logo Sign In

DominicCobb

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Aug-2011
Last activity
20-Jun-2025
Posts
10,455

Post History

Post
#1102451
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

SilverWook said:

The point is if you don’t like a movie, nobody is forcing you to go and watch it.

If they play Rocky Horror and get complaints are they going yank that too?

Worth mentioning GWTW sports a G rating. Can’t get more inoffensive than that. 😛

At the rate things are going, a riot is going to break out at a screening of the My Little Pony Movie.

My point is just that if a lot of people don’t like a movie and aren’t going to watch it, I don’t see why it’s crazy for the theater to play a different movie instead.

Post
#1102386
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

I doubt they’re socks. I’ve got a lot of real Facebook “friends” who do stupid shit like that. Whether it’s a troll campaign is up for debate (usually those come from the alt-right side of thin anyway).

I don’t think it’s that big a deal honestly. Like I said, it depends on the theater. Considering they call it a summer movie series it makes me think they don’t play very many movies, so the ones they do count. I know a great theater that sometimes plays b movie schlock I’ve never heard of before, but no one complains because that’s just what they do every weekend. On the other hand I know a different theater that is typically for plays and music acts. They hold a summer movie series too, and the theme always seems to be “crowd pleasing and inoffensive.” If a movie can’t overcome that threshold, I don’t see why it’s crazy not to play it. Silly, maybe, but not crazy.

Post
#1102383
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Trying to score points with their Facebook contingent, no doubt.

And yeah, I can’t deny Guinness in brown face is unfortunate, but what can you do, much better movie than GWTW.

Ultimately it depends what kind of theater it is. Hard for me to tell, not being familiar with it. But I can see why GWTW might okay for some theaters (that routinely play old movies of all different shapes and sizes), while not necessarily for others (for which playing an old movie is a rarer, community engagement type event). Personally, just thinking about the theaters near me that I know best from back home, I can easily see why it might just be a better choice to go with something different.

Post
#1102380
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

SilverWook said:

Was it really from people who saw the movie? Or social media savvy trolls? Because I doubt theater do comment cards in 2017. Fake accounts on twitter are a thing, I imagine facebook has them too.

Who’s to say? Though it’s not hard to imagine people sitting that one out. Why play Gone With the Wind if more people will show up to Lawrence of Arabia?

Post
#1102376
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Obviously it’s silly, but let me play devil’s advocate. They played the film this month, and there was a poor response from audiences. Audiences didn’t want to see it next year, so they swapped it out - the reason why is almost secondary.

As to that reason why, ever since I first saw it when I was a kid, the film’s glorification of the antebellum South bothered me. It’s of course a classic, and it needs to be seen, but there are other ways to see it. Let me put it this way: if it played at my local theater, I’d skip it and wait till the next screening.

Post
#1102073
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

That’s as ridiculous as comparing taking down a Confederate statue and the Jefferson monument. Give me a break.

why is it ridiculous? Jefferson was a slave owner. People argue the Confederates were traitors. Guess what England thought of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and John Adams in the 1760’s? I guarantee you they thought of them as traitors.

What country do we live in again?

I don’t know about you, but I live in America.

So why would you care what England considers traitors? And why don’t you care what we do?

Post
#1102058
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

That’s as ridiculous as comparing taking down a Confederate statue and the Jefferson monument. Give me a break.

why is it ridiculous? Jefferson was a slave owner. People argue the Confederates were traitors. Guess what England thought of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and John Adams in the 1760’s? I guarantee you they thought of them as traitors.

What country do we live in again?

Post
#1101854
Topic
Kennedy worse than Lucas.
Time

imperialscum said:

DominicCobb said:

I guess some people just have a more refined taste when it comes to their “individual impression” beyond whether they can remember a piece of music they heard two years later.

You guess wrong. If something makes an impression on you, then you will remember it. If not, you will most likely forget it. That is just how human brain work.

Well, believe it or not there is a difference between remembering something and finding it memorable. You can watch a film and think “hey, this music is really good and works really well as a whole and as a part of this film” and remember that impression years later. Whether that means you can remember what the melodies are is something different.

Post
#1101337
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Jeebus said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

I expected TFA to be higher from him, but otherwise, yeah, that seems about right.

That’s the part that tripped me up. I can’t imagine a world where it’s worse than TPM.

Like I said, probably personal reasons relating to his employment with LFL.

I think I’ve seen (through his tweets) that he’s salty about some last-minute changes Abrams made to TFA without consulting the story group (I remember him specifically talking about the opening crawl being changed at the eleventh hour). And I know he’s got a huge problem with Starkiller Base.

The other thing to note is that TFA was handled by Bad Robot, so LFL the production company wasn’t involved as closely as in the other films.