logo Sign In

ABC

User Group
Members
Join date
7-Jan-2009
Last activity
21-May-2010
Posts
1,019

Post History

Post
#409991
Topic
J. Williams & LSO: The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Restored Score: the *AUDIOPHILE EDITION* (Covers & Documentary Booklet)
Time

... What kind ?

The booklet gets big enough: from about 40 pages forseen in the begining it actually comes to almost 60... lol! There must be about 15 pages of liner notes and credits- including a couple of pages for transitions - and believe me they're not too talkative: there's only the essential (... Nevertheless, the essential of all).

Post
#409924
Topic
J. Williams & LSO: The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Restored Score: the *AUDIOPHILE EDITION* (Covers & Documentary Booklet)
Time

msycamore said:

I know you have already made up your mind about wich font to use, but I actually prefer the (classic) font on the bottom one.

 I only tried on the ones I've posted since now. It deserves to be tried on many and I'll try both types on all the pages (thanks to your input).

I may be very influencable on that matter, and even wonder about the use of this modern type on the covers.

Edit: Mmmmhhh, more lisible indeed...

 

Post
#409748
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

Ooooh well... OK.

You deserve these:

I present you my sincere apologies Frink for havin' been boring to you in your thread!

That said, I think you really should consider the relentlessness mentioned in my last post. You may largely have gone farest than I did myself (in a short amount of time) - (edit) even though I began first - and that is not reported in your threads with quotes... I don't ask for apologies though, but please: just get a doctor.

PS: ... And my apologies to Moth3r too if he felt boring with me or with these childish fights.

Post
#409729
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

TV's Frink said:

Why am I still trying to explain this?  I know you understand it.

 

I was with the idea to post a very last one to end this on a positive note, thinking for myself "why don't you apologize after all" ?...

Then I have just remembered the true reason why I don't feel I have to, having in mind the relentlessness you already put in trying to bring me down already through 2 others of my threads, notably.

Must be said you're not really part of my life so I didn't remember until then.

No rancour then, but your behaviour is finally the only last reason for me to be free from your demand. Simply.

 

This time, Bye.

PS: the snake you chose to represent yourself just above is justly brightly and opportunately chosen.

Post
#409708
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

TV's Frink said:

I honestly try to follow your English but sometimes your meaning escapes me.  Regarding defamation, you should show where I have stated a falsehood before you use that word.

The significance around here wich may be different than English is: to attack the somebody's image and/or honour.

There is another HUGE difference between you and me.  I have apologized.  You have not.  I have admitted wrongdoing.  You have not.  Consider how that looks to others.

 I waited for this one. I gave you my point once and I think I was honest enough to soften a lot the circumstances. It has had the opposite effects unfortunately.

Anyway, that was my last post in the Off-Topic forum, so your thread is now fully potentially safe... If Davnes is wise enough !

My apologies still not, but my sincere regards for sure.

 

Post
#409701
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

The case was closed quick enough in my thread thanks to your comprehension. That's finally ok. Otherwise I should ask to remove the other posts. But if the mods take a look in my thread and do so, that's ok too. Also I appreciate your apologies.

For what's is about defamation, as far as not everybody knows where your stuff is quoted from and as you obviously target an audience, I hold on it for the present context.

Now please note this one HUGE notable difference between you and me when we adress each other: one treat the other with the most insulting words... And this is going on. I told you once it was not agreable for anyone to read such things and it looks like Bingo testifies.

Now what to think about a thread made to gnaw again and again an old rancour with me allowing you to extend your insults so lavishly, whatever it's about me or someone else besides ? I really didn't care in the begining, but as far as you're going on in this unhealthy task, the least I can do is to point the present post to the mods and ask from them to delete this thread, please... For the good of your mental health, and everyone's.

Post
#409679
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

 

Thanks for your consideration Bingo.

It made me at least edit my previous post, not to make people discover something that is rather indeed to be forgotten.

About the last few days, the thread is about... "whatever ABC wants", was in fact - and I knew it since the begining: the thread is about "how to stab ABC in the back". Perhaps you haven't see it coming but as I replyed in my thread, he was watching for me at the wrong turn. The proof is what he posted just before he opened the new thread... "to me":

 

TV's Frink said:

That's my point - I know he contributes a lot outside of this thread, but he's being an ass in this thread, and specifically he's being an ass to me. In my thread, no less.

If I were an ass like him, I'd start posting NSFW images in his Preservation thread. And don't think I'm not sorely tempted.

 

... Meanwhile, as I finally played the game and giving nothing that could serve his Vendetta, he used something else.

I have no problem with Mr Frink. I just watch him hit the wind deploying his hunger trying to reach me for - well how many ? 4 or 5 "potentially NSFW" images I posted among 70 pages of his topic?... And they where always (but one) related to topic !

It's been a while since I haven't, and the one quoted in the first post of this thread (wich was related to fire - the context !!!) is just a stupid and non-offensive heroic fantasy image. I actually think Frink was more offended by the ironical text wich accompagnied the picture...

In the wait you succeed in giving the straight image of yourself around you Mr Frink, while you put so much effort in trying to spoil mine so much for a few minor provocations, I'd have only one word to tell you seeing such virulent expenditures:

"Mirror".

