CHEWBAKAspelledwrong

Actually if it were recessive, allowing the Jedi to have children with non sensitives would increase the amount of force sensitivity out there over time by introducing the gene into the general pool. It’s just that not every child would be force sensitive.

If you limited who they could have kids with, you’d end up after several generations with a very unhealthy genetic pool.

moviefreakedmind said:

Han seemed pretty shocked that Ben Kenobi hadn’t heard of the Falcon. I have no problem with it being a legend amongst smugglers.

While I agree I have no problem with the Falcon being famous, to be fair, feigned surprise could have been part of his sales pitch or ego.

SilverWook said:

Vader’s way of dealing with an Imperial officer he felt had failed him makes all the Force choking in ESB tame by comparison.

Pray tell? Or is there an EU spoiler policy :p

DuracellEnergizer said:

Some Semi-Literate Schmuck said:

I get so anger

LOL

How much do you want to bet IKnowWhatYourSockDidLastSummer is the kid who posted that?

IKnowWhatYouDidLastSummer said:

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

IKnowWhatYouDidLastSummer said:

TV’s Frink said:

The type that built this site? Lol.

Any grammatical error or something?

no

Then I don’t know what the question mark is doing there.

I’m pretty sure it’s the ironic type of question mark directed at the intelligence of the person who asked the question.

IKnowWhatYouDidLastSummer said:

TV’s Frink said:

The type that built this site? Lol.

Any grammatical error or something?

no

Jeez, the prospect of a “fancy” type theater showing one of the most famous movies of all time on a highly publicized tour… digitally projected in 2K is, well, not only depressing, but embarrassing.

If there’s one thing that points to any optimism on this issue (and more specifically, the potential for the adoption of Legacy), it’s that within a few years a large subset of consumers are going to expect 4K even on home media, and Lucasfilm literally cannot provide it now, even for f**king cinemas.

Unless they’re some new transfer. Why would they have explicitly called it '97 otherwise?

JediExile said:

TV’s Frink said:

With the brief exception of two Darth Lucas posts breaking things up…

Scrollin’ scrollin’ scrollin’…

Hey, someone else posted and broke things up a little.
If there’s a way I can shorten my post lengths by adding spoilers or what not like some forums allow, I’d love to make my posts a little smaller.

What?

For some strange reason I doubt a reputable movie theater would do that with prints loaned to it.

Also: http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/OT-Special-Editions-to-have-USA-Roadshow-Summer-16/id/49325

SilverWook said:

I’m not convinced one billboard in SF is going to sway Lucasfilm one way or the other. (Is it even anywhere near where Lucasfilm brass are sure to see it?) And 5k would go a lot farther on projects around here.

We would be better off flying over Skywalker Ranch, and releasing thousands of Sebastian Shaw Anakin figures on tiny parachutes. 😉

And the EU began in 1976? Splinter of the Mind’s Eye wasn’t even published until '78.

George would probably just melt them down in some perverse sadistic ritual.

Edit: actually, he’d probably chop off their heads and superglue Hayden heads on them.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Yeah, all those women in physically abusive relationships – I’m sure they’re just fine and dandy as sour candy as long as their partners are careful enough not to draw blood.

Believe it or not, that’s still the law in some countries.

Post Praetorian said:

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Serious:
Black Rain ('89), First Blood ('82), Fatal Attraction ('87), Die Hard ('88)

Funny:
Uncle Buck ('89), Caddyshack ('80), The Dream Team ('89), Major League ('89), Beverely Hills Cop ('84), Airplane ('80)

A “classic” that I hate: The Breakfast Club ('85)

Out of curiosity…why do you hate the Breakfast Club?

It’s been so long since I watched it. I was still in high school, and didn’t relate in any way to them, and I thought it was boring. I know I’m the outlier. …

moviefreakedmind said:

I agree. I didn’t understand why the special version would come in a paper case with the thickness of a greeting card.

Because it’s different enough for people to pay $5 extra for it/even be conned into buying multiple copies of the movie yet costs practically nothing to produce.

Dreamaster said:

Look for Mike’s first post on page 77 of this thread… And then enjoy the emotional ride. 😃

Prophetic?

HansiG said:

Lord Haseo said:

HansiG said:

If this is handled well, it could end up great. Tarantino movie in space (without the violence, obviously). If it’s not, wel…

Don’t you mean excessive violence?

In my book, if there’s not blood, it’s not violence

Even early Tarantino wasn’t excessively violent like Kill Bill, Django, and The Hateful 8, which actually depict more blood and gore than is realistic for the given situations. Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction had blood, sure, but it was realistic levels for the violence at hand. Star Wars is certainly violent, but not bloody, as most of the wounds are caused by lasers.

generalfrevious said:

And yet, the SE will be the only versions the public will be allowed to see for decades to come.

Evidence?

I love that old logo with the slanted “0.” Maybe we could keep “victory celebration” but with the original footage.

Nooooooooooooooooooo!

adywan said:

Great reporting by this guy. SMH. For one, i am NOT disabled and i don’t live in Northampton either.

Did he interview you for this? Or are those recycled quotes?

Nothing groundbreaking in the story, but great publicity for the cause. Probably some Mouse investors reading.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/star-wars-fans-feel-the-force-calling-them-back-to-original-cuts-1461012670

http://originaltrilogy.com/user/Something-Something/id/26167

The shooting script of SW refers to Vader as a"dark Lord of the Sith." The word is just never spoken.

Bingowings said:

It’s sort of weird he believes so quickly but maybe he has an instinct for these things in his genes. Midichlorians

:p