- Post
- #221459
- Topic
- "Troy" Re-Cut (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/221459/action/topic#221459
- Time

wmgan
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 9-May-2006
- Last activity
- 7-May-2011
- Posts
- 282
Post History
- Post
- #221342
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/221342/action/topic#221342
- Time
- Post
- #220408
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/220408/action/topic#220408
- Time
Why don't you send me the torrent file for the DivX version, and I'll seed it. My e-mail address is ganwuiming@gmail.com .
- Post
- #220376
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/220376/action/topic#220376
- Time
- Post
- #218820
- Topic
- The Producers (2005) - Extended Edition (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/218820/action/topic#218820
- Time
I'll upload the SL version soon if anyone's interested.
- Post
- #218264
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/218264/action/topic#218264
- Time
- Post
- #217872
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/217872/action/topic#217872
- Time
- Post
- #217609
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/217609/action/topic#217609
- Time
- Post
- #216865
- Topic
- Lord of the Rings - FOTR - The Book-Cut (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216865/action/topic#216865
- Time
- Post
- #216863
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216863/action/topic#216863
- Time
- Post
- #216650
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216650/action/topic#216650
- Time
Originally posted by: caligulathegod
Hey, Wmgan. I sent you an email attached with a quick and dirty flaming sword effect. Let me know what you think.
Hey, Wmgan. I sent you an email attached with a quick and dirty flaming sword effect. Let me know what you think.
Whoa, that looks really sweet! I'll check out Particle Illusion -- it looks like I can achieve what I was going for. Thanks, Caligula!
- Post
- #216581
- Topic
- Idea: Lord Of The Rings trilogy edit...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216581/action/topic#216581
- Time
Originally posted by: Lord Phillock
Hey, I made a trilogy book-edit...
Hey, I made a trilogy book-edit...

And I do look forward to checking that out soon, though not right this moment. Meanwhile, Phillock, did you check out my abridged edit?
- Post
- #216580
- Topic
- How do you make good titles for a movie?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216580/action/topic#216580
- Time
- Post
- #216318
- Topic
- The Angel Chronicles (movie project idea) (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216318/action/topic#216318
- Time
- Post
- #216300
- Topic
- How do you make good titles for a movie?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216300/action/topic#216300
- Time
- Post
- #216276
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216276/action/topic#216276
- Time
- Post
- #216054
- Topic
- Idea: Lord Of The Rings trilogy edit...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216054/action/topic#216054
- Time
*** SPOILER ALERT for the LOTR musical ***
It's interesting to note that the Scouring of the Shire was in the stage musical in Toronto. Wormtongue was absent from this adaptation, so Saruman's henchman in this scene was Bill Ferney (who acted as his spy in Bree, like in the novel). I'm not sure how I feel about the inclusion of this scene -- I loved the fact that they had it, but looking at it objectively it might have been somewhat anti-climactic after all that had just happened (though I was upset at how weakly the destruction of the Ring was handled, such that there wasn't really much of a climax there either). You'd have to get an impartial viewer (i.e. someone who has never read the books nor seen the movies) to judge.
I'm also not sure how I feel about their decision to skip the seige of Gondor and battle at the Pellennor fields altogether and sort of merge that with the battle outside the Black Gate (and merge the Mouth of Sauron with the Witchking too; and yes, the Army of the Dead does fight at the Black Gate) -- if you've seen my abridged cut you'll know that I consider the battle at Helm's Deep far less important than the battle at Gondor, but it seems the playwrights felt the exact opposite. Oh well. Having Gandalf the White appear for the first time at Helm's Deep was an interesting decision that worked emotionally, but like lordjedi said, as with the movies, changes lead to other changes -- now that the three hunters have to arrive at Edoras without Gandalf, the catalyst for Theoden's awakening is -- guess what -- the shards of Narsil. Oh yeah -- Anduril wasn't forged until just before Aragorn goes to summon the Army of the Dead, like in the movies -- but since Aragorn had it with him all the while (how exactly does one fight while carrying the weight of a broken sword?!), how exactly does he get it forged? This is really puzzling -- if memory serves me rightly, after the victory at Helm's Deep (possibly after banishing Saruman), Gandalf presents the reforged blade to Aragorn, leaving me to wonder just when he had the time to reforge the sword.
The thing that really got on my nerves is this -- it's stated explicitly that when Gollum was held captive in Mordor, Sauron made him promise to find the Ring and give it to him (Sauron). He agrees to help Frodo because Frodo tells him that he will be free of his promise to Sauron if he helps Frodo. This is just wrong -- it changes his fixation on getting the Ring from actual addiction to the thing itself, to simply wanting to hold up his end of a bargain.
Shelob was simply stunning. The Khazad-Dum scene was a fantastic end to the first (of three) acts -- with the Balrog still hidden in shadow, smoke starts to fill not just the stage but the whole theater, and black confetti is blown into the audience, really drawing you into the scene. When the Balrog itself makes an appearance, to be honest, it's a little bit of a letdown (it looks basically like an enormous paper lantern), and Gandalf (or rather, the platform he's on) descends rather SLOWLY (soon FOLLOWED by the Balrog, who folds its wings and descends). I'm still puzzled over what the director intended by this -- if the intention was to have both Gandalf and the Balrog FALL, it was certainly far from convincing -- I'm more inclined to think that the scene represents the Balrog overcoming Gandalf before descending back into its fiery pit, though it's really unclear exactly what was supposed to have happened. The same with the destruction of the Ring -- Frodo and Gollum wrestle (Frodo doesn't put it on and disappear after claiming the Ring, or at least it wasn't depicted clearly), when Gollum manages to get the Ring, and (like in the book) jumps around shouting "My precious!", when he steps onto a platform that descends. Again, if he was supposed to be FALLING, it was the least convincing "fall" I've ever seen . . .