 

With most sincere regards,

ABC - Jedi ReMaster ;)

 

Post
#409661
Topic
ABC's NSFW Thread (NSFW) (Undercard: TVF vs. vfp)
Time

TV's Frink said:

ABC said:

I'm sorry to announce you the user of this profile has been taken to the hospital due to a sudden heart attack.

- His wife.

^On-topic

 

 You forgot to show the post before wich was at the origin of mine - Never forget the context:

TV's Frink said:

ABC said:

Please frighten me !

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/avatars/custom/avatar-2162.png

 

What you are doing taking witnesses among people (members) beeing totally unawared of the original context has a name: That's called DEFAMATION.

... And you dare calling me "lame"...

 

I think I'm going to ask the mods a little wash this time, if you don't want to study closer your misdeeds since 24 hours.

(edit...) You know what I'm talking about- ¨^On topic ?

 

Post
#409652
Topic
J. Williams & LSO: The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Restored Score: the *AUDIOPHILE EDITION* (Covers & Documentary Booklet)
Time

Thanks. Actually it's fixed: the "modern" one was only too big. I keep it... And I think you're right :)

Besides the contrast with the retro type left and the modern one works as well as the contrasting worlds and technologies in the film. Not to be intellectualized of course, just it came to my mind while replying.

Post
#409649
Topic
J. Williams &amp; LSO, The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK <em>AUDIOPHILE EDITION</em> - Restored &amp; Remastered Score (Released)
Time

 

Thanks BMB,

First don't worry for the guy, he wouldn't have taken care to remove its avatar 12 hours after if he was really ready to left his life behind.

Thanks a lot for the feedback. I don't understand why do you think it's not useful to give one when it is the main purpose of this thread, or of any thread. Besides, without them I would feel a bit - or completely - like being said "release your stuff and shut the f**k up"... Notably when I notice the thread has been viewed about 1000 or 2000 times since I posted samples...

Ok, so here's reported my last post before we went to discuss off topic, perhaps it'll make things clearer...

 

... Sorry for the "specialized" discussions. It's not that much the purpose of the thread, though it may be helpful to deal with a few remaining details.

If anyone want to share their point about the few samples and the work as presented here (or even on the ones presented before), they're more than welcome whatever it is positive or not.

Besides I'm begining to wonder a lot on how much this work and its value are beeing seen here on OT.com, and if it really "contributes" to the preservation of these Master-Pieces, or to the quality of their restitution. What I'm sure about, is that no feedbacks contribute not to preserve it at all. But if this thread doesn't work it's no problem.

Perhaps such a restoration and remastering as presented here, by someone who developped its abilities as an aside with great simplicity of ways and approach looks more like spreading what Moth3r calls... the "Fuckwit factor"?! That would suck, for sure.

A mess, having myself no doubt anymore on the solidity of the resulting piece and imagining that if such a thread would be seen by LFL for instance - as they surely don't ignore OT.com -, from a "marketing" point of view it makes obvious one thing: bringing the OT scores to a superior level of rendition is finally of very, very little interest.

 

Well this is my last post for a time anyway. I felt it was of a great interest to present the project here, and it finally helped me to present it in a more professional way - thinking about the liner notes, the technical language etc... (as I can see there are big is lacks in my intro posts).

I will change the OP in a few days to sum up in a better way is intented in this virtual edition, and will give a more convenient synthetic vision of the remixing details (post 2). I'll advert the change in the thread title...

 

Now, don't force yourseves, just if you like both the project and ist sound, please speak your hearts. ;)

 

See ya'

 

Post
#409421
Topic
J. Williams &amp; LSO, The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK <em>AUDIOPHILE EDITION</em> - Restored &amp; Remastered Score (Released)
Time

TV's Frink said:

If you don't want this stuff in your thread, stop bringing it into mine.

I even haven't contested. Of course you waited for me at the turn to post your "sillyness" in there. No problem, that's fair. But just watch the costs. Nobody would have reacted the way our fellows did where it has been posted. Never forget the context.

Edit:

Ripplin said:

Alrighty then, let's just put this incident behind us now and concentrate on the audio goodness. :)

Ooops, yep. Thanks ;)

Post
#409404
Topic
J. Williams &amp; LSO, The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK <em>AUDIOPHILE EDITION</em> - Restored &amp; Remastered Score (Released)
Time

Be sure Frink knew exactly what he was doing posting that in "my" thread(despite he does the innocent guy who would have been fooled). So, I propose you go and have a discussion with him guys because I'm sure he know enjoys the consequences... Not cool for anybody in the end, uh ?

Post
#409398
Topic
J. Williams &amp; LSO, The EMPIRE STRIKES BACK <em>AUDIOPHILE EDITION</em> - Restored &amp; Remastered Score (Released)
Time

Sorry Ripplin. I haven't post such thing anywhere else than the "recreating" part of the forum and only Frink faces is responsabilities chosing to post this here, out of the original context. Melting his own *sense of humor* in a thread that has nothing to do with it is his choice, not mine... Whatever the words are originally mine or not.