logo Sign In

CompMovieGuy

User Group
Members
Join date
22-Mar-2009
Last activity
6-Jul-2016
Posts
375

Post History

Post
#438916
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

CompMovieGuy said:

Rule 2: Any and all pictures directly inserted into the thread constitutes an unreasonable post.
(if you have a picture to share of something reasonable and pertaining to the conversation, then use a direct link URL. If the direct link URL leads to a stupid picture and/or fink-ism, a warning will be handed out and so on and so forth)

Warned for violation of visible picture rule

Edit: In fact, not warned, since you are the same person, both moved to Unreasonable

Post
#438895
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

CompMovieGuy said:

Rule 2: Any and all pictures directly inserted into the thread constitutes an unreasonable post.
(if you have a picture to share of something reasonable and pertaining to the conversation, then use a direct link URL. If the direct link URL leads to a stupid picture and/or fink-ism, a warning will be handed out and so on and so forth)

Warned for violation of stupid picture rule

Post
#438312
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

Bingowings said:

None of the films capture the sense of isolation punctuated by sudden scares that the games do either.

Everytime a film comes out rumours circulate about a more faithful reboot.

Perhaps you might get your wish with the 5th film, when Uwe Boll takes over for PWSA, I think you would like this

:-)

Post
#438306
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

Yes, I know he decided to direct the new one but it isnt out yet (at least I dont think it is, Im not sure :-/ )

But I do agree with you, I have never been a real big Milla fan and I know its focused on her but I dont totally follow the games and their storylines.....I tried to play Resident Evil 1 when it came out on PS1 and I got tired of it and never finished it or played the others.....I know, I know

Post
#438109
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

TV's Frink said:

Regarding updating FX, I always thought Last Crusade could use some cleanup of the bad compositing work, like during the airplane battle scenes.

I actually like Last Crusade and its FXs, seeing things that are done with blue screens (tank falling scene comes to mind) actually brings me back to a time when everything wasnt done on computer and didnt look so fake

I guess Last Crusade could use some touch ups, but knowing Lucas and Mr S, they would go overboard and completely ruin the experience by either
A. Adding aliens somehow to the final product
B. Making the collapse of the "Grail Temple" end with a ring shockwave
or
C. Adding in a Transformer and saying this was the original vision

Granted, these are over the top examples, but Im just saying, whats next? CGI monkeys in Wizard of Oz?

Post
#438017
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

Im sorry Sluggo, but I have to put you on warning for breaking Rule 2

CompMovieGuy said:

Rule 2: Any and all pictures directly inserted into the thread constitutes an unreasonable post.
(if you have a picture to share of something reasonable and pertaining to the conversation, then use a direct link URL. If the direct link URL leads to a stupid picture and/or fink-ism, a warning will be handed out and so on and so forth)

Davnes007, I would hope they would couple a new version with the old, but I wonder if they would split them up and sell them separate and then couple them together.

Just a thought I had since GB 3 seems to be happening as much as I dont want it to. An introduction of a "new crew" and who they have in mind for it seems like a horrible idea to me

What other movies would be similar to GB that could/ might be beneficial to a special effects upgrade or that you see could happen in the future?

Post
#437980
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

CompMovieGuy said:

Rule 2: Any and all pictures directly inserted into the thread constitutes an unreasonable post.
(if you have a picture to share of something reasonable and pertaining to the conversation, then use a direct link URL. If the direct link URL leads to a stupid picture and/or fink-ism, a warning will be handed out and so on and so forth)

If you want to add a picture that is fine, just do it reasonably and how its described in the rules. Over the top CGI pictures of "firing the laser" are not welcome but actual illustrations (a real attempt) of what the CGI would look like would be

Post
#437968
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

My first reasonable post is the thought of other movies going back and touching up on special FXs like GL did. I was specifically thinking about Ghostbusters

Now Im not a huge GB fan but I do like the movies and I was watching today on CC and I thought to myself, man I wonder if Sony decided to go back and redo all the proton shootings and Mr Staypuft in CGI instead of blue screens. Since it looks like GB3 is coming out, who would know if something like this could happen

What would you guys think of GB went back and did something like this? Would there be fan outcry or would there be open arms with the new special FXs?

Also please mind that I am not a huge fan but I just thought of this and if they actually did touch up any special FXs already in DVD releases or made revisions/alterations, I would love for someone to point them out to me.

Post
#437967
Topic
Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
Time

Hello

Welcome to the reasonable posts thread. This thread is dedicated to all posts being reasonable. If your post is unreasonable by disregarding the rules, then you will be placed on Warning. If you persist, then you will be tagged as Unreasonable. And if you decide to go even further than that, then you will be marked as a Total Asshat. There are rules to follow to post in this thread and they are simple.

Rule 1: Be reasonable when you post.
(if its a reasonable post, then you have nothing to worry about)

Rule 2: Any and all pictures directly inserted into the thread constitutes an unreasonable post.
(if you have a picture to share of something reasonable and pertaining to the conversation, then use a direct link URL. If the direct link URL leads to a stupid picture and/or fink-ism, a warning will be handed out and so on and so forth)

Rule 3: I decide what is reasonable and what is not. If you dont like it then please, by all means, dont post in this thread.

Rule 4: I make up the rules.
(If I decide to change or alter the rules, I may do so at any time without any notice)

Warnings:

Unreasonable:

Total Asshat:

Permanent Asshat:

BingoWings
Ric Olie
TV's Fink
A B C
ChainsawAsh
Leguman

(These people above have continued to make unreasonable posts, were given plenty of opportunities to correct themselves, and decided not to, they will never be taken off this list)