logo Sign In

AntcuFaalb

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Jun-2012
Last activity
9-Feb-2025
Posts
4,267
Web Site
https://ssl.reddit.com/r/AMPSdeux

Post History

Post
#671124
Topic
Jedi Council Forum Laughs
Time

darklordoftech said:

AntcuFaalb said:

darklordoftech said:

Here's something on TFN that's sure to make us all laugh: a popular theory there is that "The Tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise" is forshadowing that Darth Plagueis will be the villain of the sequel trilogy.

Who is Darth Plagueis?

According to a "Sith legend" that Palpatine tells Anakin in Episode 3, Darth Plagueis was a Sith Lord who could have saved Padme, but ultimately was murdered by his own apprentice.

Thanks! I barely remember Episode III.

Post
#671105
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

Joel said:

team_negative1 said:

A couple of weeks will clean a few seconds of film.

Team Negative1


Argh - forgive my frustration here, but this vague, grammatically-challenged proclamation doesn't even address my question, it just re-states what I already said - in essence, "This is taking a long time."

My question is: WHY does it take a couple of weeks? I'm curious as to why it's taking so long, that's all. 

Since physically cleaning a few frames takes less than 1 second, we must be talking about digital cleanup.

I'm a digital media guy, so I'm having a hard time understanding why it would take someone with a modern computer *weeks* to do anything.  Photoshop, After Effects - is the "team" using these? If not, why not? 

Am I grossly oversimplifying?! Probably!

The team is using a program that I've worked with quite a bit. (PM me for the name.)

The reason it takes weeks is that:

(1) Despite the fact that this particular program has an incredible state-of-the-art automatic dirt/dust fix tool, you have to examine each frame individually to guarantee that the tool didn't produce any unwanted artifacts (e.g., "cleaning" someone's pupil). Furthermore, you have to modify the settings to work best with each and every shot.

(2) If you're careful and the automatic dirt/dust fix tool doesn't produce any unwanted artifacts, then you're most likely left with dirt/dust that you need to clean manually. This takes a long time.

(3) Other kinds of damage (e.g., scratches and tears) are much harder to fix.

(4) Each member of the team has a life outside of OT.com. They're only working in their free time.

In conclusion, it's not just about pushing buttons and waiting for progress bars to finish. The team has to painstakingly examine and restore each and every one of the ~175,000 frames in Star Wars.

If you want to better understand what's involved in digital film restoration, then please PM me and I'll hook you up with everything you need to try it out first-hand.

Post
#671001
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

timdiggerm said:

AntcuFaalb said:

TV's Frink said:

At the risk of sounding more stupid than usual...what's a linefeed?

US-ASCII (and character-sets derived from it, including Latin-1 and UTF-8) have two character-codes that signify "move to the next line":

10: Line Feed, a.k.a., New Line

13: Carriage Return

http://www.asciitable.com/index/asciifull.gif

*n*x systems (e.g., GNU/Linux) use a single Line Feed to represent newlines. Classic pre-OSX Mac systems used a single Carriage Return to represent newlines. Microsoft systems (e.g., MS-DOS and Windows) use a Carriage Return followed by a Line Feed to represent newlines.

These terms come from the typewriter days of old...

Carriage Return -> return the carriage to the start position

Line Feed -> move to the next line on the paper

And, I would think, carried over because dot-matrix printers are just like that.

Yes, and teletype machines (UNIX was developed on one).

Post
#670980
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

TV's Frink said:

At the risk of sounding more stupid than usual...what's a linefeed?

US-ASCII (and character-sets derived from it, including Latin-1 and UTF-8) has two character-codes that signify "move to the next line":

10: Line Feed, a.k.a., New Line

13: Carriage Return

http://www.asciitable.com/index/asciifull.gif

*n*x systems (e.g., GNU/Linux) use a single Line Feed to represent newlines. Classic pre-OSX Mac systems used a single Carriage Return to represent newlines. Microsoft systems (e.g., MS-DOS and Windows) use a Carriage Return followed by a Line Feed to represent newlines.

These terms come from the typewriter days of old...

Carriage Return -> return the carriage to the start position

Line Feed -> move to the next line on the paper