logo Sign In

Commander Courage

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Aug-2004
Last activity
1-Oct-2015
Posts
724

Post History

Post
#162590
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Originally posted by: MTHaslettI don't think it can work without a "reconstructing Grievous" scene, however.

I hope someone can set me right. Commander?

When I originally thought of Grievous being Maul, such a scene did not seem necessary to me. A few hints and a brief explanation through Grievous dialogue would do fine, and I still feel that way. After all, in this version of the saga we aren't going to see the complete Anakin=Vader transformation, are we? Even so it would seem rather repetitve to see the same process twice. The last scene has potential, as Dooku and Sidious really need some more dialogue between them to explain just what the heck is going on. Christopher Lee sound clips seem to be in abundance, but what about Ian McDiarmid? Anyone have any ideas for possible sources for alternater Palpatine dialogue?
Post
#162554
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Episode I is the story of Qui Gonn.
Sounds great to me. Qui-Gon is my favorite character, so I'm all for that. Allow me to reiterate in "The Chronicles of Narnia," there is some great Neeson dialogue that is ripe for Star Wars fan edit usage. When you see the film you'll know what I mean.

Tying together the Qui-Gon focus and a possible Anakin dream, it has become obvious to me what Anakin's dream should be about. In Episode II he has a dream early in the film about his mother dying. She dies. In Episode III he has a dream early in the film about Padme dying. She dies. I'm sure you can follow my logic from here. For now this isn't too specific, so if any of you like the idea of Anakin dreaming of Qui-Gon's death and and want to run with it, feel free to do so. Idealy it would end with Padme somehow to transition into her waking him up.

Darthpreston's character of Jar-Jar seems like a reasonable way to go. The Han Solo-esque Binks of "Balance of the Force" is always an option as well. Any definite thoughts n this? We're going to have to pin him down at some point. For the record I'm all for an alien language with subtitles.

If your re-dubbing darth maul or grevious or whatever he'll be, then you could possibly add in some lines towards obi wan. I can't think of anything genius right now, but the potential is there.

Exactly. Since we're cutting all of Maul's speaking scenes anyway, and dubbing over Grievous, we're free to insert dialogue wherever we want (so long as it blends in with the scene as if it had always been there). It's unfortunate we have to lose his original voice though; can anyone do a comparable impression? Btw, I like your outline of Qui-Gon's death scene, but I don't see why we need another shot of him stabbing at the forcefield with his lightsaber.
Post
#162514
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
That was my "idea," but again it was more of a fun experiment then an actual suggestion. I admit it is an intriguing propsoal, but regardless of whatever role Dooku would play in Episode I, wouldn't it undermine all the reasons for removing Sidious except for the rather obvious Sidious=Palpatine connection. So although Dooku in Episode I via an obscured Sidious hologram and LotR dialogue was in fact my idea, but as for fitting it into the story, I really have no plan to speak of. I would encourage my esteemed colleagues to try and devise one though if the concept is of interest to them.

Now, in one of the few mentions of ESB in the thread, I once again turn your attention to sepharih of the Jedi Council Discussion Boards. I thought it would be best to explain the folllowing clip in the words of the editor himself:

First I would like to give Neo_MP5 credit for his help in this. A week or so ago he gave me a couple of clips to showcase his adding of Duel of the Fates to Luke and Vader's duel on Bespin in ESB. The clip i'm about to show you is from the very last part of the duel during the "big Reveal" scene.
One of the best things Neo_MP5 did in his edit, which I hope he will showcase here when he's finished with it, is that he didn't just layer Duel of the fates over the entire fight, but instead restricted it to a very subtle motif that would occasionally play during key moments, whilst restricted the majority of the added music to a darker more ominous track.
During the last part of the fight, however, duel of the fates spins out in all it's glory and the effect is very impresive.
The begining of my clip is structured exactly like his is, and it only variats after vader knocks luke down on the catwalk. I was personally slightly dissatisfied with how the music was cut after that point and so I decided to do my own variant of it. I PM'd Neo_Mp5 with my version a day or so ago but I haven't heard back from him yet, So I decided to just go ahead and post it here.
Also, it changes one more thing. Originally when Vader revealed his identity to luke it was, of course, designed to be a huge twist. It was as much a revelation for Luke as it was for the audience, but now when watching them 1-6, everyone knows that it's coming.
So I started thinking about it, and I eventually decided to see what it would look like if the twist factor was removed completely, giving it a track that was remniscent of Anakin as well as building up to what was about to happen. Now, I have added instead a track from Episode 3, and the scene now is no longer designed huge shocker, but rather an emotionally climactic moment between Luke and Vader. I'm not sure what the reaction too it will be, but I know that this is going on my personal cut of the trilogy.

The clip: http://rapidshare.de/files/8835399/ESBREVEAL.mov.html

I think there is some definite potential in a musical alteration along these lines, particularly in the "I am your father" portion. Of course I had that music in mind for Obi-Wan's death, but I'm sure we can come to a reasonable compromise through discussion. Duel of the Fates matches up surprisingly well too, but I doubt many here will be fans of that change.
Post
#162489
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
But someone made a VERY good point; the confrontation between Obi-Wan and Grievous is not at all appropriate for Obi-Wan facing the man that killed his master. He makes cocky, "funny" comments, like "hello there", "you're move", and "So uncivilized." Remember how furious he was in Episode I? I loved that, and we didn't get that rage or emotion in Episode III. Instead we got Obi-Wan riding around on a lizard and Grievous riding around in whatever that weird vehicle was. I don't know how to address this for my Ep. III.

