kk650 said:
Darth Lucas said:
I’m gonna come across as a bit of a dick here so I apologize in advance.
I see very little difference between the TFA shots. Actually at first glance, I thought you had accidentally posted the same pictures twice. Wasn’t until I looked really closely that I could see the very slight change in the skintones. I guess if that minuscule difference is something that really bothers you then more power to you, I just don’t see how it’s a difference anyone could notice or care about on casual viewing.
No worries, you don’t last long as a regrader without developing thick skin haha. I don’t see anything dickish about what you wrote there though to be honest, until a couple of years ago I was exactly like you, I didn’t really notice or care whether fleshtones looked too red/green/blue, all I cared about was removing blanket tints, it was creating the V2 Star Wars Semi-Specialised Editions that really opened my eyes in that regard and made me a lot more sensitive to fleshtones. Now its the first thing I look at when regrading because fleshtones are actually really important. When a viewer is watching a film he/she actually spends the majority of the film focused on the faces of the characters which is completely normal, like our eyes gravitate towards a person’s face in a photograph, our brains are hardwired to lock onto faces. I completely understand where you’re coming from because I used to be exactly the same, that’s why i’ve been so surprised that the regrade for The Force Awakens has been as popular as it has been.
Oh I get it. I notice flesh tones too, I was just saying I don’t really have a problem with the flesh tones in TFA. They don’t seem “too red” to me. They look pretty natural. I’m used to your corrections being more dramatic, so the fact that it’s so subtle made me not notice right away. And given that the flesh tones don’t really bother me, I was just saying I don’t see how it would really make a difference on casual viewing.