logo Sign In

yhwx

User Group
Members
Join date
23-May-2016
Last activity
9-Jun-2023
Posts
6,256

Post History

Post
#985520
Topic
Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread
Time

SilverWook said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

You’re really using HansiG to support your argument after everything he pulled around here?

My point is status in a community should not matter.

Also, this should have never been in General Star Wars Discussion board. A move would be nice.

Post
#985475
Topic
Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread
Time

Dek Rollins said:

I’ve never understood why an image only post such as something like this

is against the rules, even though there is text in the image, when the in-image text is exactly the sentence they want to respond with. How is that any different than


DO IT!

or just simply

DO IT!

?

Obviously when a completely unrelated image only post is made it should be enforced upon, but in the case of that Hansi post, other than the idea that six gifs may have been much, I don’t see anything wrong with it, because he was directly responding to someone with the text in the images.

I think the main problem with that is intent. Even if you put in some UTF-8 text in there the intent is still an image-only post. I would argue that both cases are breaking the rules.

Also: It would be nice if a mod could move this thread to Off-Topic.

Post
#985467
Topic
Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

Feel free to report me.

Reported.

Post
#985465
Topic
Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread
Time

Tyrphanax said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

Well for one (if you’d actually read the rules):

  1. No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

I do read the rules. To prove it, here’s my browser history:

Also, I don’t really think that post should be allowed since the whole thread is off topic.

Post
#985457
Topic
Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

Post
#985447
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

Lord Haseo said:

yhwx said:

Lord Haseo said:

You mean wanting to fornicate with an actress/actor is fanfictiony? What?

Maybe you need a sampler of a lot of fan fiction.

Also all I said was mere speculation about if Poe and Rey were going to be a thing. I didn’t say anything about how they were going to fuck and under what pretenses the sex was going to be under.

I really hope that doesn’t become of thing. Rey should just be Rey.

Just because Luke didn’t end up with anyone in the OT doesn’t mean Rey has to follow suit. Her character shouldn’t hinge on being in a relationship; a romantic relationship should add to her character.

My comment had nothing to do with Luke. I also think that here having a romantic relationship would be out of place, considering how Rey is fiercely independent, to a fault.

Post
#985441
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

Lord Haseo said:

You mean wanting to fornicate with an actress/actor is fanfictiony? What?

Maybe you need a sampler of a lot of fan fiction.

Also all I said was mere speculation about if Poe and Rey were going to be a thing. I didn’t say anything about how they were going to fuck and under what pretenses the sex was going to be under.

I really hope that doesn’t become of thing. Rey should just be Rey.

Post
#985397
Topic
Star wars 40th anniversary
Time

generalfrevious said:

Darth Id said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

CatBus said:

TV’s Frink said:

I’ll take the 42nd Anniversary Thread for two reasons.

Someone start a thread to guess what those two reasons are.

I’m hoping if you take back this request, you can make the resulting thread unhappen.

These things only go in one direction.

Reason #42 you’ll never be a moderator.

Number 1 is that I’d never accept such an offer.

I should have said “Reason #42 you’ll never be offered the position of moderator.”

There ya go.

Well that’s tidy, isn’t it? Flunk admitted WHSHS without wxyx even having to say “WYSHS.” You guys are like Shinji at full bio-sync with Eva-One.

Nothing you just said makes any sense.

Same with all Id posts.

That would be his user title.