On the surface I admit this seems like a problem. But with the proper edting I think all of this can be properly rectified. I can see why you'd point out Obi-Wan sarcastic attitude as being an inconsistency, but I don't think so. Remember, at this point he doesn't know Grievous is the Sith from Episode I. Through dialogue that can be revealed, at which point Obi-Wan get's really angry: There is one particular shot of him gritting his teeth in a saber lock with Grievous. If it's possible to extend the actual lightsaber portion of the confrontation utilizing the fullscreen DVD for alterate framings of shots and even reversing and repeating some shots, I think that's a must. The extreme close ups of their eyes would be the ideal place for the identity reveal, cutting one of the two Obi-Wan "I can't be"s from the security recording scene and reinserting it here. Then the "angry" shot, force push, Grievous makes a run for it, with Obi-Wan in hot pursuit. I can do with or without the "So uncivilized" line, with possibly another line from Obi-Wan as he looks down on Grievous' smoldering body. So those are my rough ideas on how to address this issue.
Post
#162338
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Originally posted by: THX
Originally posted by: MTHaslett
We'd see Amidala escape from Naboo, see no response from the Trade Federation, but suddenly see a guy in black arrive on Tatooine and send out droids. The droids find Qui Gonn -- they fight, Qui Gonn escapes -- and... what just happened?

Precisely! So the movie is one step ahead of the audience, rather than the other way around. Then we see Maul report back to the Neimoidians, before going to Naboo, and it all starts to make sense.

Hmmm, I can see both side here and aren't sure which one to take. Having the Tatooine arrival scene first makes for a very strong enterance for Grievous, akin to Vader's on the Tantive. But plot wise it would make sense for Nute to dispatch him to retrieve the Queen. I just don't know for now.

Another thought I had to spin things in a completely different direction: Is Anakin going to have a dream in Episode I? Putting together various pieces I constructed this scenario in my head:
-Activating the Podracer scene
-Misc. Trade Federation scene/perhaps contacting Grievous
-Grievous arriving on Tatooin scene
-CUT TO BLACK at conclusion (Even though it was just because of the test nature of the clip, I loved it)
-Anakin has a vision/dream
-Fade into Padme waking up Anakin.

This works on several levels. It cuts the now unecessary Qui-Gon/Anakin blood test scene, and has you assume he spent the night outside finishing up his pod. Anakin has a dream in the novelization in that exact spot as well, so taking a cue from that we could put together something similar to Trooperman's in SotDS. Some Padme material in the dream would make it an easy transition to her waking him up. I think the idea we were having in the SotDS thread was that Palpatine was in fact causing Anakin's dreams, so this may or may not work for a variety of reasons, but it's worth some discussion regardless.
Post
#162304
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Barring a possible post-credit sequence, I don't think there is any real way to show the process Maul went through to become the cyborg Grievous of Episode III. The way I envisioned it was Grievous monologing to Obi-Wan at the start of their duel in III, explaining what all he had to go through because of him. Maybe a, "I had to stay in suspended animation for a decade before the technology was available to make me what I am now. This is not an existance worthy of a Sith, Kenobi. And it's all because of you." Something similar to Maul's monologue to Obi-Wan in the Star Wars Infinities story where he confronts him on Tatooine.

And we need to establish (or establish how we're going to establish) Grievous' objectives in Episode I. He is on Tatooine in search of Amidala for the Trade Federation. Perhaps he does notice Anakin as he flees to the ship an mentions this to Qui-Gon (I suggested some rough dialogue in an earlier post). After failing to capture the Queen, he goes to Naboo with the Trade Federation, waiting for the Queen and the Jedi to return? This is what makes it so hard without Sidious. It would indeed be cool to have Grievous after the vergence in the force, Anakin, but I just don't see how to convey that or even go anywhere with it with the material we have available to us.

PS. I saw "Chronicles of Narnia" tonight; great film I highly recommend it. That said, it was an unexpected pleasure when Aslan, the Lion character, was introduced in the film and began to speak: it was Liam Neeson! He's one of my favorite actors so this really enhanced the movie for me, but more importantly he had some great dialogue that would be very useful for Qui-Gon! I look forward to discussing this more in depth as more of you see the film (which I hope you will!).

Another mind-blowing suggestion by Commander Courage that I never would have thought of. Excellent idea, My Friend. I'd love to try this, just to see if it could work.

Wow, thanks Infodroid. Like I said I just thought it would be a neat experiment, but if there's a way to incorporate it into the film somewhere that would certainly shake things up.
Post
#162187
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
I was actually going to suggest using another Sidious hologram scene in just substituting Maul in the close up. Good call. The Nute/Rune (actually that's not Rune, that's the "slime" guy) exchange doesn't quite work in front of Grievous though. Maybe MTH or someone else can come up with some new dialogue (you're right about the body language, btw). Grievous dialogue in the long shot works great too, working out much better than coming from offscreen, which would really expose the cut-and-paste nature of the scene. Overall good job. I would suggest slowing down the footage of Grievous' close-up though, as he shifts too much in the limited clips we have. Drawing them out more would correct this problem.

Here's a crazy thought: Since the Maul/Sidious swap worked so well and everyone's big on Dooku being in Episode I, what do you think of some Saruman dialogue in the Sidious shots, with the close-ups of the hood darkened like in MagnoliaFan's version? Just a fun experiment to mess around with. It's too bad we don't have any shots of a Grievous hologram though; that would be a good way to incorporate him in Episode II.
Post
#162150
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
First, it goes against the whole concept of two Sith - a master and an apprentice, unless the plan is to cut out the reference to the rule of two at the end of Episode I. I mean, even if we assume that it takes a while for Sidious to restore Maul/Grievous, there's still a time at the beginning of Episode III where there are two apprentices.
Here at the Ranch, we don't see this as a problem. Maul/Grievous was trained by Sidious from birth (or close enough). It makes sense for him to at least try to retrieve him, as he later retrieves Anakin. Dooku is a temporary fix, and a political figure who serves Sidious' purposes well in the Clone War. Sidious really needs them both to accomplish his goals; there's no reason to limit himself to one just because of an old tradition (that will not be present in out saga, btw). Also he's quite an arrogant one, and assume he can control both apprentices, which of course it does. Different times call for different measures. As Chancellor of the Republic, it would not be in Dooku or Grievous' best interests to assassinate him if the SIth were to retake control of the galaxy. I'm sure each of them had their own aspirations for takeover, but that would have to wait until the Sith were secure in their power.

