logo Sign In

Alderaan

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
3-Dec-2014
Last activity
3-Oct-2017
Posts
1,461

Post History

Post
#1066033
Topic
ADR Syncing
Time

Thanks for your reply Alex. I have .VOB files of the movie. Just the same single audio and video source. The sync looks good in the .VOB files but the video is distorted and needs some cropping and other work, plus I want to do a fan edit as well. When I import into my editing software, Premiere Pro, the sync is inconsistent…it varies without rhyme or reason from watchable to distracting. When I slow down and inspect frame by frame, usually the audio leads the video by a few frames. When I export, the opposite is actually happening. The audio lags the video even more noticeably.

Post
#1065883
Topic
Celebration 2017 Speculation
Time

imperialscum said:

As I have already said, the simple thing is that OOT release is just not profitable enough for them to care. While it might bring millions, that is still a change compared to billions they are making with other stuff.

This isn’t the reason at all.

George Lucas is … still … the reason why we don’t have an official OOT. Disney could give it to us any time they want, but they have obviously told us all to **** off and keep paying for their shit movies.

Post
#1065841
Topic
ADR Syncing
Time

I have acquired video files for a TV film that I’m restoring to its original cut.
Thread here: http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/AD-Anno-Domini-1985/id/54709

I haven’t done a restoration project of this magnitude before, and I’m having a lot of difficulty with sensitivity to the A/V sync. The audio is definitely leading the video (not by much) but it feels inconsistent and it’s driving me insane.

I’m really hoping that I don’t have to go back and correct the audio scene-by-scene for an almost 10 hour miniseries. I’ve tried lagging the audio by a frame or two, which sometimes helps, and sometimes still feels off. And I’ve tried lagging the audio by as many as 10 frames, where it is clearly behind the video. Nothing seems to work.

Does anyone have experiencing syncing A/V with only one audio source?

Post
#1065829
Topic
Are retrospective changes just fan service?
Time

towne32 said:

Alderaan said:

towne32 said:
Some things in 1997 were probably Lucas’s original vision. Other things are surely bullshit.

This could be a fun discussion–speculating on the reasons behind each and every change.

Someone here at one point speculated that some of the most pointless 2011 changes might have been done with 3D in mind.

R2’s rocks
Jabba’s door
The Dug thing
(maybe the sparks in ESB?).

Compositing in new items on a different plane makes for easy things that can be forced to ‘pop’ in 3D.

It’s also been pointed out to me that some of the audio changes were done because LFL lost the originals or the original audio had been damaged. Luke’s changed dialogue to R2 in Empire Strikes Back being one of the examples.

Post
#1065783
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

CatBus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Money and power have always been the basis of her rhetoric.

I think we’re all clear on what you think of Trump. There is a little wonderment, though, about what noises you may hear when Clinton moves her lips.

^Same could be said for you and the others.

At least in this case, I heard more or less the same thing coming from Clinton as you. It’s the thought that Trump is less of a warmonger hell-bent on money and power causing the head-scratching around here.

Trump has often contradicted himself on this. He has said we should stay out of other countries, but he’s also said we should bomb people and take their natural resources.

When people contradict themselves, it shows they just don’t give a damn. Hillary famously had her “public and private” positions, depending on who she was speaking to. Trump changes his mind depending on which advisor has been kissing his ass more and flattering him lately.

They are both terrible, terrible people.

Post
#1065670
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

imperialscum said:

The worst thing about TFA is not that it is a rehash per se. The worst thing is that its sotryline is a complete shit.

In a good plot, elements naturally lead from one to another, are indispensable with respect to each other and (most importantly) all have a strong connection to the plot objective. On the other hand, TFA shitty “plot” is just a combination of random elements completely unrelated to the plot objective (i.e. search for Luke).

Nevertheless, the fact that they put so many unrelated rehash elements into the film played a major role in storyline becoming a disjointed unrelated pile of crap.

Whenever he discovered the theme or premise for his screenplay, Paddy Chayefsky used to write it down on a piece of paper and tape it on his typewriter, so that nothing he ever typed wouldn’t reinforce that central idea of what his story was all about.

Unity of composition

Someone else described TFA quite well: they said it was more like an amusement park ride than a story. Just a device for whirling you around from one Star Wars visual to another.

Post
#1065650
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

ray_afraid said:

“Nuh-uh!” “Uh-huh!” “Nuh-uh!” “Uh-huh!” “Nuh-uh!” “Uh-huh!” “Nuh-uh!” "Uh-huh!"
Glad to see this thread is still the same 'ol thing.

Any thread with Fink in it will turn that way. His petulance is legendary.

Pro tip: it really works him over the most when you ignore all of his I-just-can’t-help-myself replies.

Post
#1065261
Topic
Celebration 2017 Speculation
Time

SilverWook said:

Okay, cool kids who do the twitter thing, depending on which way the wind is blowing tomorrow, who do we tweet a response at? Disney, Lucasfilm, or both?
I’m thinking of saving the open letter thing for the actual 40th anniversary next month.

CobraKai, I think, gave you the corporate addresses. But I think your best bet is to tweet at peripheral people and organizations. Those who will get the buzz going or even throw something up on their blog or article.

It would be wonderful if Disney or LFL responded, but I think the odds are much less than 3,720 to 1.

Post
#1065254
Topic
Celebration 2017 Speculation
Time

crissrudd4554 said:
The thread title clearly says ‘Celebration 2017 SPECULATION’. You’re asking people about a breakoff point to something they are actually speculating in regards to the event. How is that going off topic???

There is no break off point. GET OVER IT!

So next week, you are still going to be speculating whether or not there will be an OOT announcement at Celebration 2017? Interesting.

Post
#1065223
Topic
Celebration 2017 Speculation
Time

Maybe English isn’t your first language, I don’t know. But you’ll have to go back and point out where I said there shouldn’t be speculation in this thread, or where I said the discussion should be about whether speculation is stupid or not.

I asked a question, which some people chose to respond to directly, while other people chose to fight phantom battles in their own minds with languages they have apparently not yet mastered.