logo Sign In

zombie84

User Group
Members
Join date
21-Nov-2005
Last activity
12-Jan-2024
Posts
3,557

Post History

Post
#284455
Topic
Darabount rips Lucas over Indy IV script
Time
Originally posted by: generalfrevious
Well, what will inevitably happen is that the Indy fanbase will love it, then eventually find a zillion thing to hate about it. Just like how each installment of the PT was. Now Im beginning to realize that the PT is the absolutely, soul-wrenching, worst film in human existence, now and thousands of years into the future. Indy 4 will be the fourth worst made film ever made for all time. Period.


Its not apt to compare them like that. Theres no common crew except Lucas and he is mostly hands off, aside from selecting the story. If Lucas came up with the PT story, had Speilberg shoot it, Koepp write it, Kahn edit it and Kaminski shoot it, it would have been three of the greatest films since the original Star Wars. Its two completely different set of variables.
Post
#284440
Topic
Darabount rips Lucas over Indy IV script
Time
Originally posted by: TheCassidy
^ Mm-hmm. Like I've said countless time, the Star Wars films are all about the SFX informing the story, whereas with most films the story informs the SFX.

Story does not equal SFX, which is something I'm afraid Lucas understands a lot less than someone like Spielberg. The reason Star Wars and Jaws (and Raiders to a lesser extent) are so good is that the filmmakers weren't comfortable, things were constantly going wrong and they were forced to improvise. Lucas was in a position of great influence and wealth when the Prequels were made, so there wasn't that voice in his head going, "I can't do this, it's going to cost too much," which is never a bad thing.

Proof of my theory? What does the majority prefer - Star Wars with Jabba or Star Wars sans Jabba?

What I'm getting to is that this is why all of this nonsense about Indiana Jones IV and the Potential of Suck is unfounded.

I know I'm not well liked around these parts, I can deal with it - just hear me out and consider what I'm about to say before blacklisting me again.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present my case on why Indiana Jones IV and the Prequels could not be more dissimilar.

1) Lucas is the bank and the story "author," and not in a position of putting his clever wit all over the script.
2) Spielberg is the Director, a man Lucas calls, "My Director," which means he will back off when it comes to major creative decisions.
3) The editing of the Prequels, by Ben Burtt and George Lucas sucked. Michael Kahn is editing Indiana Jones IV.
4) The cinematography, Kaminski, shot Saving Private Ryan and many other spectacular looking films. Just imagine that!
5) David Koepp wrote what matters - the script. The dialogue, the pacing, the character arcs...EVERYTHING that matters comes from him.
6) Shia "Son of Indy" LeBouef has been seen as controversial. Indy has a son? What? Now go and watch War of the Worlds and see what a touching Father and Son relationship Koepp crafted in the middle of all those SFX and explosions. The potential for a really touching story that matters is there. Honestly.


I have high optimistic hope for this film and I at least hope that some of my points are impressed upon one person. Thanks.


Very well made points. I've said it before that the prequels and Lucas' current talents don't really have the impact that some fear. But i think the dread with regards to Indy IV is that it seems so superfluous--Crusade was a terrific capper to the franchise, i great way to say goodbye, and really does feel like "the end." I'm interested in seeing what they do with Indy IV, but i can't help but feel like even if it is as good as it can possibly be that it still is somehow cheapening the series. I am psyched about the crew though--Speilberg has a very well-honed entourage and knows how to tell a character-driven action film; if the script was a piece of shit, something that Lucas would have come up with, Speilberg would simply say "George this script is unconvincing, lets re-write it." And he's done that before, so its not like Speilberg is at the mercy of Lucas because Speilberg doesn't have to operate like that.

