logo Sign In

DominicCobb

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Aug-2011
Last activity
20-Jun-2025
Posts
10,455

Post History

Post
#1193021
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Mocata said:

DominicCobb said:

Mocata said:

I’d rather see the version which had more Saw Gerrara as an actual character, and a finale where the group are actually together. It could still be a grey, lifeless marketing exercise but I’m not sure why he thinks this was an improvement.

I’m not sure why either of those would improve it. It sounds like the changes he made were narrowing the focus of the film and making the character motivations clearer. If anything, he didn’t go far enough.

Because those are character moments that are important for making me care about characters in a movie. As it stands I have no idea what Jyn and Saw were motivated by, beyond a few clichéd sound bites.

Well that’s under the assumption that those unused moments with Saw would provide his motivation, and that his motivation is necessary to the overall story. As is he’s ultimately not incredibly important to the narrative, so in my mind it makes sense to streamline his story if he’s out before the halfway point (and when there’s at least 8 other important characters that are still alive and relevant).

Post
#1193011
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Mocata said:

I’d rather see the version which had more Saw Gerrara as an actual character, and a finale where the group are actually together. It could still be a grey, lifeless marketing exercise but I’m not sure why he thinks this was an improvement.

I’m not sure why either of those would improve it. It sounds like the changes he made were narrowing the focus of the film and making the character motivations clearer. If anything, he didn’t go far enough.

Post
#1193008
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

DominicCobb said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Eh, I still don’t trust him. I have to know specifics about the original.

Okay but you don’t trust anyone so.

I trust a few people, but only if I know them well and have deemed them trustworthy. I don’t know who this Gilroy is other than that he’s someone who got paid millions to do reshoots on a Star Wars movie. Why should I trust him?

I don’t see why not. The only reason I can think of why he would lie is to flatter himself, which yeah it does sound a little like he might be exaggerating for that reason, but still he seems to speak rather candidly in a way that doesn’t reflect well upon the studio.

Post
#1192903
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Gilroy’s not the studio, he’s an unrelated filmmaker that they brought in. If he says it was a mess, I don’t see any reason to doubt that.

And his whole point was that the first thing he knew the movie needed was an underlying theme, and sacrifice is what he came up with.

I can’t speak to Fan4stic, but from what I understand a lot of problems arose because the director was hostile or something.

Reshoots are 90% of the time a good thing and legitimately done to try make the movie better, though this is something the internet doesn’t seem to understand.

And I got your meaning, but like I said Gilroy’s right, if everyone dies in the end, the movie should be about sacrifice (in addition to those things you mentioned). I tend to think if they had more time they could’ve nailed it.

Post
#1192799
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Proving that sometimes the simplest explanation is the correct one, Tony Gilroy confirms that the reshoots were done primarily because the film wasn’t that good:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/heat-vision/star-wars-rogue-one-writer-tony-gilroy-opens-up-reshoots-1100060?__twitter_impression=true

He seems to be pretty tight lipped in regards to Edwards and directing, though it sounds like they were more interested in fixing things rather than the nitty gritty of who’s the “director,” and ultimately he just sort of gradually became the go to guy by the end of it.