yhwx

Nerflix still sells DVDs‽

I’m now getting Haeso’s new avatar confused with BrightestDayFan’s all the time now.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

David Lynch’s films are simply awful. Nevertheless, he is a genius. Not in terms of film making but in terms of being able to convince so many idiots that his crap films are something special.

Just because you don’t like films that other people do doesn’t mean you should call them idiots. Grow up man.

You do not simply tell ImperialScum to grow up

moviefreakedmind said:

Smithers said:

imperialscum said:

David Lynch’s films are simply awful. Nevertheless, he is a genius. Not in terms of film making but in terms of being able to convince so many idiots that his crap films are something special.

“Don’t embarrass yourself”

But seriously I’d assumed an “intellect” such as yourself could at least understand Lynch’s filmmaking.

Lol, intellect.

Almost all of the antonyms of intellect apply to ImpScum.

imperialscum said:

Well it is because I understand them…

Prove it.

A Random Crap

1,031

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

Tyrphanax said:

I mean they moved their IP to Ireland to escape American business tax laws, said they’d never move back unless we dropped our corporate tax to some ridiculously low rate, and now they’re saying that they don’t have to pay Ireland because their country isn’t Irish.

Pretty straightforward.

What about the part where Windows is to blame?

HOW ABOUT THAT, MR. FUNG?!?!

Fung you.

Mediocre addition to an already mediocre joke.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Tyrphanax said:

I bet Apple is wishing they had a back button to press so they wouldn’t have to pay Ireland 13 billion Euros for blatant and admitted tax evasion.

It’s complicated.

Probably. Not sure, though.

This post is disappointing to me.

I just think that there’s probably more to it than it seems at face value.

Tyrphanax said:

I bet Apple is wishing they had a back button to press so they wouldn’t have to pay Ireland 13 billion Euros for blatant and admitted tax evasion.

It’s complicated.

Probably. Not sure, though.

TV’s Frink said:

Agreed…but why are you linking to anything with “Spoilers”?

Good point.

I figured out a better way to hide spoilers:

Spoilers

It’s all Jar Jar’s fault.

(Quote to see syntax)

thejediknighthusezni said:

This all stems from the refusal, in the face of every imperative, to toss out EVERYTHING received from the Catholic abomination. Scripture must be approached as if for the first time and with a determination to accept what is there. There must also be a determination to resolve any apparent contradiction with Logic, Common Sense, and natural True Law.

Your favorite team has reached the Super Bowl. The opposing team has a record of placing bounties and violating rules to injure the stars of your team. You can go into the stadium with the hope that there will be none of that nastiness and that the rival team will sincerely repent of the error of their ways. At the same time, You can be OUTRAGED and utterly disgusted by the attitude and practices of that gang of thugs. You can resolve to shout and do any other Lawful thing to stop the goons and encourage the officials to uphold the rules.

Christians are commanded to pray for the leaders and peoples who might cause them troubles that there can be peace. They are to do so without anger and contentiousness. At the same time, Christians are commanded, through Scripture and Natural Law, to be horrified by and oppose evil and hurtfulness with constant judgement and the courage to undertake any necessary action That is ordained by our Creator through Scripture and Natural Law to stop cruelty.

Where the HHHHHYYYYYYYEEEEEELLLLLLL is the contradiction?!?!?

I pray EVERY DAY, and sometimes several times a day, that our indescribably CRUEL and DEPRAVED elite will be moved by our Creator or anyone and anything else to clap themselves on the forehead and say “Gee, we really need to knock off this INSANITY” Praying that others will repent and rejoin humanity cannot be experienced with anger and contentiousness. They are mutually exclusive emotional states.

O…T…O…H, when not in earnest prayer for peace, I certainly can feel FURIOUS OUTRAGE and UTTER DISGUST for those enlightened ones and their designs. I certainly can find the COWARDICE and CORRUPTION of their willing tools and shills UTTERLY VOMITOUS and HORRIFYING. I certainly can call upon our LORD to uphold his Word of Honor and provide a full measure of Justice to the unrelenting and the cowardly. I certainly can call upon any other person and power to take every ordained action. I certainly can keep myself from being a HYPOCRITE.

