- Post
- #1250715
- Topic
- The OT.com Debate Club. No debates!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1250715/action/topic#1250715
- Time
Now this is debate-racing!
This user has been banned.
Now this is debate-racing!
It was probably about dahmaged.
I’d probably put everyone on my list just for the cat pics.
The posts he deleted were me pointing out your index needed updating because he was deleting threads. I deserved the first one because I added “lolololol.” The next two (and to be clear I didn’t realized he deleted the first one) were legitimate ones where he deleted some stuff but missed others. I think the subtopic and then the thread title. Once I realized my posts had all been deleted (and by the way he did make the edits I suggested), I PM’d him to ask why he deleted the posts. He left the topic.
FWIW I made a similar post in your SW index thread today, then thought better of it and deleted it myself. I also deleted several posts from today in the random thoughts thread where I complained about you referencing my PMs from when I returned from my ban, and also one about the posts that led up to that ban.
To one other of your points, I don’t believe constructive discussion with Jay is possible, and I don’t believe the remaining mods can do anything about it, so there’s no point in the PMs you suggest.
With that cleared up, I will stop derailing your thread. I’d rather not be banned again over all this.
(Deleted, not worth it)
There have actually been times where I’ve had multiple tabs open and I’ve posted what I meant to post to you into one of the public forums.
I’ve done that several times. Often when you see a “.” post from me.
(Deleted, not worth it)
(Deleted, not worth it)
(Deleted, not worth it)
Hey if you think I’m the one throwing a tantrum, as opposed to the guy who didn’t just lock threads, he deleted them from existence, and all because he couldn’t handle the fact that he broke the rules himself and we had the audacity to point it out…ok, have a good weekend too.
This is a sports thread mate - not comedy or fiction.
As stated above, if you actually wish to discuss it further with me send me a PM.
Cheers man.
A PM? So you can say this?
If you actually wish to discuss it further with me send me a PM (though given your last PM to me, your first since your return from a temp-ban for repeated derailing of threads, flaming/baiting, personal attacks etc… despite multiple requests, PMs, and warnings not to continue, and since further warning not to continue) - in which you attacked me, the mods and the site - I suggest you give more effort, consideration and thought into it if you wish to have an actual meaningful dialogue.
Shall we post the PM so everyone can see it, instead of just relying on your interpretation of events?
Kinda like your interpretation of the politics thread, which can’t be looked at because Jay deleted it. Gee I wonder why.
Someone once gave me good advice, which I too often ignore, which is to not engage people who consistently use bad faith arguments. That applies to former moderators in the same way it applies to site owners.
Oh by the way I sent Jay a PM asking why he was deleting my posts. Not only did he not respond, he left the topic. He also left the PM topic you referenced. So gee I wonder why there too.
Keep making up your own version of the truth if it makes you feel better. I’m done here.
Hey if you think I’m the one throwing a tantrum, as opposed to the guy who didn’t just lock threads, he deleted them from existence, and all because he couldn’t handle the fact that he broke the rules himself and we had the audacity to point it out…ok, have a good weekend too.
^ birth certificate = bureaucratic function = politics. Banned. Nice knowing you dahmage.
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
Social commentary on Millennials. Nice knowing you too.
Collipso has it pretty much right.
I’m not sure how that would be Jason’s take as well. He just hates when a post is not 100% absolutely laser focused on the OP topic for every letter of that post.
If you don’t like someone’s debating style, then forbid everyone from even debating that topic.
Best. Debate. Rule. EVER.
Second best. Best rule is if you don’t like someone’s debating style, you both forbid everyone from debating the topic AND nuke the topic from orbit so everyone instantly forgets there ever was a topic in the first place.
Ok.
“Nothing will change unless you talk about it” is ironic in light of recent events.
OP is cool with it though.
You can’t spell class without braying.
Recreational marihuana is now legal in Kanata.
I, for one, couldn’t care less.
Kanata? Where is that? I’ve never heard of Kanata before.
marihuana isn’t a thing either. DE was being phonetically artistic. the country is actually “Canada”
Okay so I don’t know anything about Canada.
In my defense, no one does.
Take it to the new thread.
Sums up the thread though.
^
Wow, you really added a whole lot to the conversation.
Are you just braying right now?
How I feel today.
ALLOL
YES.
But it’s at the end of the OP…
?
OP still says updated Oct 15th despite being updated today.
I assumed it was part of the OP text body but when I quote it that part is not included.
Oddly, in this similar thread the date is part of the OP text body.
https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/An-Index-Thread-for-General-Star-Wars-Discussion-/id/57363