by saying Marcus gave him plastic surgery or something, I was actually half expecting this.

Whatever, it's really not that big of a deal in the end. It would only really be annoying if Khan did all the same stuff as before, but like I said earlier, he's got a new plot so he doesn't feel been there done that.

Post
#639968
Topic
Star Trek Into Darkness Full Spoiler Discussion
Time

CP3S said:

DominicCobb said:

if they keep up the quality, this will easily be one of the greatest film trilogies ever.

Wow! No offense, but some of you guys never fail to surprise me with how willing you are to consume and enjoy pure shit. If you enjoyed it, great. But seriously, one of the greatest film trilogies ever?

This is why Orci, Kurtzman, Abrams, and Bay are some of the hottest names as well as the go to guys in Hollywood right now. Mix some dog awful but sometimes quipy dialogue over a tried and true (and tired) plot, add pretty lights and explosions, a few pairs of tits and some hot young faces, and BAM! Hollywood magic! Enthralled audiences! Raking in money by the millions!

Ugh!

None taken. While I realize some people don't like these movies, I have to say I'll never understand how people could compare them to Michael Bay. I don't know, agree to disagree.

Anyway, saying this could be one of the greatest film trilogies of all time does not mean that I think these are some of the greatest films of all time, because they aren't. I simply mean that when you when you really think about it, there are only a handful of really great film trilogies (I could go through them but I do not think here is really the place, but really, think about how many great trilogies there are). A good film trilogy to me is one that keeps a consistent high quality. The prospect of these new Star Trek films having a third film of high quality to round out their trilogy excites me. But of course, if you think these movies are pure shit, then you wouldn't understand that.

SilverWook said:

I had those emotions too. In 1982! ;)

Ha, ha, well I guess I understand that. To me the WOK connection only made the emotions stronger.

Post
#639909
Topic
Star Trek Into Darkness Full Spoiler Discussion
Time

I disagree about the dramatic tension being lost on Kirk's death. Even though I forgot about the tribble by the time Kirk was dying, I knew he wouldn't stay dead for long. But that didn't matter. To Kirk, and to Spock, he was dying. And he died. They were feeling some pretty strong emotions, and, because I love these characters so much, and, because the scene was so well executed, I felt those emotions with them.

I will concede that this definitely isn't as uplifting as the previous one. It's actually that very fact that's making me consider my preference towards Into Darkness. Honestly, this reminds me of my feelings toward Star Wars. I used to think ESB was the greatest, by SW just got this great feeling of hope to it. Star Trek 09's got that too. I don't know. I'll have to wait some time to see how my opinions form.

Post
#639850
Topic
Star Trek Into Darkness Full Spoiler Discussion
Time

Just saw it yesterday. No offense, but you guys never fail to surprise me with your cynicism and apparent inability to enjoy things for what they are. I absolutely LOVED this film. Possibly my favorite Trek movie of all time.

The rumors have been speculating a Khanbermatch for some time now, and going into the movie I really put it at the back of my mind because I didn't want it to happen. Not because I didn't like Khan, on the contrary I love Wrath of Khan as much as the next guy. But, I felt Khan was well and covered between Space Seed and WOK. 

However, when he showed up here, it was clear from the reveal that this was new ground. And it all was. My main worry when the Khan rumors were circulating was that they were going to just retread WOK. But this felt wholly original. Really everything he did here was new. That made me happy, and it made me okay that they didn't do more with him because I really didn't feel they needed to, or should, tread ground that had already been very well trodden. Of course I'll admit that making him Khan and not one of the others wasn't entirely necessary, and getting over the fact that Cumbermatch looked nothing like Montalban took a bit. (Speaking of unnecessary: the Nimoy cameo.)

As for the other shout outs to WOK, I thought they were well placed and properly executed, and just fresh enough to still make me happy. Or sad in the case of Kirk's death. Yeah, I'll admit it. I cried. (Though I have to say Spock yelling "KHAAAAAN" in the middle of my crying spell killed it a bit, but I'll probably be more okay with it on second viewing.)

Anyways I am beyond pumped for Trek 3, or whatever they'll call it, Return of the Trek or some shit. Should be amazing, and, if they keep up the quality, this will easily be one of the greatest film trilogies ever.

 

Post
#639728
Topic
Star Wars: Episode VII to be directed by J.J. Abrams **NON SPOILER THREAD**
Time

Honestly I would be disappointed if the new trilogy centered on the old guys. First of all, the previous six movies all featured a mostly young cast. Secondly, their stories are over. Sure, you could give them other things to do, but I like the idea that the OT was their central story, just as the PT was for Obi-Wan and Anakin, though they were both in the OT films as well.

Post
#630617
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Well, I knew it had been a while since I posted my LMS, but I didn't know how long it was. Anyway, here's actually my entire viewing for the month of March, I'll try to be brief:

The Raid: Redemption (2012) 8/10 - Seriously awesome action movie. Not much more.

The Racket (1928) 8.5/10 - Engrossing silent gangster pic. A little to fast at first.

Let There Be Light (1946) 9/10 - Extremely interesting documentary study of psychonuerotic WWII vets by John Huston. Wish there'd been more.

