logo Sign In

CatBus

User Group
Members
Join date
18-Aug-2011
Last activity
27-Jun-2025
Posts
5,996

Post History

Post
#565670
Topic
Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)
Time

none said:

CatBus what was your starting point for the subs?  Comparing Project Threepio to other sets and sentences are clustered differently.  Is sentence grouping something you want to get into? 

For the English subs it was pretty much a blank slate at the start, but I did refer to the official subs whenever I couldn't quite decipher something (and as I'm discovering, that might not have been a good move!).  The clustering goal was to maximize display time for subs (readability), and that took priority over almost everything else, including clusters that would seem more linguistically natural (question-answer, etc).  I allowed longer lines than the official subs but I still wouldn't let lines run over a certain length, so that was a factor too.

And I actually did the SDH subs first and retrofitted the regular subs from that, so part of the grouping was designed to leave space for SDH cues, even in subs that don't have those cues anymore (so you may see odd spaces where clusters COULD happen but don't).  Then the foreign subs were pretty closely derived from the official GOUT subs, but adjusted to this new timing/grouping.

Given that, I'm not surprised that my sentence grouping is different than all other subs out there.  And I'm not interested in changing it unless there's a major problem (not sure that's even possible).

Post
#565633
Topic
Was George Lucas a trickster the whole time?
Time

generalfrevious said:

Alright, he may have not have been a trickster the whole time, but I still think he didn't care about the continuity of the six films at all, and he has contempt for SW being successful from the beginning. Does that opinion make sense?

Not really. I'm going to throw out an alternate explanation that might appeal to you. It's not completely unheard of for someone integrally involved in the creation of a piece of art to completely fail to grasp its popular appeal. To borrow from another fanboy bucket, I've seen interviews with Sarah Michelle Gellar that make me think she just has know clue what Buffy the Vampire Slayer was even about. And yet she still made it come very much alive.

Same with Lucas, really. Maybe Lucas WANTED to make a trashy slapstick derivative space adventure with terrible dialogue and a backstory that's somewhere between inconsistent and incomprehensible. Honestly that DOES describe Buck Rogers, oft-cited as a SW inspiration. Maybe that WAS the "original vision" he's always going on about. But that's not what ultimately got created. I think it goes without saying that the influence of others brought a lot more gravity to at least the first two films, and made them much better movies.

So when Star Wars became a huge phenomenon, Lucas thought it was a validation of his "derivative slapstick" philosophy. He completely failed to grasp that it was the other stuff people liked. It's not a matter of his having hated Star Wars all along, it's a matter of him never comprehending what Star Wars was about to begin with (as far as its fans were concerned). Add to this the fact that he's a serial fiddler (look at the audio mixes for crying out loud), and it's only surprising the trilogy lasted as long as it did before he ran it into the ground.

It's not a pathological drive to destroy art, it's a pathological ego-driven failure to understand its value.  The result is the same.

Post
#565406
Topic
Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)
Time

Yep, I switched it to "their" upon further listening.  However, I'm leaving out the "Oh, no".  I'm sure there are many lines that were scripted and misspoken, or spoken but are so lost in the mix that I'm not subtitling them as scripted.  Subtitles are ultimately designed to show what you'd hear, and if it's even somewhat dubious if someone would even hear it, chances are I'm leaving it out.

Post
#565270
Topic
Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)
Time

Wow, thanks for the feedback, msycamore!  I think part of the problem with my grand plan was that the GOUT English subs were very inaccurate so I rarely used them for reference, so I had no proofreader other than myself.  So thank you very much for the proofread.

As far as my subjective take, I'm agreeing with all of your corrections (even "deflector screens") except the exclamation mark.  Although the line delivery is definitely unexcited, I think the exclamation still fits in context.

Also, thanks for the mono mix inserts/changes.  I won't be including them but I appreciate the additions.  Thanks also for the undeserved credit on the "more wealth" line.  If I tried to dub every inadequately articulated line as-is, I'd have a much harder job.  No, this was just an ordinary mistake.

I will be uploading corrected subs soon.

Post
#564999
Topic
Does anyone here still like Star Wars?
Time

Even our definition of "Star Wars" varies.  Mine is a trilogy of three films from 1977-1983.  If pushed, I will expand my definition to include the Holiday Special and some Ewok movies.

The Special Editions aren't Star Wars, they are impostors.  The prequels aren't Star Wars either, they are relatives of the impostors trying to tag along for the ride.  As such, hating them doesn't even remotely dampen my enthusiasm for Star Wars, because they are unrelated.

Post
#564995
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

I plan on bringing my copy of this to a Star Wars fan with an awesome home theatre and then lingering around a bit to see if maybe he wants to give it a spin.  Sure, I'll stay and watch with you!  He is not really aware of any of these preservation projects and only has a TR47 LD rip from many years ago.  I'm pretty sure I'll get invited back.

Post
#564981
Topic
Which version/release of the Star Wars movies do you watch and why?
Time

Paramecium302 said:

I watch whichever one is most convenient at the time.

I used to watch whatever was least convenient ;)

Not because I liked having to do a g----mn treasure hunt just to watch a movie ("OMG! Japanese Special Collection LD set is up on EBay! Must bid!"), but that was simply the only way to see it.  Now options are improving and it's almost as convenient & easy to see Star Wars now as it is to see any other movie.  But there are limits--I doubt Netflix will ever carry anything but the Special Editions, for example.

Post
#564977
Topic
Your first reaction to Hayden is ROTJ
Time

My first reaction upon seeing him?  Honestly, it was "Who the hell is that?"  I really had no idea who this goober was, but I was able to piece together from context that it was supposed to be Vader.

The two or three scenes I can actually remember from the prequels do not feature Hayden Christensen, which actually speaks well of him because my only memories of the PT are of the bits that caused me to leave the theatre.

Post
#564803
Topic
Which version/release of the Star Wars movies do you watch and why?
Time

silverwheel said:

CatBus said:

EDIT: This means that IMO fan edits are EXACTLY the same as the Special Editions, by every moral measure except fraud.

Considering that Lucas didn't direct ESB or ROTJ, I would argue that those Special Editions are rather morally questionable...

Well that's the fraud part, and Star Wars doesn't get off the hook either.  Fans can edit ESB or ROTJ and there's no problem with that because they don't claim to be the real thing.  If Lucas didn't pretend that the edited version was the real thing, there'd be no fraud on his end either.