Second, Maul/Grievous is a sith yet never uses a red lightsaber in Episode III. This could be fixed by rotoscoping though. I know he's collecting Jedi sabers, but at least one of his sabers should be a red sith saber. Ideally, it would be the repaired half of his original saber from Episode I.

Yes, the plan is to recolor his lightsabers. I would suggest all four and vut Grievous' saber-collecting, because as I've noted before, he doesn't seem to concerned with keeping Qui-Gon's or Obi-Wan's in Episode I. Rotoscoping all four would be quite an undertaking, but well worth the effort. This is where the teamwork aspect of the Ranch really comes into play.

What I'm getting at is, Sidious uses his Sith magic/technology to bring back Maul/Grievous from death and put him in a mechanical suit. If we have Vader die in Episode III, the Emperor ends up doing the exact same thing with him.

Exactly. I read your earlier post on this and couldn't agree more. I always interpreted, "You don't know the power of the Dark Side. I MUST obey my master," as Palpatine and the Dark Side keeping him alive. His selfishness to keep on living would not allow him to "let go of his hate." It's only when he puts his son's life above his own that he gives up the Dark Side, no longer concerned with self preservation.

Glad you liked my suggested Yoda dialogue. Great idea about a fan impersonater. It doesn't have to be perfect, pitch and the like can always be altered via computer, and it's certainly worth a try.
Post
#162107
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Originally posted by: THX But here's another idea: put this scene after the Tatooine scenes, rather than before. The reason I suggest this is that it gives Maul a better introduction in the movie if he just shows up and we don't know who he is or what he's doing, then later we see him report to the Trade Federation. Kinda like Vader and Tarkin.

Yes, even better parallels to Vader on the Tantive IV. But what would the conversation be about then, and how would we know Maul was searching for Amidala? Maybe an earlier bit of dialoue between Nute and Rune.
Rune: She's escaped! We'll never find her now...
Nute: Always the pessimest, Hako. Lord Grievous will intercept her majesty and deal with her accordingly.

Dooku’s discussion with Obi-Wan is confusing whichever way you look at it. It can only be assumed he is saying whatever he thinks will persuade Obi-Wan to join him. Even then why reveal Sidious? Whatever, it’s a great scene and one of my favorites in Episode II (helped tremendously by Lee and McGregor being excellent actors).

As for reconstructing Grievous, if there’s a way to see SOMETHING, no matter how vague or obscured, it would go a long way. Unless we can find an appropriate place for it in the films, which I doubt, an easter egg similar to ADM’s after the end credits of ANH would be in order. But then the question becomes which film, I or II? Would it really take ten years to complete Grievous? No, therefore I would be the logical choice. If we could work his presence into II somehow, even the tiniest bit, that would help as well. What footage could we use, you ask? Well, if the “Construction of Vader” clips with screaming Anakin were indeed going to be cut, or even if they weren’t those shots could be altered to suit are purposes. Then take of the RotS Trailer with ending dialogue.
Sidious: Lord Grievous?
Grivous: Yes, master.
Sidious: Rise.
The briefest shot of Grievous opening his eyes in the darkness.

Dooku in TPM? First of all its almost logistically impossible, and then we’ve got, “It’s a pity our paths have never crossed before, Obi-Wan.” It would feel too shoehorned in and out of place.
Post
#161999
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Ok, here's a rough outline of the Grievous Hologram Scene:

EXTERIOR SHOT - TRADE FEDERATION BATTLESHIP

RUNE: I still don't like this. Getting so closely involved with the Sith---
NUTE: What's not to like? We're both after the same thing: power. You best remember who holds the power here, Hako.
RUNE: But we know almost nothing about them. If it's discovered that we're working with---
Sound effect of hologram activating.
GRIEVOUS: (O.S.) You are in need of my services, Viceroy?
NUTE: Lord Grievous. Lord Sidious has told us of your efficient reputation.
Grievous simply stares at the Nemoidians.
NUTE: Ah, well, a Naboo royal crusier has gotten past our blockade. We are certain Queen Amidala was onboard. The ship was damaged during the escape, and according to our projections will be unable to make it to Coruscant in its current condition. You are to see to it the Queen is intercepted and returned to Naboo.
Again, Grievous says nothing. This makes Nute and Rune uneasy.
NUTE: Is there anything---
Greivous cuts him off, O.S.
GREIVOUS: That will be all Viceroy.
Sound effect of hologram deactivating.
RUNE: Quiet one, isn't he?
Post
#161977
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Well it all depends on the dialogue, but I would have the Nemoidians discussing brining in Grievous before his hologram appears. And it would be great to SEE the hologram flicker in. Is there a way to accomplish this? So Nute's assistant (Rune, I think) has his reservations about working so closely with a Sith, but Nute isn't concerned. Then Grievous appears and cuts off theit conversation.

Now this is going to be totally off-the-wall, but is there a way to get his lips to move so we could dub in some lines? Grievous responding to them is essential for the conversation to work. The last shot of this scene would be an intimidating line from Greivous. So can this be acheived without the Conan O'Brien feel to it?
Post
#161973
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Impressive! Most Impressive!

