logo Sign In

Baronlando

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
16-Oct-2007
Last activity
19-Oct-2015
Posts
1,464

Post History

Post
#341883
Topic
Star Wars and Indiana Jones on Blu-Ray Discussion
Time

It seems like Lucas really doesn't feel like paying for the 3D thing until it becomes more cheap and commonplace. The bright side is that Star Trek and Lord of the Rings are doing their theatrical version-blurays sooner rather than later,  I guess because it gives them more opportunities to sell all the variations during the life of bluray. Let's hope LFL realizes there might be some bucks to be made doing it that way.

Post
#341720
Topic
Star Wars and Indiana Jones on Blu-Ray Discussion
Time

yeah, they were just unpacking them at best buy. It's just the individual 2006 2-discers but with the 2004 covers and a sticker that says both versions are included. classy!

(in other words it's both discs in this...http://www.markrh.com/dvd/images/StarWarsVI-ReturnOfTheJedi.jpg

instead of...

http://www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/Return_of_the_Jedi/return_of_the_jedi_original_dvd.jpg

Post
#340603
Topic
Question about the 1995 VHS and when the Special Edition was going to be the only version
Time

Side question: Does anybody remember the 1997 versions looking VERY different in the theater than in all the subsequent video releases? My recollection is that the prints were really fantastic and natural looking, with none of the various weird tints and cartoony colors of the tapes and discs that came after.

Post
#340305
Topic
Question about the 1995 VHS and when the Special Edition was going to be the only version
Time

I remember that campaign quite well. In fact there was a HUGE billboard (with that half-face Vader from the laserdisc/vhs covers) that I passed every day going to school that said "get the original ONE LAST TIME". At the time it was no big deal because, hey, what could ever be better than laserdisc? Lucas had been on the rag for years about a couple of cantina masks and some of the X-Wing manuevers, but nobody expected whole scenes would be turned into fucking Who Framed Roger Rabbit. (Actually, my friend thought the Jabba scene looked more like those Frosted Flakes commercials)

Post
#338816
Topic
When did the prequels officially suck?
Time
negative1 said:

there were 3 more sequels for jaws,

2 more for 'the godfather',

and 2 tv-spinoffs, and 2 movie sequels for 'animal house'..

i doubt any of those made any impact, or created more fans for the original..

unlike 'star war's where all the new material has created a larger, bigger,

fan-following, and demand for more movies/tv shows/books/comics etc..

later

-1

Who gives a shit about "impact" besides entertainment reporters?

 

Post
#338804
Topic
When did the prequels officially suck?
Time
negative1 said:

face it, without any new star wars material... you'd be

======================================

1) bored out of your minds

2) watching your same videos over again for the 100th time

3) fantasizing about new some new stars that would NEVER come out...

 

yeah, that's why i like living in the past so much, because i don't have to

face reality, and the present.......... and be stuck there with the bunch of

you that wish it were true..

 

later

-1

 

 

The hell??

If it had all ended in 1983, it would be no different than The Godfather or Jaws or Animal House or any other well-liked movie from that era. It'd be on your shelf and you could watch it if you felt like it, life goes on. THE END.

Post
#338557
Topic
When did the prequels officially suck?
Time
negative1 said:

"it too was aimed at children ... because judging from the marketing

perspective, that's what sold the movie to the studio, and other investors, in looking at the

long term profits..."

That's not really true. The toys were almost a YEAR after the fact, they were completely unprepared for that kind of kid interest, and had nothing ready for the kids. The studio even GAVE UP its merchandising rights, thinking them to be worthless.  It was not initially marketed to children, it was sold to sci-fi/ comic book guys (at conventions etc.) along the same demographic as Star Trek.

Post
#338503
Topic
When did the prequels officially suck?
Time

It's probably not that personal. "It's strictly business, Sonny." From a recent Clone Wars article:

Tartakovsky explained that he got "The Clone Wars" gig, which was thought up by Lucasfilm Ltd., because the action figures for the recent Star Wars movies weren't selling as well as they had hoped.

Cartoon Network has a relationship with Hasbro, the company that produces Star Wars action figures.

Post
#338093
Topic
[image] -> _how_lucas_lucasfilm_changed_the_world_
Time
astromech said:

There is a difference between praising a person for his more wide reaching influences on an industry/area than there is for constantly bashing him for making changes to his creation. This is more a thread congratulating the man on his achievements outside Star Wars - of course it would end up praising him as without Star Wars, we'd still be using sticky tape and wires in our SFX...

 

 

Douglas Trumbull would disagree.