- Post
- #471911
- Topic
- THIS TOPIC MEANS NOTHING DO NOT POST IF YOU DONT WONT TO BURN IN SUPER HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/471911/action/topic#471911
- Time

Darth Mallwalker
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 25-Sep-2004
- Last activity
- 29-Dec-2017
- Posts
- 1,376
Post History
- Post
- #471866
- Topic
- Can a Laptop Blu-Ray Burner not be able to Burn Dual Layer DVD Rs?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/471866/action/topic#471866
- Time
Almost five years ago I got new laptop. I thought "It's gonna be great" having a DL burner in my laptop. I was stoked
Luke said:
What a piece of junk!
Actually it's a Slimtype model, built by LiteOn. The hardware itself should have been 'good enough' but the firmware spoils it.
You see it's "specially customized for Gateway" firmware. That means brain-dead, certain features disabled, and the like.
For example most LiteOn drives, with LiteOn firmware, are capable to change the book-type bit on DVD+R media. Gateway firmware won't do it, and here's the rub: Gateway ain't offering any firmware updates!
Back on topic, Can you give us any more clues besides "laptop" ?
A vendor name like Gateway probably won't be enough.
Can you tell us the drive's make/model, and especially its firmware version?
If you're running Windows, you might find that in Device Manager.
Or better yet, ImgBurn should give it to you straight.
Does your drive use a laptop vendor's proprietary firmware?
Does that vendor offer firmware updates?
Is it possible to flash your drive with drive manufacturer's firmware, instead of laptop vendor's "custom" version?
- Post
- #469435
- Topic
- <em><strong>The Official Dark/Sega Special Collection</strong></em> OT LD Release Thread (Not an SE Transfer) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/469435/action/topic#469435
- Time
They're there, since October.
Search Dark-Sega with a hyphen instead of a slash.
Arnie.d V8 is there too since 578 days. Holler back if your provider doesn't offer that much retention.
Bang your head . . . wake the dead
Great necropost!
- Post
- #468582
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Pre-'93 Japanese Special Collection LD transfers?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468582/action/topic#468582
- Time
msycamore said: And sequels... did they have the same issue as SW? or do sequels mean something else in this case?
sequels mean ESB & ROTJ wearing SWE jackets, mastered by Technidisc in 1993-94
To my knowledge, they didn't suffer any 'incredible shrinking ratio' like ANH, so maybe they were never remastered, or retelecine or whatever.
It's possible they're made from same master tape as earlier Pioneer pressing SWE, and presumably JSC, so they'd be missing few frames between reels in that case.
On the other hand, if they'd been remastered from '93 telecine they should indclude (nearly) all frames as GOUT, but without THX smear. [This appears to be the case for ANH, at first glance anyway.]
They were cheap enough, so I decided to take the chance and try to answer that question. This is the hypothesis, to prove or disprove...
- Post
- #468568
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Pre-'93 Japanese Special Collection LD transfers?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468568/action/topic#468568
- Time
Haven't transcribed the mint marks from the sequels yet, but I will...
No secrets
You should do that set d_j
Lot cheaper than JSC on eBay too, I'll tell ya
Your rendition could easily become the 'best currently available'
- Post
- #468564
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Pre-'93 Japanese Special Collection LD transfers?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468564/action/topic#468564
- Time
Maybe you should go back and read Post 8 of that thread.
It doesn't keep any secrets.
Red5 nailed it in Post 7 and I came clean in 8
Catalog number, and even the mint markings of my LD are in the LDDB link provided.
And do you know what else? That ANH LD isn't so lonely anymore. It now has sequels sitting beside it, which I've received from eBay this past week, both also coming from the same Technidisc factory in the post-DC era, and without THX certification.
Haven't watched 'em yet -- we'll see if they're 'interesting' like the first one...
- Post
- #468444
- Topic
- Scariest Movies
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468444/action/topic#468444
- Time
TV mini-series Salem's Lot scared me quite a bit back in 1979
- Post
- #468439
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Pre-'93 Japanese Special Collection LD transfers?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468439/action/topic#468439
- Time
Dark-Sega JSC trilogy is on a.b.starwars since October.
Don't know if that's what zombie84 is talking about.
It's 4:3 letterbox not anamorphic, 30fps interlaced not IVTC'ed.
Preservations of SWE LD's by dark_jedi and Rikter are also 4:3 & 30fps
Zion threatened to upload some of the raw X0 captures.
If he's gonna do that, I'd rather see the JSC ones than any THX/DC/Face
- Post
- #468036
- Topic
- Theater Performance Preservations
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/468036/action/topic#468036
- Time
Make mine Coke with cane sugar, Senor!
Have only sampled the Catnip -- scanned for all five reel change cues, including the coference room. All present and accounted right where they're expected to be.