The Nemoidians continue so sound awesome, and while I'd suggest editing the hologram scene a little differently, the Tatooine arrival scene is PERFECT. Using Grievous' Theme there is amazing, and fit the visuals remarkably well. In the original version it was like, "Oh look, there's Darth Maul. And he's sending probe droid. He'll probably fin them pretty soon now. Okay, next scene," but in this version it's lile, "$hit! Qui-Gon and the gang are in trouble! They better hurry up and get out of there before Grievous finds them!" This is Grievous' big reveal, just as Vader's was on the Tantive IV, powerful music is in order.

Speaking of, there has been much talk of inserting the Imperial March into ANH. Once again I present a clip from a Jedi Council Discussion Board Member at TF.N:
http://rapidshare.de/files/8850916/Vaderimpmarch.mov.html

Having the old music transition into the new was a great touch. I would however reinstate Vader's silent assesment of the situation, where we just hear his breathing, and find another clip of the Imperial March to plug in as he and the troops leave the shot. (I hope that made sense.)
Post
#161936
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Here are some important exerpts from the discussion about Qui-Gon in Trooperman's thread:

Commander Courage:
In your break-down of the offical scenario, there is no doubt Lucas left himself some plotholes. What else is new? I've read that in early screening of TPM, Qui-Gon's body did indeed dissapear in the fire. This would be something to consider, but then what about everyone watching? Surely now that it's been established Jedi DON'T dissapear, there would be some sort of reaction if Jinn did. Anakin SHOULD have dissapeared, it even says he did in the Star Wars Databank, but Lucas' offical explanation (at least in The Annotated Screenplays) is that Obi-Wan and Yoda caught him on the other side. Of course he also said the "real" reason was that we wanted all the heroes of the PT to be together again, which is why I'm all for adding Qui-Gon (and maybe even Padme) to RotJ. But that discussion is for another time. But Anakin dissapearing is definitely something I would change; he's the Chosen One, that's explanation enough.

And while I do indeed support expanding Qui-Gon's role, it would be in a different way that Obi-Wan's life after death, as MTHaslett already pointed out. The problem with what I think you were getting at, TM, was that there can be no conversaions between Qui-Gon and the characters. This puts him in a very similar position as Obi-Wan in ANH after his death. He communicates with Luke in extreme moments, but they aren't chatting it up and we don't have Luke questioning how he's talking to him. In fact, Luke seems to not believe it himself at first. Here are some places I think dialogue from Qui-Gon would be approriate and meaningful:
-At some point during the space battle, when Anakin fires the torpedoes into the reactor for example, have Qui-Gon in his head: "Concentrate on the moment. Feel, don't think. Use your instincts." Qui-Gon is straddling life and death here, so this could be interpreted as either a rememberance (he told Anakin this before the pod race), Force user-to-Force user communication (Luke and Vader at the end of ESB), or advice from the netherworld (Obi-Wan in ANH).
-When Obi-Wan is hanging in the pit, have Qui-Gon is his head: "Always be mindful of your surroundings." Then he remembers Jinn's lightsaber is still there and leaps up to kill Maul. That could be interpreted as the latter two options from above.
-I thought about having Qui-Gon die after "Promise me you will train the boy," (assumming you would keep that line), then have "He will bring balance. Train him," echo in the long shot, in Obi-Wan's head I assume. But that might be a little weird.
-I mentioned this before, but perhaps have some of Qui-Gon's tone poem in Anakin's head at the funeral. "It will be a hard life. One without reward, without remorse, without regret." This would tie-in with the dream in your Episode 2, but again it might be a bit out of place.
-Qui-Gon dissapearing in the fire? Again, logically there would be some kind of reaction/response, so I'd say leave this as-is.
-Qui-Gon starts off the dream in SotDS.
-You know thinking about it, maybe we could weave a sub-plot here of Qui-Gon being responsible for Anakin's nightmares, trying to warn him about the future. He always starts off Anakin's dreams, and in RotS they could be continual visions with not only Padme, but maybe a glimpse of Vader and his future evil? Just a thought; not sure if/how that would work.
-Some kind of dialogue alteration after the Tusken massacare. Replacing the "NO!" first and foremost. Getting two different "Anakin"s would be nice too, making it seem less like a cut and paste job. Any additional stuff you can think of.
-So Qui-Gon in Anakin's Episode 3 visions is a possibility.
-A prefect line that could go several places (from Batman Begins): "Your anger gives you great power but [if you let it] it will destroy you." The place I have in mind of it is when Anakin looks into the suns on Mustafar, before he sheds a tear.
-Reconstructing the Yoda scene in some way. What I think everyone is forgetting is that they still need the Yoda part, which will never be released. And since it all has to be pieced together from different sources anyway, alter and expand it to not only explain the secret of immortality, but Qui-Gon expresses some responsibility for what happened in regards to Anakin.
-After Obi-Wan says "Qui-Gon!", maybe a line or two from Jinn would be appropriate. No "Teach you how to commune with him, I will," rather something from Qui-Gon along the lines of, "Yes Obi-Wan. I will guide you..."
-Considering this last scene, Obi-Wan should not hear from Qui-Gon after he has officially died. This leaves my first two suggestions possible, and reserves surprise for Obi-Wan in RotS. That works very well considering there's not many quiet moments for him to hear Qui-Gon in the first place.

Trooperman:
“Qui-Gon dissapearing in the fire? Again, logically there would be some kind of reaction/response, so I'd say leave this as-is.”
“in early screening of TPM, Qui-Gon's body did indeed dissapear in the fire. This would be something to consider, but then what about everyone watching? Surely now that it's been established Jedi DON'T dissapear, there would be some sort of reaction if Jinn did.”

