DominicCobb

You’re right, my bad, A Wrinkle in Time was better.

What is plex? Never heard of it before.

I sort of assumed that the ship impacted before it entered hyperspace anyway.

Tyrphanax said:

Every pizza is beautiful.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

But that’s just the thing. I wasn’t trying to give some long unknown insight into the creative process of this film that needed to have holes poked in it. I was giving a witty remark in response to the comment implying that it was done purposely to please faneditors. You took seriously a comment that was an anecdotal response to a joke and came off as a bit arrogant in the process.

As stated, all I said was the word “no.”

Which speaks volumes about your mentality. Carry on.

Alright man, you’re assuming a lot from a single word, but you do you I guess.

Assumed nothing from no. Learned a lot about you from what followed. Move along.

And yet you said that my “no” response was arrogant and not in line with your apparently “witty remark”? Not sure if you’re learning right.

The “no” was fine, albeit slightly rude. The remarks that came off as mildly arrogant came after.

Just strange that you think your post was a witty remark, but mine was “rude.” I mean, I guess it wasn’t that funny even though it was supposed to be (then again yours wasn’t either, maybe we just have different senses of humor).

As for arrogant, do you mean this one, which wasn’t even directed at you?

DominicCobb said:

Didn’t realize you were involved in the production and in the know about what Disney requested, cool, my bad.

Again, just joking around man. Don’t have to take things so personal (especially, like I said, when it’s not directed at you).

Darth Lucas said:

But honestly I’m done arguing about this pointless bs. I have better things to do with my time. Like working in the film industry and actually knowing how things work.

The implication here about what I do is very funny (I suppose you think I just spend all my time dicking around on the internet).

If you’re actually like an executive or someone important, I apologize and take it all back. Ruined that networking opportunity I suppose.

Sir Ridley said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

But that’s just the thing. I wasn’t trying to give some long unknown insight into the creative process of this film that needed to have holes poked in it. I was giving a witty remark in response to the comment implying that it was done purposely to please faneditors. You took seriously a comment that was an anecdotal response to a joke and came off as a bit arrogant in the process.

As stated, all I said was the word “no.”

Which speaks volumes about your mentality. Carry on.

Alright man, you’re assuming a lot from a single word, but you do you I guess.

Assumed nothing from no. Learned a lot about you from what followed. Move along.

And yet you said that my “no” response was arrogant and not in line with your apparently “witty remark”? Not sure if you’re learning right.

Maybe it’s just me, but I read everything you say in the voice and tone of your avatar. That possibly makes you seem older and grumpier than you are, but I like it.

Ha, I feel like I’m actually okay with this.

rodneyfaile said:

I’m going to get involved with The Last Jedi steelbook next week!

Perhaps redundant to post here, as it’s out of context there too…

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

Never heard of Papa Murphy’s, but there’s a chain called Papa Gino’s around where I grew up that’s pretty solid.

I have fond memories of Papa Gino’s.

When I was in high school, this was my go to place with my buddies. I’d always order the large cheese breadsticks because they cost less than a small pizza. Was always a challenge to see if I could finish the whole thing.

Damn, now I’m hungry and sad there’s no Gino’s near me.

Coming to terms with yourself can be hard whether you’re straight, gay, or whatever. But it’s very important. Certainly good news.

Dek Rollins said:

You’ve successfully removed everything that makes The Land Before Time The Land Before Time when making it “better.”

I’m glad you understand.

Dek Rollins said:

As far as my judgment goes C+ isn’t particularly good either. It’s just kind of okay, or at least adequate. Land Before Time is at least worth a solid A-.

Well, I find that a little hard to understand. Like I said though, if the dinosaurs didn’t talk, I’d agree, it’d be great. But they do talk and what they say ranges from silly to dumb to annoying.

Never heard of Papa Murphy’s, but there’s a chain called Papa Gino’s around where I grew up that’s pretty solid.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

But that’s just the thing. I wasn’t trying to give some long unknown insight into the creative process of this film that needed to have holes poked in it. I was giving a witty remark in response to the comment implying that it was done purposely to please faneditors. You took seriously a comment that was an anecdotal response to a joke and came off as a bit arrogant in the process.

As stated, all I said was the word “no.”

Which speaks volumes about your mentality. Carry on.

Alright man, you’re assuming a lot from a single word, but you do you I guess.

Assumed nothing from no. Learned a lot about you from what followed. Move along.

And yet you said that my “no” response was arrogant and not in line with your apparently “witty remark”? Not sure if you’re learning right.

yhwx said:

DominicCobb said:

yhwx said:

I feel sorry for this forum. Y’all really don’t know what good pizza tastes like.

Excuse me, I once went on a pizza tour in NYC.

Okay, I meant to type “except for Dom” in that post.

Thank you for your understanding.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

But that’s just the thing. I wasn’t trying to give some long unknown insight into the creative process of this film that needed to have holes poked in it. I was giving a witty remark in response to the comment implying that it was done purposely to please faneditors. You took seriously a comment that was an anecdotal response to a joke and came off as a bit arrogant in the process.

