Dek Rollins

^Same. Most people I talk to around my age refuse to watch any movie made pre-2000 because they’re so old, and then I contradict them when they watch (or speak of watching) movies like Forest Gump. A lot of my friends joke that I’m the reincarnation of some guy from the 19th century, because I like some older things. So, the product of a generation thing probably happens to most, then the exceptions are those who were properly exposed to older things throughout their childhood, without being given an overly biased opinion from someone else, regarding “new is always better”.

EDIT: Also, I just thought it would be funny to mention, sometime last year, I had to explain to one of my friends what the difference is between good CGI and bad CGI.

Dylanlip said:

====
NES - RGB Modded
SNES - RGB & Digital Coax Modded
N64 - HDMI Modded
PS1 w/ Stock RGB
PS4
Dreamcast
GameCube w/ D-Terminal
====

No Mega Drive?

ray_afraid said:

^OT stormtroopers aren’t clones. They’re all different heights and sizes and they all have different voices.
But, that may have been what Georgy was goin’ for… I don’t remember.

I believe he was referring to the fact that they made the clones the storm trooper equivalent in the story, rather than the clones being the enemy. My personal belief is that the clone part of the Clone Wars was a Mandolorian clone army that the old Republic (storm troopers) fought against. Making the storm troopers clones in the PT also started the fan confusion about them being clones in the OT.

Okay, sorry. Let’s just get back on topic, and I’ll try not to get banned for my minor offense here. And of coarse, sand is quite course.

So, to get back on topic, I don’t like the sand in TFA. It’s course, and it gets everywhere.

EDIT:

TV’s Frink said:

I can’t wait for your warning…

Wait, what warning? For being off topic? I made two off topic posts here.

EDIT: Sorry, 4.5 off topic posts.

I was just pointing out that you telling Frink that he knows nothing of the character when you can’t possibly know all there is, because you didn’t create any iteration of the character yourself. You may have opinions about what you interpret from the character(s) you’ve encountered, but you can’t claim you have more knowledge on how the character should be, and to say that Frinks opinion doesn’t matter is just as well as me saying your opinion doesn’t matter. Because it doesn’t. And neither does mine, come to think of it.

_Shorty said:

It is available via popular public torrent sites…

A commentary track by Harmy?

DuracellEnergizer said:

TV’s Frink said:

I thought we all agreed that you were wrong?

I thought we all agreed you know jackshit about the character and thus any opinion you have on how he should be interpreted is next to worthless?

Also, you don’t know anything more about the character than Frink does, because <insert what possessed said>. You can’t just claim that you know more about a fictional character if you weren’t the creator/writer for said character at some point. And, no, nobody agreed to that statement. You also ended your statement with a question mark.

DuracellEnergizer said:

…Trek knockoff…

I wouldn’t really label it as a Trek knockoff, I mean, Stargate was a reasonably fine sci-fi action film. SG-1 was just loosely based on that, with a little more “trek” added.

^^I looked at that earlier today, too. I just never think about posting those when I see them.

An AVCHD would be nice. I was thinking of making a DVD-9 set for someone I know and thought that this CC would be more ideal to give him. Anyway, this is looking great, and I thank you for building on to Harmy’s great work like this to hold us over till we get Harmy’s own CC for v3.0 (or whenever).

I posted this somewhere else in response to something, but I just thought of it and decided to put it in this thread since it fits.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt9zSfinwFA&feature=youtu.be&t=1m54s

DuracellEnergizer said:

…used to hate Stargate SG-1…

You mean you like it now? I’d have more respect for it if it really was called “MacGyver in Space”. Though I don’t have any respect for MacGyver past the pilot episode, so that probably wouldn’t be a very big margin.

DuracellEnergizer said:

In other words, he’d have no reason to “play up” Clark since Superman himself is already innately played up.

It isn’t entirely unrealistic that he over did it. That’s what I said before, rather than being a boring average joe, he wanted to appear a polar opposite.

Sorry, I looked for it earlier, just typed in “blade runner”, didn’t work, so I did “bladerunner”, didn’t work, so I checked for some other things. Searched “35mm”, and only three things came up, meaning all of those other things must have been deleted, and that just made me think that the holocaust had already occurred. When I search now, everything comes up as normal. I just don’t know what happened. Thanks for replying.

This appears to have been removed from the spleen in the recent happening. I wasn’t able to acquire it before it was gone, and I was really looking forward to seeing it. To get to the point, will this be put up anywhere else in the future? Or was it already put up somewhere else?

EDIT: Even if I can’t get it somewhere, I want to find the “no narration” audio track at least. Thanks to anyone who can help me out.

I’ve always attributed the clumsy, bumbling, cowardly, to him trying to hide any ideas that he’s Superman. He wants to keep his identities unknown, and his decision to be without a mask as Superman means he needs to keep people he knows from seeing through it.

Also, do you remember when Superman: The Movie and Superman II were made? 1978 and 1979 definitely happened before 1985. And I’m also curious as to the way in which the things you’ve mentioned treated this subject. How was Clark Kent portrayed differently from Superman in these? etc…

I watched Jurassic World on my TV first, without seeing it in theaters, and the CGI looked awful. Though 4K projection would probably make it look worse. I guess I’m glad I didn’t see it that way.

I was referring to the specific joke that was posted, not the show as a whole. I’ve never watched it, so I couldn’t tell you my opinion on the overall series.

DuracellEnergizer said:

…I’m not a fan of any variation of the “Superman is the real person, Clark is the disguise” idea…

Okay, I’m not trying to say “your wrong”, but, that’s literally how the character works. Kal-El is an alien from Krypton, raised by humans on Earth from infancy (given the name Clark Kent), and he disguises himself as a human to fit in with the other humans. He just overdoes it a lot.

^^Ha! You posted just as I edited my post to include the link.

TN1’s SW Silver Screen Edition is the Grindhouse equivalent.

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/id/14590/