This is a good idea, though- Qui-Gon could disappear in the fire like Anakin was supposed to in ROTJ. This didn’t occur to me. About the reaction? I could probably find a way around this, like…camera pans over to Palpatine, who is staring ahead at something (longer than he was in the original). The scene ends with a shot of the fire, only…Qui-Gon has completely disappeared. CUT to celebration.

This does many things. We don’t have to deal with the reaction of the crowd, because the scene ends with the disappearance. We know that Palpatine saw what had happened and is disturbed by it (as well as the loss of his apprentice). And best of all, we know Qui-Gon actually disappears in the fire and becomes one with the force. I just don’t like the idea that Qui-Gon died, and somehow after he was dead he managed to find out how to come back as a ghost in his original form. I like the idea that during his life, he worked towards discovering this secret so that when he died, he was able to fade away. It was a result of his brilliance and hard work in life.

“Anakin SHOULD have dissapeared”

Yes, but if I’m not mistaken, I believe his physical face was visible during the burning scene. I would have to check on that.

“The problem with what I think you were getting at, TM, was that there can be no conversaions between Qui-Gon and the characters.”

Right. It can’t be like Empire; it has to be like SW when Obi-Wan spoke up at emotional high points.

“At some point during the space battle, when Anakin fires the torpedoes into the reactor for example, have Qui-Gon in his head: "Concentrate on the moment. Feel, don't think. Use your instincts." Qui-Gon is straddling life and death here, so this could be interpreted as either a rememberance (he told Anakin this before the pod race), Force user-to-Force user communication (Luke and Vader at the end of ESB), or advice from the netherworld (Obi-Wan in ANH).”

Yes- I LOVE this idea. Anakin goes from not having a clue what he’s doing the whole time to not having a clue until he hears Qui-Gon. Then, he has control. Great parallel to SW, also.

“When Obi-Wan is hanging in the pit, have Qui-Gon is his head: "Always be mindful of your surroundings." Then he remembers Jinn's lightsaber is still there and leaps up to kill Maul. That could be interpreted as the latter two options from above.”

Good idea to have some Qui-Gon dialogue there- however, when I get to Ep. I, I’ll probably think about using some other dialogue there that works better dramatically. You never know…

“I thought about having Qui-Gon die after "Promise me you will train the boy," (assumming you would keep that line), then have "He will bring balance. Train him," echo in the long shot, in Obi-Wan's head I assume. But that might be a little weird.”

That would probably come off as weird style-wise. However, I like the idea of him dying after saying “Promise me you will train the boy.” I could possibly manipulate dialogue to make him say, “The boy will bring balance. Promise me you will train him.” Anyway, plenty of time to think about that.

“I mentioned this before, but perhaps have some of Qui-Gon's tone poem in Anakin's head at the funeral. "It will be a hard life. One without reward, without remorse, without regret." This would tie-in with the dream in your Episode 2, but again it might be a bit out of place.”

Maybe, but less so than the previous example. This could work, but I’d have to test it multiple ways.

“You know thinking about it, maybe we could weave a sub-plot here of Qui-Gon being responsible for Anakin's nightmares, trying to warn him about the future. He always starts off Anakin's dreams, and in RotS they could be continual visions with not only Padme, but maybe a glimpse of Vader and his future evil? Just a thought; not sure if/how that would work.”

Ha ha- I know how it would work. After I read that, I realized how this would work. And it’s going to be so spectacularly creepy that I don’t even want to give it away yet. I will say that this will work VERY well and will make the story that much richer. Also, think “Vertigo” again (although that probably won’t help.) Anyway, thank you for some MAJOR inspiration.

“Some kind of dialogue alteration after the Tusken massacare. Replacing the "NO!" first and foremost. Getting two different "Anakin"s would be nice too, making it seem less like a cut and paste job. Any additional stuff you can think of.’

Yeah, I’m not sure about that yet, but something is guaranteed to be different about this.

“A prefect line that could go several places (from Batman Begins): "Your anger gives you great power but [if you let it] it will destroy you." The place I have in mind of it is when Anakin looks into the suns on Mustafar, before he sheds a tear.”

Very good idea. I can definitely use that line at some point. Also, thinking ahead to that scene, as much as everyone praises the music for that scene as being the highest emotional point for them, etc. etc- I really don’t like it, believe it or not. It was interesting the first time because it was a novel and completely different approach, but I would like to rescore this with something more sad/beautiful in romantic style. This will likely be an unpopular change- oh, well.

“Reconstructing the Yoda scene in some way. What I think everyone is forgetting is that they still need the Yoda part, which will never be released. And since it all has to be pieced together from different sources anyway, alter and expand it to not only explain the secret of immortality, but Qui-Gon expresses some responsibility for what happened in regards to Anakin.”

I’m probably not going to be able to do this myself. If MagnoliaFan or AdigitalMan want to take a stab at it, then perhaps I can use the scene if it works out in their versions. But I don’t know how to go about replacing both Yoda and Qui-gon dialogue.

“After Obi-Wan says "Qui-Gon!", maybe a line or two from Jinn would be appropriate. No "Teach you how to commune with him, I will," rather something from Qui-Gon along the lines of, "Yes Obi-Wan. I will guide you..."

This is more likely what I’ll do with this. Maybe I could even put some kind of non-talking on-screen Qui-Gon ghost image by Yoda. I do agree that actually seeing Qui-Gon after he dies in Ep. I would really drive the point home, and things would make much more sense.