Do you think the shape of the cue dots, anamorphically stretched and all, can offer clues about being 35mm source or 16mm reduction?
Color bars don't seem to have any pluge -- is that right terminology?
Is it useful for luma adjustments, or merely chroma?
- Post
- #467998
- Topic
- Theater Performance Preservations
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/467998/action/topic#467998
- Time
said:
77_ANH_BOOTLEG
Wow, speak of the devil!
not to mention ... devil-horns

U rock again
I'm gonna start callin' u %25, May i?
- Post
- #467997
- Topic
- Info Wanted: OT Definitive Collection on DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/467997/action/topic#467997
- Time
zombie84 said:
They don't have the interviews that were on the DC though; most of the earlier fan transfers didn't either, but there is a bonus disc out there that someone made with the interviews collected on it, but it's probably hard to find. Frankly, the bonus material was equally parts weak and short so you aren't really missing much, just pull out your Laserdisc if you want to watch them.
Dr_Gonzo's fourth disc (Supplemental Materials) has nearly all that stuff from DC preserved.
And another 4th disc by Farsight @myspleen.
Those two might not be so hard to find . . . from a certain point of view
The Aluminum Falcon said:
Out of curiosity and I apologize for getting a bit off-topic but has there ever been a preservation/transfer of that first issue VHS rental tape: both video and audio? I can't seem to find a thread about a transfer of it.
The Starkiller said:
*******************************************************************************
Star Wars 1982 "Video Rental Library" VHS Transfer
*******************************************************************************
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Information
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type.................: DVD
Size.................: 4.23 GB
Video Format.........: DVD / VIDEO_TS Folder / NTSC / Full Screen
Audio Format.........: Dolby Digital 2.0 192Kbps
MPEG 2.0 192Kbps
Source...............: 1982 Video Rental Library VHS
Original Format......: NTSC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post Information
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by............: The Starkiller
Posted to............: alt.binaries.starwars
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Release Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a transfer of the 1982 Star Wars "Video Rental Library" videocassette.
This VHS tape was the first ever commercial home video release of Star Wars. It
features a full screen pan and scan transfer along with the original 1977 Dolby
Stereo sound mix.
Dollstalker said:
U wanna see it up there?
- Post
- #467920
- Topic
- Theater Performance Preservations
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/467920/action/topic#467920
- Time
dark_jedi said:
newsgroups?
Attn: Mr. TwentyFifth
(who's not afraid showing his real email address
@1977.com>
u r r0x0r!!! x0x0x0
y u no postet MayBeJedi 77_ANH_BOOTLEG ?
(previously by segaflip@2005-10-25)
U wanna see it up there?
- Post
- #465776
- Topic
- Star Wars OT & 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/465776/action/topic#465776
- Time
Post 225Belbucus said:
My tolerance in synching these by ear was in the neighborhood of 10 samples
- Post
- #465492
- Topic
- The Mono Mix Restoration Project (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/465492/action/topic#465492
- Time
Molly's torrent of Moth3r's file ain't dead yet...
- Post
- #465423
- Topic
- Complete Comparison of Special Edition Visual Changes
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/465423/action/topic#465423
- Time
Treadwell said:
1. There was some discussion of missing or extra frames here and there, namely fading out/in to Threepio in the oilbath, or the TIEs approaching the Death Star in comp 60. These are reel change points--as such, it is common for one transfer to have a few frames more or less than another, as they have to be either put together later in the video realm, or the reels edited together in real time during the telecine.
Welcome aboard, Treadwell
I've done a bit of research myself on reel changeover points, so my ears perked up when I read that part of your message.
Shirley the oilbath is the start of a reel. We have glaring evidence in the form of a motor cue dot after Threepio's line "...beyond my capacity" in one of the telecine bootlegs.
However, I'll join with msycamore in questioning your assertion that 60 is a changeover point. It doesn't match my findings.
That's the method I've used in my research -- I compared every transfer ever made ;) ;) ;)Treadwell said:
they are the kind of thing that will be found between every transfer ever made (not just original/SE),
No but I compared several laserdiscs, and noted the differences.
Somewhere around here I've compiled my findings into a thread called 'reel lengths' or something like that. As I said in there, corrections are certainly welcome. If you can set me straight, I'm all ears. Treadwell, can you offer any clues why you believe 60 is a reel change?
- Post
- #465406
- Topic
- The Mono Mix Restoration Project (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/465406/action/topic#465406
- Time
Way to go hairy_hen!
Don't forget the original WAV contains extra RIFF chunks, besides the canonical ones. Way back then for its initial distribution, Moth3r chose WavPack to preserve those extra chunks because old FLAC versions won't.