As stated, all I said was the word “no.”

Which speaks volumes about your mentality. Carry on.

Alright man, you’re assuming a lot from a single word, but you do you I guess.

yhwx said:

I feel sorry for this forum. Y’all really don’t know what good pizza tastes like.

Excuse me, I once went on a pizza tour in NYC.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

But that’s just the thing. I wasn’t trying to give some long unknown insight into the creative process of this film that needed to have holes poked in it. I was giving a witty remark in response to the comment implying that it was done purposely to please faneditors. You took seriously a comment that was an anecdotal response to a joke and came off as a bit arrogant in the process.

As stated, all I said was the word “no.”

TV’s Frink said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Didn’t realize you were involved in the production and in the know about what Disney requested, cool, my bad.

Was not saying that. I was merely wagering a guess as to why scenes were changed.

Considering the scenes in question had humor added to the version that was released, it stands to reason the people involved saw the rough cut and said there needs to be a humor beat here.

I think your first mistake is thinking those scenes were changed. Seems like those deleted scenes were in addition to, not instead of what’s there in the theatrical.

(second mistake would be assuming that if something got changed it had to be someone other than Rian making that decision)

I’m not assuming anything. I’m taking an educated guess based on my own industry experience and a knowledge of Johnson’s previous work. He’s not known for the kind of humor presented here, whereas its present in every new Star Wars release thus far, so it’s reasonable those kinds of decisions were made at a corporate level. And many scenes were very clearly alternate, if not necessarily the ones in question.

No, Rian has stated in multiple interviews that he wanted to put a lot of humor into the film.

Only because the Corporate Suits at Disney made him say it.

Shh, no duh, why do you think I’m defending the movie at all, Disney’s got my family held at gunpoint.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

You’re right. That was a very well thought out, positive response to a meaningless anecdote.

I didn’t say it wasn’t negative, just not hostile. In my mind a hostile post would have gone through all the ways you were wrong right off the bat, which would have been an overreaction considering your post was, like you say meaningless, so so was mine. I guess I could have said “you’re wrong,” or “that’s incorrect,” instead, might have been a bit more thought out, but I’m not sure how I could have responded in the positive to a post that’s totally inaccurate.

Tobar said:

DominicCobb said:

The Land Before Time (1988) - Would have been a great movie if the dinosaurs didn’t talk. C+

We can’t be friends.

DominicCobb said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

The Land Before Time (1988) - Would have been a great movie if the dinosaurs didn’t talk. C+

Dom is dead to me as well. And this one isn’t nostalgia, I’ve watched it in the last year. Still one of the best Don Bluth films.

I didn’t even say it was bad.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Didn’t realize you were involved in the production and in the know about what Disney requested, cool, my bad.

Was not saying that. I was merely wagering a guess as to why scenes were changed.

Considering the scenes in question had humor added to the version that was released, it stands to reason the people involved saw the rough cut and said there needs to be a humor beat here.

I think your first mistake is thinking those scenes were changed. Seems like those deleted scenes were in addition to, not instead of what’s there in the theatrical.

(second mistake would be assuming that if something got changed it had to be someone other than Rian making that decision)

I’m not assuming anything. I’m taking an educated guess based on my own industry experience and a knowledge of Johnson’s previous work. He’s not known for the kind of humor presented here, whereas its present in every new Star Wars release thus far, so it’s reasonable those kinds of decisions were made at a corporate level. And many scenes were very clearly alternate, if not necessarily the ones in question.

No, Rian has stated in multiple interviews that he wanted to put a lot of humor into the film.

At the end of the day I was nonchalantly wagering an educated guess to the behind the scenes thinking behind these particular changes and I still can’t wrap my head around why you’re responding with so much negative hostility.

That seems like an overstatement, my first post was literally just the word no.

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

The Land Before Time (1988) - Would have been a great movie if the dinosaurs didn’t talk. C+

Dom is dead to me as well. And this one isn’t nostalgia, I’ve watched it in the last year. Still one of the best Don Bluth films.

I didn’t even say it was bad.

Possessed said:

He does have a valid point though. As much as I love domino’s it does give me heartburn sometimes. I don’t have this problem with other pizza, but other pizza that’s actually decent isn’t usually cheap.

Yup, Domino’s is pretty much the only one that makes me feel sick even though it is decently tasty.

Darth Lucas said:

DominicCobb said:

Didn’t realize you were involved in the production and in the know about what Disney requested, cool, my bad.

Was not saying that. I was merely wagering a guess as to why scenes were changed.

Considering the scenes in question had humor added to the version that was released, it stands to reason the people involved saw the rough cut and said there needs to be a humor beat here.

I think your first mistake is thinking those scenes were changed. Seems like those deleted scenes were in addition to, not instead of what’s there in the theatrical.

(second mistake would be assuming that if something got changed it had to be someone other than Rian making that decision)

Didn’t realize you were involved in the production and in the know about what Disney requested, cool, my bad.