logo Sign In

Chlorine

User Group
Members
Join date
24-Apr-2017
Last activity
12-May-2017
Posts
109

Post History

Post
#1070977
Topic
Red Tails
Time

SilverWook said:

Ewan also could have had some other project scheduled between the end of principal photography and the eventual reshoots months later.

Just seems weird that he wouldnā€™t just keep the beard/plan to grow it back out in time.
His beard in the movie isnā€™t even that long.

Glad I grew up (21) with AotC on VHS and I couldnā€™t tell that the beard was fake in some shots.
Then again it looks fine to me even now, since the the beard and the fake beard alternate so much, even within a scene. Itā€™s less jarring than if he, say, had the real one for first half the movie then had the fake one for the second half.

Post
#1070937
Topic
Red Tails
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Though I do not have a transcript of their probably private conversation, the Extended ROTK and ROTS endings have a very similar feel and flow, unless youā€™ve never seen the former, Iā€™m sure others here know what Iā€™m talking about.

I have seen the extended ROTK, and iā€™m not sure what youā€™re talking about. What is the equivalent of the ROTS Padme/Vader crosscutting in ROTK?

Both movies do a multiple ending/wrap up sequences thing, but thatā€™s different.

And TPM beat Jackson to the punch as far as multipronged climaxes go.

Post
#1070920
Topic
Red Tails
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

Chlorine said:

No way to know, it seems.

But we can guess based on the sharp decline in quality in many of the green screen sequences. Itā€™s the same in the PT, to a lesser degree. Whenever AOTC cuts to a green-screen re-shoot, the performance takes a nose dive.

I mean, why would you guess against the video evidence of Hemingway directing green screen cockpit footage?

Also, iā€™ve always wondered- why does Ewan have a fake beard in the re-shoots? Why did he shave if he knew they were coming back?

Post
#1070909
Topic
Red Tails
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

ā€˜Red Tailsā€™ was the best film Lucas had made for some time but itā€™s still got those Prequel problems. I suspect Lucas used the same modus operandi, shoot the movie, see what you got and then re-shoot 50% of it against a green screen. The difference is that unlike the prequels, there was a decent Director and solid cast for principle photography.

I disagree, I think the PT is much better than Red Tails.
At the very least it was better in terms of musical Score, cinematography (Tattersall>Aronson), and editing (Burtt did both, but Lucas did interesting (IMO) things in the PT such as intercutting Vaderā€™s ā€œbirthā€ with Padmeā€™s death that Red Tails didnā€™t do.)

Iā€™d bet Lucas did all that cockpit stuff on a green screen himself afterwards (Just my theory), as Hemingway is a proven talent with actors. He Directed half of ā€˜The People v. O. J. Simpsonā€™ which was one of the best Directed/Acted TV shows of recent years IMO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EioYvZ_jaAc
I see Hemingway directing the cockpit footage. (1:25).
Lucas is in the background in other shots, but heā€™s not telling the actors what to do. Hemingway is.

Post
#1070769
Topic
Red Tails
Time

I just watched Red Tails, and WOW. I like the Prequels and even I thought it was an almost total flatline. It wasnā€™t even outright bad per se, just very very bland, and felt like it was missing someā€¦ key ingredient.

I mean, where to start. Even the editing. The delivery of lines. The lines themselves.

Red Tails to me is how most of you here see the PT, I imagine.

Itā€™s funny because I noticed/liked the opening text/color of the text in relation to the other colors on screen and it reminded me of the title card/credits of the documentary George did on Coppolaā€™s movie The Rain People. (I think it was Rain People).

Iā€™d say one of the biggest things that dragged the movie down was the constant cockpit dialogue.
The acting was good/fine outside of those.

Is Ben Burtt a bad editor? Is Anthony Hemingway a bad director? Is John Ridley a bad writer?
How much did GL shoot himself? Do we know specifics?

Post
#1069758
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

TVā€™s Frink said:

Mocata said:

rodneyfaile said:

Rey was able to do a mind trick without even seeing it done or being trained regarding it, but she did experience Kylo reading her thoughts, so she isnā€™t entirely unfamiliar with the idea of manipulating with someoneā€™s mind.

This is the thing that bugs me, and itā€™s because of the execution - we donā€™t see her thought process at all. I came to this conclusion as well, but I shouldnā€™t have to mentally edit the film for them.

It seemed pretty obvious to me.

Iā€™m gonna second Mocata and say that I thought the mind trick scene seemed very ā€œout of universeā€. Like a ā€œremember this??ā€.
The in-story reasoning was non-existent.

Post
#1069715
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Iā€™d rather not repeat arguments Iā€™ve had here ad naseum, but Iā€™ll say thereā€™s only one egregious use of abilities from Rey, and thatā€™s the mind trick. Using the force in the duel is easily explained. Mazā€™s words were specifically that the force has always been there in her and if she closes her eyes she can feel it.

But then again you called Maz ā€œorange Yodaā€ so I donā€™t know why Iā€™m bothering.

I mean, they make a point to one up Yoda by saying sheā€™s not 900 years old, no, sheā€™s 1000 years old.
And sheā€™s a little knee high thing, and sheā€™s wise.