But there is reason to be suspicious. I mean Temple of Doom had pretty good writing and directing, and the actors were all talented but people seem to regard it as a weak film (i personally love it), and while Crusade nailed down the bouncy humor and fundamental character-centric view of Raiders it basically re-treaded the exact same territory and relied too much on jokes. I guess to some who loved Raiders as a brilliant adventure film, anything tacked on seems to be cheap. I recently watched Raiders last week after not having seen it in a good three or four years and was amazed at how much of a terrific character film it is--the entire first hour is just character development and intrigue and i found this the best part of the film, simply for the terrific period atmosphere and interesting characters. I also forgot how much Indiana Jones had changed--his conception in this film is pure Bogart, he's the dirty drunk at the bar that sleeps with women and shoots people in the back if he has to; he got cleaned up a lot since kids fell in love with the film. Kasdan just gave Raiders such heavy characterisation and it harks back to the 30's character pieces so much--the film is more like Casablanca crossed with Treasure of the Sierra Madre--its only in the chase scenes in the last forty minutes that the fast-paced serial formula really takes over.
Post
#284135
Topic
Darabount rips Lucas over Indy IV script
Time
I agree with you Jumpman--Darabont was hired as a writer, he wrote a screenplay and they didn't use it. Such is the life of a writer for mega-budget summer blockbusters. It is true that if Speilberg was excited to go and shoot that script right on the spot that Lucas probably should trust his director but ultimately it boils down to Darabont not being used to the process of writing. For him, he is simply used to getting his way for his projects because he is a pretty powerful guy that is usually allowed creative freedom to have his way. The same is assuredly true of Lucas as well, but its merely a clash of egos and Lucas is the one that hired him--if he says no, then he says no. Producers hire and reject writers on a pretty regular basis for this type of thing.

This really has nothing to do with prequels or whether or not Lucas is still talented. He is the executive producer, he is the one doing the hiring and firing and if an executive producer wants something changed--whether it is Lucas or anyone else--usually they win because they are one calling the shots.
Post
#283937
Topic
Splinter Of The Mind's Eye - review and thoughts.
Time
Originally posted by: Anchorhead
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
Interesting aspect, though, that anybody can simply say, "Shut down," to a droid. One, I would think that a droid would only obey his master's directive to do that.


In fact, Vader tells Luke that's why they obeyed him, because he had just become their new owner.



Funny, when I first read it, I thought to myself - that's where Lucas probably came up with the idea to further shrink the universe in TPM. Honestly, he doesn't seem to ever have an original thought in his head. Everything he's ever "created" has really just been borrowed and tweaked from someone else's work - Star Wars Origins


In Lucas' notes from the mid-70's C3P0 is destroyed but then re-assembled by a little boy working in a factory. So it was an idea that he had always been partial to.

Post
#283886
Topic
Splinter Of The Mind's Eye - review and thoughts.
Time
Originally posted by: Guy Caballero
Actually, George Lucas wrote a NEW introduction to it when it was reprinted in the 90s. It'll be back in print with a fancy new cover this year I bet.
It would be interesting if Foster wrote a retro-style sequel about what Han and Chewie were up to at the same time.


Yeah thats the one i read, its from 1994. And he says that the star wars series is nine films long!! Oops George! Bet this won't be included in a new edition.
Post
#283835
Topic
Splinter Of The Mind's Eye - review and thoughts.
Time
Yeah, it sure does contain elements from previous and future scripts. Also, the section where Luke recruits the alien natives by defeating one in a fight is taken from the 1974 rough draft, and the plot-propeller of the Kaiburr crustal is from the early drafts as well. Aside from that, Lucas basically just used the plot base of Raiders of the Lost Ark for the story, as you mentioned.
Post
#283551
Topic
Darabount rips Lucas over Indy IV script
Time
Darabont has been harping this for a while now. It seems to be a bit of a clash of ego's personally but i just don't see the importance of Lucas. If Speilberg was ecstatic and said it was the best script he had read since Raiders--i mean come on!--then why hold back? What ever happened to directors have complete creative control, as the Lucas mantra goes? I guess that only applies when its him in the directors chair.

And yeah, the darabont quotes in my book come from 2000. At that time he was top in the running for co-writing Attack of the Clones, and then he was in talks to develop Indy 4. I don't think he was simply sucking up though, but i do think he is being a bit harsh on Lucas now, seeing as things like that happen all the time. Its refreshing to see someone calling him on a bad choice though.
Post
#283546
Topic
Darabount rips Lucas over Indy IV script
Time
What i don't understand is:

If Paramount is paying for the movie...
If Frank Darabont was writing the screenplay...
If Steven Speilberg is directing it

Then what is the big deal about Lucas anyway? I don't even think he is the producer, just executive producer, someone else will be actually managing the daily production chores. Lucas' importance just seems arbitrary. So much for directors having complete artistic control, eh George?
Post
#283545
Topic
Star Wars Insider - R.I.P.
Time
Yup. I used to buy almost every issue between 1995 and 2000. Then i started noticing a quality drop and i would only buy an occassional issue...the last one i bought was the Raiders of the Lost Ark 20th anniversary special in 2001. That tells you something.