Hi there! If I were to put an image of Qui-Gon in the Mustafar scene, he would not talk. He would shimmer in the background maybe, but he would not talk to Anakin. More likely than actually putting his ghost there would be to have Anakin cry out for Qui-Gon’s help as he burns. Qui-Gon doesn’t answer as Anakin screams in pain and calls for Qui-Gon. I can do this due to the dubbing. This would bring up a bunch of interesting Biblical parallels that I don’t want to discuss now Good idea, though. Oh, and by the way- I HATE midichlorians with a passion and they will not be included in my saga.

MtHaslett- I Understand where you’re coming from, too. It’s not that the simple interpration is incorrect, it’s just that it’s a stretch and it doesn’t seem to be enough. What has actually gone on with the force ghosts is not explained well at all through the six movies, and elaborating on it serves many purposes. It makes for an overall richer story and also works very well dramatically (Qui-Gon communicating with Anakin and Obi-Wan in Ep. I, Qui-Gon somehow trying to interfere with Palpatine’s dreams and adding his own messages to them.

“What advice from Qui Gon would make Ep II better?”
“If you add Qui-Gon throughout Ep I, II, and III as a voice offering advice and such, you'll be creating more questions than you answer for me.”

Right- but the only time Qui-Gon shows up in Episode II is 1. At the beginning of the dream, and 2. After the Tusken slaughter. In Episode I, he is not dead until the end. Therefore, anything that he says could be interpreted as memories or as direct communication using the force. And in III, his words echo through Anakin’s head, much like Palpatine’s did at the beginning. And then of course we have the ending. So this isn’t creating any questions for me- throughout the PT, Qui-Gon voice keeps coming back. He isn’t watching everything and commenting on everything, saying “Don’t kiss that girl!” “Palpatine is a Sith lord!” etc. You remember that in the original trilogy, Obi-Wan was allowed to do some things and not others (like giving Luke advice when he fought Vader and the Emperor). Even Yoda was restricted in this way.

MTH:
While I can't say I follow the reasoning that because the Force ghosts aren't spelled out that the movies are less rich or that explaining where they come from (or, in the case of having Qui Gon disappear in the fire) making them common place does anything to enrich things -- I can't say the changes you suggest really bother me. I don't see leaving things as they are as any sort of stretch. These movies have a religion -- THE FORCE. Many movies have regligion in them, and the good ones don't spend a lot of time explaining away the mysteries that make their particular religion work. It would be one thing if we didn't understand how Luke could possibly fire a torpedo into the ventilation shaft, but if we need to explain how Obi Wan disappeared, we might as well have an explanation for how Luke had a sword fight with Darth Vader on Degobah. Just my opinion.

Commander Courage:
I really don't know about Qui-Gon disspearing in the fire. My reasoning is the same as yours, "I just don’t like the idea that Qui-Gon died, and somehow after he was dead he managed to find out how to come back as a ghost in his original form. I like the idea that during his life, he worked towards discovering this secret so that when he died, he was able to fade away." But something as significant as that would surely be worth a mention, which of course would be absent. All that aside, if you're going to go for it, showing Qui-Gon dissapear on-screen is the way to do it. If not, it's TOO ambiguous. So in the final shot of Qui-Gon burning, he would fade away, then Yoda and Mace discuss the Sith, omninous shot of Palpatine, cut to end celebration. Of course, we have plenty of time to work this out. Btw, all you can see in RotJ is Vader's burning armor, no physical Anakin.


Sluggo:
1. The body of Qui-Gon can not dissappear. As it has been mentioned, this would create more problems than it would fix. In addition, Yoda and Obi-wan pretty much evaporated soon as they were dead. If this is the norm, then he would have to dissappear in Obi-wan's arms in the reactor room. Otherwise, he'd still be alive when they put him on the pyre and would have died in the flames.

2. I've been trying to talk somebody into re-editing the Anakin destroying the Droid Control Ship for quite a while. Having Qui-gon speak to Anakin through the Force is the way the movie needed to end up. The allusion to Luke destroying the Death Star would be perfect. The only problem would be that in the final edit, Qui-Gon is still alive. He dies after Anakin destroys the ship. Having Qui-Gon 'communicate' with Anakin while he is still alive seems problematic. Moving the scenes around fix the problem. Incidentally, the revised 3rd draft has Qui-Gon dying before Anakin does his stuff.

3. As far as having Gui-gon communicate with Anakin or Obi-wan later in the movies....I think I'd leave the communication to a minimum. Qui-gon is a prequel character. If he is talking to everybody and appearing to everybody, then there's no reason for him not to be in the classic trilogy. If I had him appear, I'd have him only at the very end of the movie, As Obi-wan is walking back to the Eeopie. He'd appeas as Obi-wan walks towards him.


Trooperman:
1. I see what you're saying, but...could someone explain to me again what happened with Darth at the end of ROTJ? We're going on the original Sebastian Shaw scenario, by the way.

2. Absolutely- this has been brought up before and you don't need to convince me a bit. When I FINALLY get to Episode I in a couple years, then this is sure to happen.

3. I'm not sure about cutting the communication, because I do think Qui-Gon is an important character and needs to be somewhat more involved, if he has retained his identity. But that's a VERY interesting idea, showing the ghost of Qui-Gon at the end of the film, almost like the end of ROTJ. That would tie things up very, very nicely. So what we would have in my PT is: Qui-Gon dies. Then, he helps Anakin destroy the Control Ship (like Obi-Wan in original SW). Qui-Gon doesn't have any contact with Obi-Wan (until the very end, when Obi-Wan sees his master at the end of the film), but Qui-Gon continues to be in touch with Anakin, through dreams and whatnot. This would make sense because he did this immediately after dying in Ep. I. Then, Yoda does NOT make the casual comment about communing with Qui-Gon. Qui-Gon simply appears to Obi-Wan at the end, kind of de-emphasizing the "learning" part of becoming a ghost and still retaining some mystery. What do you guys think? I'm very happy with this particular solution.