Oh sorry, didnā€™t realize that made them the exact same character. By that logic, at least 50% of all SW characters are rehashes of each other.

What is a joke?
Obviously she is not literally "Yoda, but orange."
BUT, she is used as a plot device for the for a similar purpose. She tells Rey about the force. And as I said, sheā€™s about as old as Yoda, she is also dimunitive, and she is also wise.

Again, I donā€™t know why I bothered. Joke or not, youā€™re still making a lame and really strained comparison. Just to poke one whole in, how is Yoda not ā€œObi-Wan, but small and greenā€?

Because my comparison was about both appearance and characteristics.

I can see thereā€™s no helping you.

touchƩ

Post
#1069697
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Iā€™d rather not repeat arguments Iā€™ve had here ad naseum, but Iā€™ll say thereā€™s only one egregious use of abilities from Rey, and thatā€™s the mind trick. Using the force in the duel is easily explained. Mazā€™s words were specifically that the force has always been there in her and if she closes her eyes she can feel it.

But then again you called Maz ā€œorange Yodaā€ so I donā€™t know why Iā€™m bothering.

I mean, they make a point to one up Yoda by saying sheā€™s not 900 years old, no, sheā€™s 1000 years old.
And sheā€™s a little knee high thing, and sheā€™s wise.

Oh sorry, didnā€™t realize that made them the exact same character. By that logic, at least 50% of all SW characters are rehashes of each other.

What is a joke?
Obviously she is not literally "Yoda, but orange."
BUT, she is used as a plot device for the for a similar purpose. She tells Rey about the force. And as I said, sheā€™s about as old as Yoda, she is also dimunitive, and she is also wise.

Again, I donā€™t know why I bothered. Joke or not, youā€™re still making a lame and really strained comparison. Just to poke one whole in, how is Yoda not ā€œObi-Wan, but small and greenā€?

Because my comparison was about both appearance and characteristics.

Post
#1069679
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

In an odd bit of coincidence, just saw this article posted today:
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2017/04/25/for-the-last-time-rey-is-not-a-mary-sue

Havenā€™t read it yet but with a headline like that, must be good.

That article isnā€™t very convincing, as it tries to make a false equivalence with Lukeā€™s much less one man journey in ANH.

Post
#1069674
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Chlorine said:

DominicCobb said:

Iā€™d rather not repeat arguments Iā€™ve had here ad naseum, but Iā€™ll say thereā€™s only one egregious use of abilities from Rey, and thatā€™s the mind trick. Using the force in the duel is easily explained. Mazā€™s words were specifically that the force has always been there in her and if she closes her eyes she can feel it.

But then again you called Maz ā€œorange Yodaā€ so I donā€™t know why Iā€™m bothering.

I mean, they make a point to one up Yoda by saying sheā€™s not 900 years old, no, sheā€™s 1000 years old.
And sheā€™s a little knee high thing, and sheā€™s wise.

Oh sorry, didnā€™t realize that made them the exact same character. By that logic, at least 50% of all SW characters are rehashes of each other.

What is a joke?
Obviously she is not literally "Yoda, but orange."
BUT, she is used as a plot device for the for a similar purpose. She tells Rey about the force. And as I said, sheā€™s about as old as Yoda, she is also dimunitive, and she is also wise.

Post
#1069669
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Iā€™d rather not repeat arguments Iā€™ve had here ad naseum, but Iā€™ll say thereā€™s only one egregious use of abilities from Rey, and thatā€™s the mind trick. Using the force in the duel is easily explained. Mazā€™s words were specifically that the force has always been there in her and if she closes her eyes she can feel it.

But then again you called Maz ā€œorange Yodaā€ so I donā€™t know why Iā€™m bothering.

I mean, they make a point to one up Yoda by saying sheā€™s not 900 years old, no, sheā€™s 1000 years old.
And sheā€™s a little knee high thing, and sheā€™s wise.

Post
#1069662
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

Haha donā€™t think Iā€™ve ever seen that done before in this conversation. Good job? I guess?

I wish the debate would die. With the Mary Sue thing, I feel like Iā€™ve said this waaay too many times, but the thing is that with the term there are misogynistic implications. Hypothetically that kind of criticism could be thrown against characters of any gender, but they rarely do. When people specifically mention her gender when talking about how implausible her abilities are, thatā€™s when the unfortunate implications become clear.

Ultimately, the term is just downright lazy. If people actually had well reasoned and thought out arguments about Reyā€™s characterization and how it affected the story/drama, Iā€™d be more willing to engage with them. But if theyā€™re just going to skip to name calling, thatā€™s where Iā€™ll brush them aside. If youā€™re just going to regurgitate something someone else has said on the internet, thereā€™s no point in wasting my time.

Mary Sue in this instance is usually less ā€œI have an issue with womenā€ and more ā€œshorthand for the numerous times she does things without earning them, perhaps in comparison to Lukeā€.

For instance, Luke had to see Kenobi do a mind trick- Rey somehow just knows the technique. Luke had Kenobi tell him to use the force in the trench run- Rey just gets a power-up in the forest by closing her eyes and remembering the force- both Luke and Rey had people tell the them about the force earlier in the movie (Kenobi and orange Yoda), but only Rey somehow just remembered the sageā€™s words and levelā€™d up.

etc.