The Master (2012) 10/10 - Second watch even better than the first. I feel like I really understand this movie now. The above doc gives insight.

Rio Bravo (1959) 9.5/10 - Great western. Honestly great all around. 

Good Morning, Vietnam (1987) 9/10 - Quite funny, somewhat moving film.

The Great McGinty (1940) 9/10 - Sharp, often laugh-out-loud political satire.

Spellbound (1945) 9/10 - Hitch scores again. Excellent all around as usual. When you think about it, though, it's basically your standard Hitchcock murder story, but with a delusional twist.

Breathless (1960) 9/10 - Definitely a great movie. Didn't really click with me, though. Will have to watch again sometime.

The Breakfast Club (1985) 9/10 - Pretty damn good. Love the style. Little too stereotypical. I know some would say this film proves stereotypes wrong, but it doesn't, it just explains them. 

The Karate Kid (1984) 8.5/10 - Don't know what took me so long to see this. Very enjoyable film, even if it's oftentimes very silly. 

Killing Them Softly (2012) 8/10 - Had high hopes for this because of Andrew Dominik's last film. Was disappointed. There is some honestly great stuff in here, including top-notch performances from pretty much everyone. But there's no flow. It's very uneven. You can't get into it.

21 Jump Street (2012) 9/10 - I never had any desire to watch this. But I did, and I'm glad. It was hilarious. I don't know, maybe I'm alone here, but I thought this was great.

Sixteen Candles (1984) 8/10 - Pretty good. Very silly, very over-the-top. But sometimes pretty funny, and pretty honest.

Men In Black 3 (2012) 8/10 - A lot better than I expected. Very funny, very enjoyable. Doesn't really get started until J goes back in time. Lot of potential missed. But great fun anyway.

Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 1 and 2 (2012/2013) 8.5/10 - I'm giving the score as an overall. It would be lower otherwise. This definitely needs to be watched back to back. If it is, it's an amazing Batman story.

The Bad News Bears (1976) 10/10 - I did not expect to love this movie as much as I did. Brilliantly crafted picture. 

The Hunger Games (2012) 8/10 - Not nearly as bad as expected. Actually quite good. Points deducted for saving character development, plot explanation, and a good ending for the sequels (at least I hope that that stuff will show up at some point. I will admit I've not read any of the books, so I do not know for sure).

Vampire's Kiss (1988) 8/10 - Jesus Christ what the hell is this movie. It took me awhile, but I'm pretty sure this is supposed to be a comedy. At least I hope so. Anyway, Nic Cage gives an outstanding performance that makes this one of the funniest movies I've ever seen. Any scene without him falls flat for me. Either way a seriously bat shit crazy movie.

 

 

 

Post
#628862
Topic
Disney Acquires LucasFilm for $4.05 billion, Episode 7 in 2015, 8 and 9 to Follow, New Film Every 2-3 Years
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

 

DominicCobb said:


On the other hand, just simply being a bad jedi would ignore what has come before.


Not really.

 

Probably depends on what you're already ignoring. If this is Episode VII, it would make sense that it takes into account all six films prior. All those six films feature at least one sith villain, or, maybe I should say, at least one villain per movie is one the dark side. Having the villain be simply a bad jedi, one that is not on the dark side, would be somewhat inconsistent me thinks, if you understand my reasoning.

Post
#628685
Topic
Disney Acquires LucasFilm for $4.05 billion, Episode 7 in 2015, 8 and 9 to Follow, New Film Every 2-3 Years
Time

I've been hoping for a jedi that is basically a self made sith, or like a sith wannabe. Basically a bad guy jedi who likens himself a sith. Actually being a sith would kind of ruin what has come before, I think. On the other hand, just simply being a bad jedi would ignore what has come before.

Post
#626586
Topic
A New direction for Lucasfilm Animation
Time

Makes sense to me.

As alluring as new Star Wars movies are, some people won't shell out money for tickets when there's a SW show on TV. Sounds crazy, but it is kind of true.

The Clones Wars cancellation is equal parts disappointing and expected. I'm actually really behind on the show, but all of what I've seen is awesome. The expected part is that when the show was first announced, Lucas said it would actually only last 5 seasons. So I've actually been expecting an announcement of its ending for the past year or so.

Detours... well it looked pretty stupid. I was going to give it a chance because, you know, original SW material, but with these new movies, all I can say is fuck that. I could care less what happens to it now. 

Post
#625225
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

darth_ender said:

I think the whole color argument is pointless for the Revisited series.  This is a special edition, not a preservation.  That means that if Adywan likes some other colors better, he should alter the colors according to his taste.  If he accepts others' opinions, he can do so.  But to adhere strictly to the original colors when he's introducing new special effects including altered lighting and alteration of other colors seems to be a waste of effort.  If folks want original colors, they should look to projects like DJ's/You_Too's and Harmy's.  If they want a special edition, they should get used to the idea that there will be many elements that are not present in the original.

I don't mean to be rude to anyone.  Just making a point.  My apologies if I offend.

 

Thank you for this ender, my thoughts exactly.