Our reactions must be commensurate with the degree of evil faced. This business of handing over our children to the will of HEINOUS MONSTERS because we “can’t be judgmental” and laying the heads of our sisters and brothers on the chopping block because we “must not be contentious” is it’s own form of INCALCULABLE DEPRAVITY.

No.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

Alzheimer’s disease.

Bummer.

Yep. Lost a grandfather to it. Not looking forward to my own old age, to be honest.

Don’t be so pessimistic. We could have solved these problems by the time you get to old age

Too late for me!

Over 65, Frink. Over 65.

Prove I’m not.

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early-onset_Alzheimer's_disease

Well I guess you’re done.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

Alzheimer’s disease.

Bummer.

Yep. Lost a grandfather to it. Not looking forward to my own old age, to be honest.

Don’t be so pessimistic. We could have solved these problems by the time you get to old age

Too late for me!

Over 65, Frink. Over 65.

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

Alzheimer’s disease.

Bummer.

Yep. Lost a grandfather to it. Not looking forward to my own old age, to be honest.

Don’t be so pessimistic. We could have solved these problems by the time you get to old age, so keep your hopes up.

I like postimg.org.

Tobar said:

yhwx said:
Don’t forum and drive.

Don’t tell me how to live my life! #UNSTOPPABLE

Heh.

But seriously, if you did take that attitude, you would have no life to live. So it’s moot.

suspiciouscoffee said:

yhwx said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Blasting SW music as I drive down the interstate is fun.

Don’t forum and drive.

Obviously, I’m not driving now.

Good.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

DominicCobb said:

I’m confused, are you referring to a specific app that doesn’t have a back button or do you literally want the iPad itself to have a back button?

I literally want a back button on the iPad.

The YouTube app on iOS is a perfect example. Half the time the back button is not available, or at least not immediately obvious, so when I want to go back to the list of videos from a currently playing video, it’s either not possible or a pain in the ass. On Android all I have to do is hit the back button on the phone.

That’s the YouTube app’s fault for not understanding standard iOS conventions.

You’re missing the point. On Android it doesn’t matter.

I guess I have to take back my declaration of the end of the conversation.

Even if it doesn’t matter on Android, the system on Android is broken.

What?

I’ve said the reason before. I’ll even quote it here, so that you don’t have to do any dreadful work:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

The fact that the iPad does not have a back button is the stupidest thing ever.

The back button has a fundamental flaw: You don’t know what you’re going back to. It could be anything. That’s user hostile behavior.

The way iOS handles this is better, and gives more clarity. You understand exactly what’s going on when you click a back button. That’s better for the user, and avoids confusion. If a user is constantly confused by a paradigm, they’re more likely to stop using it.

suspiciouscoffee said:

Blasting SW music as I drive down the interstate is fun.

Don’t forum and drive.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

DominicCobb said:

I’m confused, are you referring to a specific app that doesn’t have a back button or do you literally want the iPad itself to have a back button?

I literally want a back button on the iPad.

The YouTube app on iOS is a perfect example. Half the time the back button is not available, or at least not immediately obvious, so when I want to go back to the list of videos from a currently playing video, it’s either not possible or a pain in the ass. On Android all I have to do is hit the back button on the phone.

That’s the YouTube app’s fault for not understanding standard iOS conventions.

You’re missing the point. On Android it doesn’t matter.

I guess I have to take back my declaration of the end of the conversation.

Even if it doesn’t matter on Android, the system on Android is broken.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

The lack of a back button is really dumb.

I’m stoping the conversation if you’re going to be like this.

I win!

You can see it that way if you want to.

I think everyone but you would be happy to see the conversation to end this quickly.

I’m happy as well.

The conversation was stupid in the first place.

TV’s Frink said:

DominicCobb said:

I’m confused, are you referring to a specific app that doesn’t have a back button or do you literally want the iPad itself to have a back button?

I literally want a back button on the iPad.

The YouTube app on iOS is a perfect example. Half the time the back button is not available, or at least not immediately obvious, so when I want to go back to the list of videos from a currently playing video, it’s either not possible or a pain in the ass. On Android all I have to do is hit the back button on the phone.

That’s the YouTube app’s fault for not understanding standard iOS conventions.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

The lack of a back button is really dumb.

I’m stoping the conversation if you’re going to be like this.

I win!

You can see it that way if you want to.