TheDemonHunter:
I'd have to agree with all of you here, if we're all on the same page with this. I really believe the PT did too much to take away the mystery of the Force by giving too many explanations (ie. midichlorians... *shudders, trying not to wretch*) and leaving it as you've described here would fit the mythos far better, IMHO. Using Qui-Gon in this way is sort of like giving another parallel to the OT, as Qui-Gon dies before giving Anakin his complete training and then he is trained by another, just as Luke loses Obi-Wan before much training can be done, only to have his training passed off to another (Yoda in this case). The continued edits would really would drive home not only the similarities of the two generations of Skywalkers, but also the differences, as we see Luke resist the Emperor where Anakin couldn't. They seem so much on the same path in ANH/TPM and ESB/AOTC, only to find their ultimate failings or victories in ROTJ/ROTS. Giving Anakin the same guidance as Luke had will surely underline the fact that they can and should have been done as two sides of the same coin instead of the vastly different characters shown in the OT and PT. Shame on Lucas for not seeing this the way we do. lol


Commander Courage:
Personally I was talking about both! There are parallels with both scenarios, but in particular Luke and Anakin's position as they lay dying in extreme cold and heat respectively. If Qui-Gon's spirit were to appear it would then mirror Hoth much more than Cloud City.

Post
#161876
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Originally posted by: THX
I agree with Hardcore Legend and MTH: there's no logical inconsistency with both Qui-Gon and Anakin not disappearing, yet becoming force ghosts. (What is mesa sayin'? This sounds more like a Bizzle comment than a THX one).

But I do feel that Qui-Gon, sensing he might fail, prepared for the other side in advance, while Maul was held back by the red force-field. It wasn't explicit and could be interpreted in many ways but it was reminiscent of Ben's calm before he disappeared in ANH.

To be honest the whole Qui-Gon discovers the secret of immortality sub-plot isn't too hot. It would be better just to cut it than run rings trying to explain it. (Aah, that's more like it, THX).

I agree. Did you catch that, InfoDroid? I AGREE.

We are indeed removing the entire aspect of Qui-Gon discovering the path to immortality. However, one of the more interesting aspects of this (which was unfortunately deleted from the final film) was the fact that the Sith were after immortality, but would never achieve it through their selfish means. In contrast, the Jedi obtain it through their selflessness. This is a powerful plot point that I wish we could bring back to the forefront, but the way things are looking in our saga it’s looking like it will be just as ignored as in the official version. It doesn’t necessarily have to be through Qui-Gon, but things are obviously set up that way.
Post
#161862
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Trooperman and I discussed this very thing in the Shroud of the Dark Side thread. We’re both for Anakin disappearing in the last shot of Luke w/his body on the Death Star. I don’t know how to do this either (“wishful thinking,” haha), but I’m sure someone here does. As for Qui-Gon, I originally wanted it to stay as is, making the same point you did: there would be some kind of reaction from the onlookers if Jinn were to disappear. But TM noted there should be SOMETHING different about Qui-Gon’s death to explain why he was able to come back from the netherworld and other Jedi were not.

The key to this is Qui-Gon’s explanation of the path to immortality. Are we indeed going with no “explanation,” just to have him stay in contact with Anakin through dreams and intense circumstances, and then appear to Obi-Wan as he walks off into the desert? Subtleness has its advantages, but that might be so subtle to the point of confusing.
Post
#161836
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
I was thinking of adding, "You have failed, master" or something like that. If only he had said "It is finished" at one point
Again, the James Earl Jones Audio Bible would be a great resource...

Anyway you can stretch that scene so the viewer has time to comprehend that its indeed Qui-Gon?

Well Qui-Gon's a very distinctive figure, and who else would it be? Also, his spirit will appear at the end of III, as Obi-Wan walks back into the desert (at least that is the tentatove plan).
Post
#161734
Topic
Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side (the TM edit) (Released)
Time
Trooperman, you will do exactly as MTH has instructed. And InfoDroid, you will learn your place young one.



As I'm sure we all realize, it's our combined effort and different viewpoints that make for the superior product we're endeavoring to put out. We're like Lucasfilm pre-RotJ. I thought about breaking it down, but I only got as far as Trooperman as Lucas and myself as Gary Kurtz. I suppose MTH could be Ben Burtt (1980s). Or maybe Trooperman is John Williams, MTH is Lucas, InfoDroid is Kasdan? Or maybe...yeah I don't know, but there are definite possibilities here...
Post
#161732
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
I don't think people are completely understanding my version of events. Luke sees Obi-Wan, Yoda, and Anakin's ghosts. The the three old ghosts morph into their younger selves. Then Luke leaves with Leia to join the celebration. Then Qui-Gon appears besides the young Obi-Wan, Yoda, and Anakin. (Notice that Luke does not see Qui-Gon, because as everyone is so quick to point out, he would no know who he is.) Then we see the original final shot of the OT characters with the Ewoks. Then a NEW final shot with the four ghosts: Anakin, the main character of the saga, his mentor and brother in arms Obi-Wan, his father figure (as well as Obi-Wan's mentor) Qui-Gon, who first discovered the path to immortality, and Yoda, ultimate Jedi Master and mentor to them all. This isn't for Luke, it's for Anakin (the main character of the saga), and the audience.

