cutnshut said:
We started off this subject trying to break ESB down into 3 acts - which we did, but Xhonzi and yourself are thinking of it in terms of the entire saga - where i was breaking it down as if it was the first sequel to Star wars,
I don't have a quote to back me up on this, but they knew they were doing at least 2 more when they did ESB. It's true, they didn't have RotJ exactly figured out, but that doesn't mean that they didn't put some long lead items in ESB on purpose. I think the Structure (which we were discussing) makes it self-evident that this was planned to be a 2nd Act in a 3 Act kind of thing. One of the things that makes ESB so great, in my less than humble opinion, is that it didn't feel the need to 'redo or outdo' the first movie, neither did it feel the need to cap off everything left open by the first movie. Like a 2nd Act, it was free to expand on the problem... but not solve it. Perhaps the audience was going in, expecting Star Wars 2, and that informed their assumption that the Rebels would get a happy ending... again... and that's why it might come as a shock when they lose bigtime there at the end.
which is the way it was written. Like you said - it seems clear now that George Lucas had no overall plan untill he made return of the jedi - I think this lack of focus for the overall story is evident in ESB -
many people were totally confused by vaders revelation to Luke, why were so many people confused after seeing it?
Were people confused? Or was it just the topic of nerd debates the world over?
Nowadays there are way too many sequels and the magic of the first 2 get kinda lost becuase of the way Lucas decided to continue the story - this alters your perspective when you watch these movies again.
Fair enough. I don't have memories of ESB without RotJ, so I can't comment there directly. But, as Gaffer did a better job explaining, I don't think I've made any comments that are of an "altered perspective" due to RotJ or the prequels, MTBIH.