logo Sign In

Collipso

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
25-Oct-2017
Last activity
19-Oct-2018
Posts
2,430

Post History

Post
#1185805
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

I still don’t know why that makes TLJ better than RotJ in any way. Luke and Vader were the only characters that still had something worthwhile to do character wise because Han and Leia’s character arcs were done and they decided to take the safety route with them while going very risky with Vader and the Emperor. Apparently you think that that makes TLJ superior to RotJ. Ok, good. Am I correct? Is there more to it?

Post
#1185802
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Collipso said:

How do characters having almost no impact on the plot of the movie improve the movie? I mean, why?

There is more to a movie than plot. Movies are not created for the sole sake of a Wikipedia plot summary.

I agree

This is to say nothing about the fact that they do impact the plot.

I agree if you’re talking about Poe, but not about Finn. Still, both of them got a lot of good character development which is a lot more important.

Post
#1185788
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

lovelikewinter said:

I sometimes have a hard time telling when people are joking online. There should be a font for that.

I was thinking that the Last Jedi has the same issue Return of the Jedi has. The parts dealing with the Force and the Skywalkers are amazing, but it does leave the other characters a bit out of the loop. Rian tried to give Finn and Poe more to do than Han and Leia in ROTJ.

Well, Han and Leia in RotJ are crucial to the plot of that movie, very different from Finn and Poe in TLJ. Then again, the movies weren’t trying to do the same thing in terms of characters - but I’m not sure if that works as an excuse for TLJ.

Post
#1185697
Topic
Ranking Pizza
Time

My mom’s pizza is pretty good. We have a pizza oven and every Sunday we have homemade pizza for dinner and it’s delicious. My second favorite pizza would be a pizza I ate in Milan, and my third favorite a local pizza place’s pizza. I dislike Domino’s with all of my strengths though - pretty much the fast food of pizza and it’s trash. Sometimes it’s good, but I only have it once a year or less.

Post
#1185690
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

ray_afraid said:

TV’s Frink said:

Handman said:

I watched both when they were in theaters. I enjoyed both, but expected Boyhood to swamp all the awards, so rooted for Birdman because I felt it was the underdog and more entertaining. Boyhood was an experience, but one I wouldn’t really want to revisit.

Dek Rollins said:

Handman said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Everything is a product of its time.

But some more than others. I once again point to how Superman, although made 10 years earlier, ends up being much more timeless.

I mean, you may not be wrong, but you can’t tell me that Superman doesn’t ooze the seventies at some moments as well.


Fair enough. I guess what I’m trying to say is Batman feels like a movie of its time rather than a Batman movie, while Superman feels more faithful to the character. Superman is the first thing I’d point to if someone wanted me to explain the character, while Batman isn’t. It’s still a solid movie and I really enjoy it to this day.

Well as I’ve said multiple times already, it’s a Burton movie. And by extension it’s not a Batman movie.

Batman isn’t a Batman movie? I don’t quite follow what you’re saying here.

Have you seen it?

It’s not a Batman movie, it’s a Burton movie that happens to have Batman and happens to star The Joker.

It’s technically a Batman movie but presumably you get my point now.

Which (live action) Batman movies then are actually Batman movies and not just Martinson/Burton/Schumacher/Nolan films that happen to have Batman?

You might as well say Superman: The Movie was not a Superman movie but a Donner movie that happened to have Superman. Every director flavors their movies with their own style, so I’m not sure what the point is of Burton’s Batman not really being Batman.

If anything, you should say that about Shumacher’s films and not Burton’s.

I was going to answer but since you only gave me 19 minutes before you bitched that I hadn’t answered, now I’m not going to.

That’s a shame because I was actually quite interested in what you were going to reply.

Post
#1184028
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

TV’s Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Tobar said:

lovelikewinter said:

Why do people give a crap about Snoke?

Because he destroyed Luke’s Jedi Academy by seducing Ben Solo to the Dark Side? How is that not interesting?

Because Rian says it isn’t.

Lol no.

DrDre alone has gone over that countless times on the TLJ Review thread. Do we have to discuss that again?