PAL "gout" as a bias? Yes, because the overscan bars were removed.
1. use the retail PAL GOUT as a basis because it has slightly more resolution
kamyio said:
No sir, this isn't the normal red and blue 3D, trust me I've watched those and even the attempts on making stereoscopic (Avatar 3D like) have been embarrassing, no I'm using a multitude of different scripts and editors that allow me to choose the objects and pieces for 3D as well as the depth at which the pieces are at. <span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: normal; font-size: 17px; border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"> </span>
Jaitea said:
Absolutely beautiful, but would be hard to tie into the previous fly-through shot which ends on the existing buildings.
J
Yeah, this is why I'm confused. To my knowledge you simply can't fit 640kbit audio on an LD, and the '97 LD is undisputably 384kbit.
DE
captainsolo said:
Did Ady ever upload his 640kbit/s unedited tracks for ANH and ROTJ?
adywan said:
VHS conatins only 250 (?) vertical lines resolution.
No, not retail software, things like converting to 3D scripts etc.
Darth Solo said:
I thought the idea maybe technically flawed, but i ment feezer not fridge.
Leave the refrigerator door open
So when you upscale a DVD to HD and the pixels match perfectly doesn't that mean that the correct ratio of a* widescreen DVD is in fact 1024x576.
Even after effects up until cs4 had the aspect ratio resized to 1024 x 576.
WINDVD also resized PAL widescreen to 1024 x 576 so it seems that many players use this standard
adywan said:
sorry DE but i have to disagree there.
adywan said:
The HD source was downscaled to 1024 x 576 and would have been scaled down to 720 x 576 and 720 x 480 for the respective PAL & NTSC DVD's.
Chewtobacca said:
Yes; the Death Star looks really good. The improvement in the Star Destroyer is even more marked, in my opinion. I am really excited about the new version of your edit. The color correction pictures look amazing.
I thought this was for blu-ray. I have always been told that unless I am viewing a blu-ray on exact scan I am not getting the full picture quality. This is what I set my TV to every time I watch blu-ray.
Why is ovescan unrelated to NAB? When I looked at NAB in that wikipedia article it seemed to relate it to overscan. No doubt I've misunderstood again. :-)
From what I read it seems that this 1050 instead of 1024 business is just because if you resize exactly to 1024 people with old sets lose part of the picture, as it then seems "lifted" slightly on their screens when it overscans. I don't think this affects the AR itself though. Isn't it more the scope of the film?
Chewtobacca said:
Thanks for your explanation, DE. I'm still a little in the dark though. :-) (Sorry to talk about this in your thread.)
These black bars are designed for old non-HDTVs that overscan, are they?
If you view many DVDs on your widescreen television on exact scan (or just scan, whatever the manufacturer calls 1:1) you can see the black bars. Would your TV be functioning as a square pixel display in this case, or is it just monitors?
I was just taking snapshots of my sources into photoshop, measuring the pixels of visible image, calculating the aspect ratio accordingly and resizing. I take it I did right?
I am sorry to be a massive pain in the neck, but this is a new thing to me. Can you explain exactly what you did with the Death Star footage?
It's down to nominal analogue blanking.
The 8 pixels at either edge (strictly, PAL borders are 9 pixels but 8 is sometimes an easier number to work with) are to be treated as "garbage", and not included in any size/aspect ratio calculations.
HD doesn't have NAB, so an HD picture should be scaled down to 704x576 and padded (although 704x576 is also valid for DVD video, so you could skip padding it to 720).
Likewise, to display 720x576 anamorphic video on a square-pixel display, it should be cropped to 702 and scaled up to 1024x576 (a 16:9 frame). Almost equivalently, you can skip the cropping and scale to ~1050x576.
DE
Umm, wasn't there only ever one release of the 97 SE on Laserdisc with 5.1 audio?
Or is it some video capture you're after (as opposed to a rip).
DE
Is there any chance to release an upscale HD version from the existing DVD9 material? There are many great up scaling programs
And yet see above where my anecdotal evidence says the opposite ;)
DE
Drives work at a range of speeds, and on many occassions I've told people to burn at the slowest available speed and it's solved playback problems on DVD players. If the highest speed was the best, why provide the others?
DE
Chewtobacca said:
Do DJ and DE have any thoughts on this?
TV's Frink said:
EDIT: Not quite fast enough, was I Ady?
I had no trouble at all with AviSynth, etc, when I moved from 32 to 64 bit (still on Windows XP though). Just don't try to use the 64 bit versions of these things.
DE
Lazy Lucas, was Lazy. said:
hey everybody, thanx for rembering me...
After waiting an unusually long time for this to happen, I can tell you that the answer is... I don't know, because I forget to do that.
But I did follow a link from the second (logged out) page, and I was still logged out in the new tab, if that helps.
DE