The mag used to be run by the fan club, and that was it rocked between 1995 and 2000. The columns were in-depth and informative, and they were intelligent and entertaining. Back then, without the internet, it was also a good source of news and its jawa trader catalog always made me drool, and of course with the exclusive prequel production reports were great, and then there was stuff like Anthony Daniels' Wonder Column. Its now become basically a big Lucasfilm advertisement magazine, which is a worst case scenario--being a mag financed by the very product it is promoting, it somehow rose above the whole promotional trap for all those years but lately its only been consisting of video game previews, a few cool pictures, advertisements and little blurbs taken from the official site. It could improve i suppose, sometimes publishers need an issue or two to find their groove, but personally it would take a lot to sway me back, and they can only re-interview the same cast and crew members so many times.
Post
#282732
Topic
Anyone else totally disregard Leia being Luke's sister?
Time
The Leia things works a bit better in the Saga too. In the OT all of a sudden at the end of the trilogy "btw, Leia is your sister" and then it has no bearing on the rest of the plot. But in the saga its at least set up in Episode III and you are aware of it all through ANH and ESB so when it crops up in ROTJ its fulfilling something already established. It still goes nowhere but at least there isn't that "WTF??" quality attached to it.
Post
#282709
Topic
Anyone else totally disregard Leia being Luke's sister?
Time
It more has to do with an ingrained perception of the original intent of the film, Weyseed. The films were not supposed to be connected the way they are now, and to someone who grew watching them under the perspective originally intended and presented, accepting subsequent ret-cons being forced into the original material in ways that clearly weren't intended is so distracting that it simply cannot be accepted. Like if Lucas made an Episode VII where it was revealed that all along Han was really Luke's brother and Boba Fett was real Emperor while Palpatine was the decoy. You'd be like "huh?"--but all the pieces would fit, right?
Post
#282649
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Dude, calm down. Nobody ever said anything about throwing out old 35mm movies. You are absurd for even mentioning it. You said HD sucks, Cassidy said that a consensus of cinematographers felt that HD was not as bad as people make it out to be, and in fact very comparable to 35mm quality wise. Fair enough. You don't have to agree with that, I myself was shocked because I always heard the contrary. Of course as technology gets better HD will look better. 35mm has been around for a long time, it is silly to believe that someday some new technology wont replace it, but it is even sillier to say that because it gets replaced that everything ever filmed on 35mm must go too.

A hint of advice, sit back and enjoy the movie with your friends. Like you said it just annoys the crap out of them when you pick it apart like that.



No DP ever would willingly shoot in HD. They do it because it is cheaper. Any cinematographe who said that HD is comparable to 35mm should be striken of that title.
Post
#282574
Topic
Anyone else totally disregard Leia being Luke's sister?
Time
Originally posted by: CO
Zombie, I still will say that alot of OT fans went with the changes from 77-83, cause all of my friends saw SW in '77, and we all knew by '83 that Luke/Leia/Vader family affair was changed, but the movies were so good, you kinda went with the story. And I think that is what alot of people miss, if the quality is good, I am willing to change my views towards the movies.

I loved ESB, but the Vader/Luke angle came out of nowhere, and the series seemed to get away from the macro aspect of ANH, to a more personal story in ESB with Luke/Vader, and that finally all came to head in 1983. I will be honest, I am one of the few who don't love Vader/Luke revelation, as I think it created just as many fans as it turned off, but ESB is damn good of a movie, I accepted the story. For me personaly, ESB is the only sequel besides Godfather II that is just as good as the original, and that to me is a real achievement to have movie magic in 2 movies from the same series.

I think SW will always live on with kids as we get older, cause I see my nephews and their friends enjoy the movies now, but the difference is when they get older they are going to discover the quality issues we discovered too. It is very easy for a kid to fall in love with a lightsaber or the millenium falcon, hell I did it back in 1977, but it is another thing for those same fans to still love those movies 10-15 years later, and that is where the PT/Saga fans will become a true niche fanbase, once the PT generation grows up.

