logo Sign In

Asaki

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Apr-2008
Last activity
19-Dec-2025
Posts
1,039

Post History

Post
#658353
Topic
Star Wars on Super8 (Released)
Time

poita said:

...there is plenty of gate weave in the film even with the sprockets totally stabilised, that is just how it was.

Oh, okay. I thought it looked worse in the wet gate footage, but I didn't do a side-by-side comparison, so I'm probably just imagining it.

poita said:

I can get a brand-spanking never been projected ESB print for about a grand, just have to rustle up the funds.

Derann didn't do Empire though, did they?

Post
#658187
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

yotsuya said:

But I really think that to avoid a total shutdown from legal action that the raw film scans needs to be shared as widely as possible. If it is everywhere, they can't stop it.

I don't think that's going to be a problem. I'm sure 24 hours of one single torrent would be enough to keep it alive for many years (though I suppose it might take longer to download than a typical DVD-shrink).

Post
#656723
Topic
Info: The JSC thread
Time

poita said:

If you have any frames with smearing I'd like to check them against mine.

 Here's a bunch: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/STAR-WARS-V8-A-Final-Attempt/post/335898/#TopicPost335898

To save you some time, out of that batch, these three are the most noticable. Maybe I'm using the wrong terminology, but all of the colors "bleed" to the right:

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/8128/190pe9.jpeg

^ note especially the blue and red buttons/lights on the control panel

http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/7114/130ht0.jpeg

^ the colors on his badge (medals, I guess?)

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/2913/50ap9.jpeg

^ almost everything

 

I know some of you guys have talked about trying to fix it before, but I don't think anyone got too far with it yet.

Post
#654476
Topic
Help: looking for... Waterworld - Sci-fi TV cut, in HD?
Time

The Ulysses Cut is probably still around. It's fullscreen and about Laserdisc quality, but it's watchable. It's not entirely the Sci-Fi version though, it's has every single "deleted" scene he could get his hands on, from several different sources.

I still find it hard to believe that the official release can look that bad. Has anyone ever uploaded any clips of it in motion?

Post
#653975
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

Sprocket hole stabilization should be "good enough". There's going to be gate weave in the composite scenes, so it will be impossible to fix everything (unless you're Mike Verta and you disassemble and reassemble everything), and by then, everything will be unnaturally still.

As long as it's not the GOUT, or The Brave Little Toaster (ugh), I think you'd just end up spending months of work and frustration on something that's not that noticable.

Post
#653972
Topic
Star Wars on Super8 (Released)
Time

frank678 said:

@Asaki, did you mean the youtube clip that negative1 posted some stills from here: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Star-Wars-Colortiming-Cinematography-was-What-changes-was-done-to-STAR-WARS-in-93/post/569016/#TopicPost569016 this might have gone through a different chain perhaps

 Yeah, I think that's the one. Certainly not a very good reference =)

Post
#653783
Topic
Star Wars on Super8 (Released)
Time

frank678 said:

Asaki said:

It's a little less colorful than I was expecting, but looks pretty awesome.

I think it would be possible to make things 'pop' a bit more with some adjustments - I had tried a quick and nasty boost https://vimeo.com/72009834 but I would be worried of doing too much in case of ruining the nice texture the original has

 I'm not saying the colors are bad, I just remember them being slightly different (a little more greenish?), but that's coming from the memory of a YouTube video of the film being projected onto a wall...so not exactly the best reference =)