As for Qui-Gon, the plan was to have him dissapear in the flames. There is an in-depth discussion about Qui-Gon and his role in the prequels/saga in the Shroud of the Dark Side thread.
Post
#161608
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
Originally posted by: InfoDroid
This will never, ever happen as long as I'm involved. LOL! I don't like the idea of ANY other Force spirits than the ones we already have. It can get you in all kinds of trouble. Once you start with say, Qui-Gon, then why not Ki-Adi-Mundi? He was murdered. Along with all the other Jedi. And why stop with Jedi? What about Biggs? Red Leader? Porkins and the whole Rogue Squadron? And why not Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru? They were all murdered too! And while you're at it, just throw Whoopi Goldberg and Patrick Swayze in there as well. "What you talkin' bout Sam Wheat..."
I was waiting for someone make this argument. As I explained above, Qui-Gon is the one who discovered the secret to immortality. He is the one who taught Obi-Wan and Yoda, and Anakin becoming one with the Force can have a variety of explanations. This is not arguing he was an important character in the saga, so it'd be nice to have him there. This is arguing he is the reason the others ARE there, sharing the path with them; Qui-Gon deserves to be there, and it is logical for him to be so.

Originally posted by: InfoDroid
I know someone suggested in another thread about it not having any subtitle, just "Star Wars Episode I". I'm not sure how I feel about that, though I'm not completely opposed to the idea. I'm starting to get excited about this.

STARTING? I've been excited about this for weeks!

About the title though, Trooperman himself has suggested going with simply "Star Wars" for the title of this episode. While that's certainly a new take on things, I would argue that Star Wars is the name of the saga, and each chapter should have its own unique title. For example, the first LotR film is not "Lord of the Rings," rather "Lord of the Rings: The Felloiwship of the Ring." That's just an observation though; I'm not sure how I feel about it either.

Maul is a tricky subject. Is he a lone Sith assassin? Is he working with the Trade Federation? If he is in league with the Nemoidians, does he have his own agenda? The most important question however is what can we do with the material we have to work with? Reinventing the character of Maul/Grievous is a key alteration to this saga; that's one of the things that we should probably map out before we start delving into the saga.
Post
#161540
Topic
The legendary "Starkiller Ranch" Thread
Time
So I better paste together all those Episode I notes. I like the idea that Maul has a second agenda while working with the Nemoidians -- but he is there to assist them as well. It is at the request of Sidious that he stays at the Nemoidian's side. If he senses the Vergence of the Force, it will be a coincidence for him just as it is for Qui Gon. But a beat of Maul recognizing the Force in Anakin as he fights Qui Gon at the Queen's ship would be something I'd like to see -- just a beat where Maul gives Anakin a second glance of "Hey, that kid's special. Note to self: keep an eye on this one." Especially if there were a way to make Anakin see Maul and be terrified by him there.
This is a good idea, and I wished they would have done SOMETHING along these line in the actual film. Maul just ignores Anakin, which shouldn't be the case at all. Now allow me to make a suggestion: All of Maul's speaking scenes are being cut in this edit. Therefore, as cool as his voice is, there's no need to stay consistent as we never hear that voice in this saga. In III, Grievous will have to be dubbed. In conclusion, why doesn't the same person (whoever that may be) dub both in I and III? Obviously in III it will need some mechanical alteration, but the same voice will not only go a long way in connecting Maul and Grievous, but will also GIVE Maul some dialogue in I since we're cutting all his original lines. Something along the lines of, "I sense great power in your young companion, Jedi. He will have to wait for another time, however. My priotity is the Queen." Then some fighting dialogue from Qui-Gon in response (coming from Batman Begins, Kingdom of Heaven, Rob Roy, etc.). Just a thought to emphasize this would-be plotpoint."

This was my breakdown of the final moments of RotJ in the "Unbearable HC" thread:
Mace will never be a force spirit; he did not learn the secret of immortality taught to Obi-Wan and Yoda by Qui-Gon. According to Lucas, they "caught" Anakin on the other side, although I'd much prefer it if Anakin just dissapeared after his death and it was assumed since he was the Chosen One it was natural for him to become one with the force. What I would like to see (I've posted this before), is this:

-Luke looks off to the distance.
-Old Obi-Wan and Yoda are there, and old Anakin appears.
-Luke smiles at them, and Leia comes over to him.
-Old spirits transform into their prequel trilogy selves, dressed appropriately (no cut-and-paste jobs).
-Luke and Leia join the rest of the group.
-Qui-Gon appears beside them and the group acknowledges each other.
-Final shot of the OT characters.
-NEW final shot of SAGA characters, the spirits.

Since the saga is really about Anakin, the final shot should feature him and the other full-saga characters. That, and I never liked that last shot of laughing Leia, clapping Lando, and dancing Ewoks. A new, triumphant musical cue should also be added to end the saga with an emotional bang. It would be nice to see Padme there with the rest of the spirits, to have Anakin reunited with his love and Luke and Leia see their mother, but the logistics of explaining how that would be possible would outrage many fans I'm sure. In my opinion, NOT seeing Padme really weakens the saga; what kind of happy ending is it when we're left to assume the hero's love is lost to oblivion? All that aside, seeing Qui-Gon makes perfect sense as he is the reason the rest of them are there in the first place.
Post
#161474
Topic
Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side (the TM edit) (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: InfoDroid
It's official, Commander Courage. You never agree with ANYTHING!!! I for one love the idea of a new love theme. Across the Stars was just a rehash of his Nixon soundtrack. And you're right, Trooperman, it reminds us too much of that horrible film called Attack of the Clones.

Regarding subtitles: Should we be working toward "burned" subtitles, like the ones burned into the picture in the original Greedo scene, or are we going to be using the ones that appear in the bottom black portion of the letterbox bars?

Well someone has to be a voice of reason in this group of "free thinkers." If you guys want to go the the trouble of totally replacing the perfectly acceptable love theme of Episodes II and III, that's just more work for you. I'll stand by Across the Stars.

Subtitles: bottom black portion of the widescreen bars, definitely. Just like in the official DVDs.