I always use ROTJ as my analogy to the PT kids who love the movies now. I loved ROTJ as a kid in 1983, I thought it was better then ESB, but once I hit highschool and plopped in the trilogy on VHS around 1990-91, all of the sudden as an adult you understand what are the better movies, and ROTJ was just OK only cause it was SW. Now think of the PT, and times that by 3 movies, do you think kids in their 20's aren't going to notice Jake Lloyd & Jar Jar in TPM? The AOTC romance with Padme/Anakin? The ridiculous events that eventually lead to Anakin turning in ROTS? This is all stuff they will notice as they get older, just as I noticed as I got older that the Ewoks are kiddy, Jabbas Palace goes on too long, and the kiddification of SW actually began in 1983.

Trust me guys, quality always rules out in the end.


I have to say, I am not as optimistic. We keep telling ourselves this to make us feel better but evidence seems to suggest otherwise. A cursory glance at the opinions of the mainstream younger fans reveals a nearly complete allegiance to the PT/SE/Saga version of the franchise. Places like this give us sanctuary on the internet--but i mean, why do you think, for instance, The Bashers Sanctuary was closed on TFN? Yes, its because TFN is blatantly pro-LFL--but this is ignorning the larger issue. The larger issue is, why is TFN blatantly pro-LFL? Because they represent the largest mass of Star Wars fans on the internet, and one that is predominantly under 30. I hate to say it, but we are a marginalised speciality group in terms of the fandom, and we are shrinking by the year.

Most of us were introduced to the saga by the OOT, we grew up on the films before the PT and some of us were even around to see them in theaters. We were influenced by the guidance and by the community of people that had the same experience as us. But we are dissapearing. Why do you think that each year the OOT dies a little more? We are getting older and moving away. In 1996 everyone on the net had grown up with the films and at least half had seen them in theaters. In 2001, most of the people had grown up with the original films and some had seen them in theaters. In 2005, some of us had grown up with the original films and a few of us had seen them in theaters. By 2012, a few of us will have grown up with the originals and I will be surprised to see anyone that had seen them in their original run. Its a confirmed fact--look at the age brackt of those individuals: these are mainly in the 35 year old range and represent the people who saw the original when they were four or five. But what happened to the millions who saw them when they were ten and twelve? What happened to the millions who saw them when they were eighteen and twenty? The answer is that they are all in their fifties now and don't belong to the fandom anymore--they continue watching the OOT and have moved on in their life. The sad fact is that the same thing will happen to us. In fifteen years the fandom will be exclusively populated with people who grew up on the PT, and the few old farts like us that are floating around will be such a minority that our opions will not matter or be visible--like all those millions that only like SW 77. Where the hell are all those people now? Anchorhead may literally be the last one around. But OT and Saga fans marginalised that fanbase, pushed them out and now basically no one views the series as just SW 77 anymore.

Star Wars will always be remembered but it will only be with film scholars. They will look at it as a monumental piece of cinema, and some of the more educated fans will appreciate it for that status and will attempt to view it as a historic stand-alone film that gave birth to the saga--but very few, if any, will just watch the OT. Especially since they will see the saga in order and the OT will look like an inconsistent piece of crap (which i have to agree with--when watching it from the PT perspective its not really possible to "get" the OT in such a way that will harbor allegiance).

With regards to quality, you are also right in a way--the quality will determine things. In this case, the PT will be liked but not super-devoted to the way the OOT was with us. You won't have such passionate fans as you did in the 80's because the films aren't really that enjoyable to provoke such devotion. But, like every blockbuster franchise, their will be fans but they will be mostly casual and moderately-hardcore in nature. The other faction will be super-sci-fi nerds that wank off on the parallels to Faust and Hamlet, and the Saga will become a super-specialised niche fandom of nerds and adolescants who haven't yet realised that the films arent great.

Its sad, but i just can't help see it in those ways. Spending time here, and with likeminded OT fans gives you a warped perception of how things are progressing--i hate to say it, but the Starwars.com and theforce.net message boards are more typical of the state of the fandom in some ways. Lucas killed his greatest achievement.