All in all, it's a very interesting take on LOTR and I recommend all fans to see it -- I know it got a lot of bad reviews, but I enjoyed it thorougly despite all its flaws, and I think that fans will be both its greatest supporters and detractors. It's a wonderful alternative visual interpretation to the movies (there were definitely elements that were influenced by the movies, but thankfully not too much).
- Post
- #216049
- Topic
- The Producers (2005) - Extended Edition (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216049/action/topic#216049
- Time
- Post
- #216048
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216048/action/topic#216048
- Time
Haha, "The Police Bay" -- that's hilarious!
I realized that there won't be a simple way to make a high-quality version without re-editing the whole thing from scratch -- I initially used 640x272 source files so I built my project using those dimensions, and Premiere doesn't allow the dimensions of a project to be changed -- if I substitute the XviD source with the original DVD files frameserved using AviSynth, I would have to resize it first, which would mean great loss of (especially) vertical resolution, which kinda defeats the purpose of using a HQ source anyway.
So . . . I shall redo it, but perhaps not right away. And hopefully I'll be able to get that d*mn flaming sword right.
- Post
- #215985
- Topic
- The Producers (2005) - Extended Edition (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215985/action/topic#215985
- Time
- Post
- #215595
- Topic
- The Phantom of the Opera Resynched (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215595/action/topic#215595
- Time
- Post
- #215392
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215392/action/topic#215392
- Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer TapeUgh, I remember my friend's ex-girlfriend once tried to argue the point with me because she thought that the Jabba scene was actually in the original cuts with only the original actor in there. And though my friend used to be a huge Star Wars nut, he wouldn't back me up!
Perhaps she read that scene in the original novelization and assumed it would also have been in the movie?
- Post
- #215382
- Topic
- The Producers (2005) - Extended Edition (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215382/action/topic#215382
- Time
***
THE PRODUCERS (2005): EXTENDED EDITION
With deleted scenes reintegrated by Wui-Ming Gan
"Under the right circumstances, a producer could make more money with a flop than he could with a hit!"
With 12 minutes of deleted footage reintegrated into the movie, this extended edition of The Producers is the closest thing to seeing the show live on Broadway. Experience the show-stopping number "King of Broadway" on screen, laugh as Will Ferrell hams it up in "In Old Bavaria", and bring back nostalgic memories of the original 1968 movie with a scene in the Astor Bar and vignettes in "Along Came Bialy".
RUNNING TIME: 147 minutes
LANGUAGE: English
VIDEO FORMAT: Anamorphic widescreen
AUDIO FORMAT: Dolby Digital 2.0
BONUS FEATURES:
Outtakes
Analysis of a Scene: "I Wanna Be a Producer"
Feature Commentary with Director Susan Stroman
To discuss this fan edit, please visit:
http://www.originaltrilogy.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=5463
DISCLAIMER:
This DVD is strictly NOT FOR SALE. You may obtain a copy of this fan edit only if you already own the official DVD release.
- Post
- #215381
- Topic
- The Producers (2005) - Extended Edition (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215381/action/topic#215381
- Time
Originally posted by: Klingon_Jedi
When Ulla is on the ladder painting, she's wearing an apron. When she's not on it, it's gone. It's extremly noticable.
When Ulla is on the ladder painting, she's wearing an apron. When she's not on it, it's gone. It's extremly noticable.
I don't know how I missed that -- it's painfully obvious once you drew my attention to it. In fact, the apron is on her only in the close-up shots -- when it cuts to a wide shot with her on the ladder, the apron is gone.
- Post
- #215299
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215299/action/topic#215299
- Time
Originally posted by: Hoth-Nudist
Ive never seen the end of ROTJ SE 2.0 and I never will. I feel its an insult and when I read about the changes mad back in '04 for the DVD's, I vomited with terror. George can keep that manure for I'll never spend a dime on it along with the PT. The OOT is all the story I need.
Ive never seen the end of ROTJ SE 2.0 and I never will. I feel its an insult and when I read about the changes mad back in '04 for the DVD's, I vomited with terror. George can keep that manure for I'll never spend a dime on it along with the PT. The OOT is all the story I need.
I'm always surprised when I hear such vehement reactions to the 2004 DVDs. Don't you think that most of the visual changes -- replacing the chimpanzee-eyed old lady with Ian McDarmid, the more realistic looking corridor, replacing the English (Basic?) words with an alien script, a much better-looking Jabba than in the 1997 SEs, etc. -- are improvements over the 1997 SEs? Okay, so replacing Sebastian with Hayden might not have been the best idea (though I'm perfectly fine with it), as is letting Greedo still shoot first (I don't know why so many reports say they now fire simultaneously -- it's pretty obvious to me that Greedo's shot comes earlier), but most of the changes made in the 2004 DVDs from the 1997 SEs are far less intrusive than the ones made in the 1997 SEs from the earlier versions.
EDIT: Aurebesh! I can't believe I forgot the name of that "alien script".