DominicCobb

Only 90s kids remember

darth_ender said:

Heh, I hoped to stir up a little confusion that way.

Up yours.

I’m not tall.

Not short, either.

DuracellEnergizer said:

DominicCobb said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

The Han Solo movie.

I doubt this.

Your skepticism will fail you.

We’ll see.

DuracellEnergizer said:

The Han Solo movie.

I doubt this.

darth_ender said:

What were you expecting, out of curiosity?

Whoops, never mind, wrong thread. This is what happens when you bump every movie thread at once.

(I thought we were here: http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Last-movie-seen/id/11175)

Most of the complaints against millennials are actually complaints against the generation after them. See: this conversation.

darth_ender said:

Little Shop of Horrors (1986). Not a guarantee, but I love this movie, and I think it’s befitting of the season.

Not the movie I was expecting you to post here.

I also like it too as well.

Mocata said:

The teaser for Rogue One was released in April 2016 little over a week after the TFA Blu-ray hit shelves. Why would they change? It makes great financial sense and keeps the fan base reeled in.

Han Solo’s release date is in May.

Saul is digital. True Detective season 1 was 35mm. Can’t think of anything on right now that is film.

Not that that is important to the article anyway, because you can shoot digital at 23.976fps and in fact most cinematic TV shows are shot that way.

For some reason I like to hold off on IMAX for a later date - I honestly didn’t even check my IMAX options (and where I live, there are quite a few). I probably could have got something good too. When I bought my tickets, the site didn’t crash or anything, and maybe only one or two people had gotten there before me, which meant I snagged the best seats in the house. Wonder if the putting the tickets up before they were supposed to had anything to do with that.

Love the poster.

Let’s hope everyone sees it that way.

Meanwhile, I picked up my tickets. Just going to be standard 2D 7:00 for me. Double features were about $40. Same for the fan event. Not worth it.

I meant more other threads. I don’t have a problem avoiding the spoiler thread and even this one. I just don’t want to visit say the random pictures thread and see an image from the movie. That shit annoys me.

I know some people don’t care, but I like going into a movie having seen/known as little as possible. I don’t need to be sold on something I’m already sold on.

Mark’s Down On Your Syntax said:

I predict this thread will produce an accurate prediction by page 7.

I predict the opposite.

It would be nice if any images/details from the new trailer could be confined to the spoiler thread and the spoiler thread only. I’d rather not have to abstain from this site completely until December (although maybe that’d be a good thing for my sanity).

TCW was broadcast 16:9.

I know a fair amount of people that love Blade Runner just like me but I still realize it is a niche film. The original was a cult classic. Both are slow, esoteric, and existential. Not the the standard sci-fi action fare. Ultimately the low numbers aren’t that much of a surprise. We should just be grateful they made the film in the first place (and hope that one day down the line they might be crazy enough to make another).

TV’s Frink said:

SilverWook said:

Really surprised this is being portrayed as a bomb just because it didn’t smash any opening weekend records. By today’s standards Titanic would be considered a failure.

Blade Runner is too much of a cult/niche film to pull the kind of money some people apparently want it to pull.

I’m assuming.

This is true.

I’m so down for that TFA/TLJ double feature (in fact I was hoping they’d do that). Problem is convincing my friends to go with that. Otherwise, I’m curious what the “fan event” is.

Possessed said:

That’s exactly what I said at the time!

I think you’re looking for this thread:
http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/The-Dream-of-the-Giant-Fractal-Woodlouse/id/16077/page/1

I am someone who has a lot of patience for slow movies, but Solaris is one of the few that has tested that patience for me - definitely felt there were a couple spots that when on just a tad too long. Otherwise, a fantastic film.

Possessed said:

TV’s Frink said:

Also, you may have missed it from that “Whatever” guy (not Warb) but my name is now “retarded TV’s FUCK.”

I thought I heard Dom calling you Daddy once?

Excuse me?

moviefreakedmind said:

I’m curious what the appeal is for the 1989 Batman. I find it pretty uneventful for the most part. There’s little action and not a particularly fascinating story. I think Batman Returns is a million times better. That movie is nuts and entertaining as hell; it’s even quite intense and scary at times.

Yes.

I surprisingly enjoyed King Arthur actually. Expectations were low though, and yeah the Guy Ritchie of it all didn’t really work.

Probably not even in the bottom ten of movies I’ve seen this year (Movie Pass is a hell of a drug).