Moved from the MeBeJedi forum to get that room back on topic and yet to still weigh in with that room.
Originally posted by: DanielB
ADigitalMan, to answer your question. Do people look at original art for any particular reason? Why do people look at picassos rather than MY IMPROVED "picasso paintings"? Are you telling me, if Picasso painted a dull looking picture, and I made it look better you would prefer to look at my version of it rather than picasso's original?
I have three points to make, then I'm done with this issue:
1) DanielB, you have no problem using the forum's editing function to revise/fix your thoughts after they've been published. Don't cast stones in your house of glass.
2) How many Picassos do you own? How many Picassos have you seen in person? Do you not think that looking at a Picasso in a book hasn't had some form of alteration to make it appropriately presentable in the medium in which you've viewed it? If there is no point in viewing a Picasso except as intended by Picasso himself, then one should ONLY view the version hanging in the gallery, and never own a lithograph, a book, or a photo, because ALL OF THESE CONTAIN ALTERATIONS FROM THE ARTIST'S ORIGINAL. It's inescapable.
3) Getting back to Star Wars, I have nothing against preservists preserving the O-OT. But which O-OT gets to be preserved in your mind? Why is the DE LD worth preserving when it too contains revisions from the original theatrical version? You crap all over somebody correcting a frame that needs correcting, but yet you say nothing about the drastic changes from the 1977 theatrical version to the 1981 theatrical version, AND you accept the 1993 Laserdisc version which we know sports changes from the original.