logo Sign In

Doctor M

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Feb-2005
Last activity
26-Jun-2025
Posts
2,544

Post History

Post
#1480933
Topic
Harry Potter Extended Editions (Released)
Time

I haven’t gotten to watch these yet, but I did notice an increased softness just skipping around after you released them. I did know you really wanted to go with the smaller file sizes, so I didn’t say anything.

Also, as far as audio and specific to my home setup, aac takes a double hit in lossy quality. My system re-encodes AAC to AC-3 in order to pass it to the tuner. AC-3, DTS are passed untouched and most lossless have the cores passed.
Like I said, that’s specific to my setup, so again, not worth mentioning.

Post
#1479348
Topic
'Raiders of the Lost Ark' - bluray and colour timing changes (Released)
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

Why is every release since Lowry so soft looking, and a heavy use of DNR.

You would hope a fresh 4K scan that is as sharp as possibly without artificially sharpening the image or using digital video noise reduction techniques, would be the next step for a 4K UHD release.

But knowing Paramount and Lucasfilm it will be the 4K Imax restoration with the messed up colors. Since that is also the current 4K DCP most likely.

Edit:
Well i watched the blu ray version again as it aired on thanksgiving on Paramount Network. I have no idea how this version ever was passed off as releasable. First you have the problem with Satipos face morphing at the beginning of the film and no consistency in the color timing from reel to reel, sharpness or anything really.
Some scenes are heavily DVNR’ed some are okay, but far too many are overexposed and Indy has sunburn in almost the entire movie with an orange face. The colors are overly muddy looking in places and others too much brightened. I hope this is not the version that makes it to 4K and we get a new scan.

Younger audiences don’t watch older movies. Just as silent and then black and white films have been ignored, films from ‘before you were born’ tend not to be watched. Film grain and older analog looking color timings are a dated look.

So like colorizing black and white, scrubbing the grain, inserting some CG effects and adding HDR gives a more modern & digital appearance that they hope will appeal to a younger customer base.

Post
#1475048
Topic
Harry Potter Extended Editions (Released)
Time

I haven’t grabbed this yet, but seeing the YouTube trailer, I have a question.
In Prisoner of Azkaban, early in the movie Harry eats a candy that makes him whistle and smoke like a steam engine.

The deleted scene that’s been added back, Harry eats a Pepper Imp from Honeydukes, which is different.
“They are actually quite fiery in nature, not only creating a chilli like flavor, but also actually allowing the consumer to breath fire. As a result, smoke also leaves the nose and ears making for quite the hilarious sight.”

It looks like he blows a smoke ring now in the trailer. You didn’t go with fire? Did you add any sound effects to go with it?

Post
#1470846
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

Probably true, stwd4nder2. My TVs with HDR are early in the tech, but I feel most of the time it’s more like when you go to an electronics store and they are demoing the TVs in torch mode.

Still, I can’t imagine any director or cinematographer more than 6 or 7 years ago intending their work to look anything like what HDR does to it. Heck, when HDR first came out, they had to teach a lot of filmmakers what it was. Anyway, I guess we’re mostly off topic now.

Post
#1470675
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

That sounds about right.

I’m not a huge fan of HDR. I completely believe it’s the modern equivalent of colorizing a black and white film.
You are extracting light levels and colors from a film print (or in this case a computer) that the original creators had no expectations people would see.
I don’t understand why more purists aren’t against it since it isn’t the intent of the filmmakers.

So, the Diamond Edition is probably the last best version. Of course there is still the IMAX reanimation, but unless you’re going to scan a film print, I don’t think we can do more accurate than the LD, which is never going to look great.

Anyone know if “Aladdin 1992 720p HDTV DD5.1 x264-ESiR” is before the IMAX changes?

Post
#1470622
Topic
Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

So. For those looking to upgrade Aladdin from ADigitalMan’s restoration, I noticed yesterday that someone is sharing a theatrical DTS audio track that can be synced to the Blu-ray’s video.

That was news to me. I suppose I should update the first post with details of that.

But here is my concern: I have no idea what the quality of the BD’s audio track is, if the mix is good, the source of the theatrical bits (besides “original motion picture soundtrack”, which doesn’t explain where a possible change to the “Good kitty” line came from), or the fact that the whole thing has to have been re-encoded to DTS if edits were made.

Yeah. Anyone know anything about what I apparently don’t know what I’m talking about?

Edit: And another question. I see the UHD disc and Signature BD have a new AR of 1.66:1. Blu-ray.com claims it opens up the borders and presents the ‘intended’ aspect ratio, but IMDb says that’s the negative’s ratio, but the intended is 1.85:1, which would make the Diamond Edition the preferred video source.

Thoughts here?

Post
#1467884
Topic
HELP! Synchronizing dub audio track taken from VHS with MKV (ESB 97 SE)
Time

My first project was similar. I was syncing another audio track to a SW preservation and I realized that the video and audio, being from different masters, tended to go out of sync at the reel changes (about every 20 minutes). It’s because of missing or extra frames when they edit it together.

Additionally, VHS recordings, being analog, may be sped up or slowed down because of recording or playback equipment. It’s usually tiny, but it becomes additive over time.

Post
#1467293
Topic
The Muppets Take The Bowl
Time

Thinking about this today, I always assumed Disney was filming “The Muppets Take The Bowl” for a future home video release.
5 years later, I guess that was not the plan.

Searching the net, I found a guy who trades discs claiming to have this show complete as a 2-DVD collection.
Has anyone seen this or found this show anywhere?

Most people claim it’s Disney’s best Muppet production, which just makes me sadder that it seems to be gone (outside of some YouTube bits).

Edit: I did see someone has posted The Muppets Take the O2 edited together as a complete show from random shaky cam footage. There is some overlap.