Nowadays modern FLAC versions can do it, just be sure to use the --keep-foreign-metadata option.
For whatever it's worth, m48 dvd.wav's so-called FLAC fingerprint (FFP) is something like:
F9AA ... 12C9
- Post
- #463430
- Topic
- ot.com Dance Party!!!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/463430/action/topic#463430
- Time
- Post
- #463259
- Topic
- Star Wars 1977 70mm sound mix recreation [stereo and 5.1 versions now available] (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/463259/action/topic#463259
- Time
Y'all sound like LFL with your relaxed QC standards.
The color-blind might tell you: Don't bother with the color timing.
Tone-deaf ones could say PAL speedup isn't an issue, yet others are bothered by it.
The ones who can detect ~60ms time-shift will call your support hotline to complain, and then what will you tell them?
"deliberate creative decision"
Let's put an end to this "perpetuation of amateurism" ha ha ha
- Post
- #462465
- Topic
- The Definitive Collection Flaw List (1993 Laserdisc Box Set)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/462465/action/topic#462465
- Time
Sounds like this 33250.WAV
That's ripped, not captured.
Ripped three times, bit-perfect compare, blah blah blah ... I sound like TraySock tooting my own horn
- Post
- #462448
- Topic
- The Definitive Collection Flaw List (1993 Laserdisc Box Set)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/462448/action/topic#462448
- Time
hairy_hen said:
Not on this list is the jump-cut in the music at the beginning of the carbon freeze scene,
Sure, it's #8 on the list, is it not?
Here's my 28665. It's the beginning of a reel, which goes a little way toward explaining how the mistake could've happened

I'll grab 33250 from ANH stay tuned....
- Post
- #462258
- Topic
- Info: Star Wars Laser Disc 1989 I found the same problem in the 1992 version "Incredible Shrinking Ratio"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/462258/action/topic#462258
- Time
It's one of those things I might've read before, maybe when Moth3r posted the link,
but that was a long time ago ... and I hadn't acquired my DC yet.
I'm glad none posted it again; I enjoyed reading it (again) from an owner's perspective.
Pulled out my ROTJ to check Jabba subs (they're wrong) and also the three flaws mentioned on side 5 got me curious.
Here's one of them, which confirms what I've already suspected by the missing Leia welding, that mine is the flawed early pressing:
Also want to thank Moth3r for the Mitsubishi screen caps. With younglings about, it's impressive you've found the time to do it.
In my own mind I'm quite skeptical that Mitsubishi ever pressed a corrected one. It would've meant cutting new masters and retooling their presses.
By the time that might've taken to do that, I suspect the contract had already been given to Technidisc.
This bit from the top of that flaw list caught my eye:
THX.htm said:
As some of you have heard, the non-THX CLV versions of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi have been put on moratorium. The THX box set however is still available. New THX-certified, CLV vers- ions of the THX masters are being released in a few weeks.
Written in 1995 anticipating the 'face' releases, that would mean the Technidisc SWE 'fixed' pressings were in print for two full years, from Summer'93 to Summer'95
- Post
- #461738
- Topic
- Give Other Members a New Username
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/461738/action/topic#461738
- Time
hairy_hen --> bigf00t
- Post
- #461724
- Topic
- Give Other Members a New Username
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/461724/action/topic#461724
- Time
Moth3r --> Mothr4
- Post
- #460244
- Topic
- RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/460244/action/topic#460244
- Time
Chewtobacca said:
If someone can post the exact delay value, that would be good.
Darth Mallwalker said:
Yes he did. satanika, I reckon
It's on usenet 544 days. 549 as I'm typing this
Search 'audio for GOUT projects' belbucus_delay_values.png
If that doesn't work, send me PM
Use that value if-and-only-if Harmy's STAR WARS card appear at frame 689, like NTSC GOUT.
(690th frame, since first frame is called 0 -- I'm going by memory here, so double-check)
If Harmy's title card comes something other than 689, I'm confident you'll get it sorted...
- Post
- #459320
- Topic
- RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/459320/action/topic#459320
- Time
Wee bit confused here, since Belbucus didn't do a 5.1 (did he?)Chewtobacca said:
I'll just use Belbucus' stereo PCM re-encoded to AC-3, unless people really want his 5.1 upmix. :-)
Were you thinking of applying prologic algorithms yourself to Belbucus' PCM?
On the off-chance you're looking at the 5.1 upmix posted to usenet 544 days, be aware it's hairy_hen's not Belbucus', and it's obsolete, superseded...
hairy_hen's recent upgrade seems a no-brainer in that case.Harmy said:
Perhaps it would be good to use the 5.1 to keep suit with Ady's Empire.
What bitrate did satanika use for that one? Would it fit on DVD5?