logo Sign In

Darth Id

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
24-Aug-2010
Last activity
16-Jun-2017
Posts
1,390

Post History

Post
#792300
Topic
GOOD things about the prequels?
Time

hairy_hen said:

Pretty much everything about that scene, from the way it was written, shot, and edited, is just plain bad. 

 But...but...without that scene, we wouldn't know why Palps was all wrinkly and shit.

I distinctly remember watching RotJ as a kid and thinking:

Why is the Emperor all wrinkly?   There must be some pat explanation for that.

I sure hope they make a movie one day that accounts for all those wrinkles in one single, climactic scene!

Post
#788368
Topic
Movies that were updated, then the original was "lost"(other than Star Wars)
Time

JayArgonaut said:

I completely forgot about this one and I'm surprised no-one else has picked up on it. The theatrical release of Avatar in its 2.35:1 (2D) OAR is unavailable. On TV and home video, it's shown in Cameron's preferred 1.78:1 though there's a debate here regarding which version shows you more information...  

 I remember that debate--it's not over whether the BD release shows more information than the theatrical (it unquestionably does) but rather whether the additional information benefits or detracts from the movie.

(I say bring on the full screen, but apparently some people just love they letterboxin'...)

Post
#787429
Topic
Why "Ben"?
Time

ATMachine said:

Darth Id said:

John Doom said:

I suspect it's either as Tobar said, or that he changed his name into "Ben" before serving the Organas in the Clone Wars.

 Nope--sorry, but Ben is just his name.  That's all.

 Sorry. That hasn't been true since the fourth-draft script of Star Wars from early 1976.

 Oh, well THAT expl--

...wait, wut?

Post
#787313
Topic
Movies that were updated, then the original was "lost"(other than Star Wars)
Time

Neglify said:

Darth Id said:

a couple kids actually called 1-800-SPANK-ME and were redirected to a 900 number phone sex line and racked up over $500 in charges.

Sorry but that does not happen.  You, sir, have been had.

Who told you that little urban legend?  Was it Ben?

Seattle Times article from 1997: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19971019&slug=2566882 

 I can't tell if you're making some meta-joke about leg-pulling, or if you just pasted a botched link, but I just get the search function for the Seattle Times (aka, the "Lying Ol' Ben" of Journalism).

Post
#787266
Topic
Why "Ben"?
Time

"Ben" being the alias isn't any more-or-less an elaborate solution than "Obi-Wan" being the alias.

Except that "Ben" is a name, while "Obi-Wan" is some strange mystical title.

But you know what?  You guys are right.  We need to get to the bottom of this deep perplexing enigma.

And while we're at it, we need to figure out why they kept calling Mark Hamill's character "Luke Skywalker," since it's my subjective opinion that his name is actually Schnarzle Shnuzzle.  It just doesn't make sense! 

Damn you George Lucas for never explaining why they all keep calling Schnarzle "Luke"!

Damn You!!!!!

Post
#787154
Topic
Movies that were updated, then the original was "lost"(other than Star Wars)
Time

SilverWook said:

Ronster said:

The Shining (Stanley Kubrick) The film was recalled whilst in theaters and the ending was removed to make a new ending by Stanley Kubrick's request then all the footage was destroyed except save one reel apparently the estate may be in possession of it.

 Not recalled, Kubrick sent assistants around to each theater to physically cut the hospital scene. Movies didn't open on as many screens back then as they do now, so this wasn't as monumental a task as it seems.

http://www.theoverlookhotel.com/post/41259062113/screenplay-for-the-deleted-original-ending-of-the

 Still pretty crazy though!  That's fascinating.

I've had mercurial, demanding bosses, but that guy...

Post
#787151
Topic
Why "Ben"?
Time

1.  Yes it does.

2.  Ben Kenobi's name is not a "subjective opinion".  It's, like, in the movie. You know, the movie about Ben Kenobi?

Any additional speculation not only violates Occam's Razor, but is in fact the height of obsessive, fruitless fanboy obscurantism because it's all an elaborate solution in search of a puzzle.  I mean, who on earth would ever think to come up with wild, convoluted theoriews on "why did people keep calling that guy in the movie 'Ben' and also he answered to the name???  We've got to figure out this deep mystery!"????

Is it a "subjective opinion" that my avatar is "Darth Id," or do we all need to start generating elaborate EU-style epicyclical "theories" on why it always says "Darth Id" next to my comments?

Post
#786374
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

-50
    The Republic becomes the Empire.
        "[...] in the Old Republic. Before the dark times,
        before the Empire."

This is a non sequitur

Nothing Ben says necessarily means that HE was personally present for the birth of the Empire, or personally remembers it.  He is just discussing a World That Was, that he may only have heard about from his trainer, as one of the dwindling followers of the Force.  He could have been trained in the Jedi arts by a rogue Jedi long after the Jedi Knights had been ousted as official guardians. 

It could have been generations of secretive, hermit-style heretical Jedi, who were always fighting on the side of the various oppositions to the Empire.  Plus Ben could have been 120, and could have trained Anakin when he was already 60.

    The Jedi Order is disbanded by the Emperor
        "the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice
        in the Old Republic. Before the dark times, before the Empire."
    The Jedi are persecuted
        ?
    Obi-wan flees in "exile" and assumes a new identity.
        "I haven't gone by the name Obi-Wan since oh, before you were born."

Again, you're unconsciously subscribing to PT plot-points that were not necessarily part of the SW backstory.  The Jedi Order could have been deposed generations earlier--they were no longer "guardians" of the established political order, but were instead outcasts and rogues, fighting on the side of Good.  The whole Clone Wars business could very well have been (and I actually think WAS) entirely a post-Imperial course of events.

Yes Ben fought with Leia's father, and then had to go into exile at some point afterward, but that doesn't mean it all happened in one big, pat, tidy singularity as the PT would have it.

Remember, SW was supposed to be a sprawling, sweeping world of Mystery & Magic, with ancient histories and dark secrets.  Only later did Georgie-poo decide to boil it all down to one narrow, obsessively focused domino chain.