logo Sign In

twooffour

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
8-Jan-2011
Last activity
8-Oct-2011
Posts
1,665

Post History

Post
#514607
Topic
Is Part 4 of anything ever good??
Time

CP3S said:

twooffour said:

*Fap*

*fap*

*fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap*

*fap* *fap* *fap*

*fap*

*fap* *fap*

*fap*

 

Ahhhhhhh.

 



You know, you're losing your edge.

Prior to this, you've at least managed to come off as a genuine dunce.
Nowadays, you just quote others' posts and replace everything with "fap fap".

Nice seeing what lame trolls have to resort to after they've accidentally blown their cover... first "no no no, that wasn't stupid, but I was still trolling!", then after being told how stupid it really was... "oh jeez... fap fap fap".
I think you've now become my least favorite person on this board!

Post
#514566
Topic
Is Part 4 of anything ever good??
Time

 

No. The things I have been saying haven't been stupid.



They have.

For example, when you accused me of redefining dictionaries without having first read my posts (lol), while I clearly hadn't (lol). Now, just in your last responsey, you did exactly this same thing yourself (lol). And now, you convenietly forget to address that (lol).

So I guess the stupid things you posted, were genuinely stupid. Well, thanks for being so honest. I've tried.

All I did was make a few responses to your posts in order to encourage you



So you were trolling, as said above. Thanks for the confirmation.


to keep on writing semi-amusing long-ass posts about how right you are.



In relation to stupid, substance-less troll posts. Yea, awesome achievement there.


The only real irony in all of this is that most of my fellow off topic members would agree that everything you have been constantly accusing me of doing for the past few days, describe your own posting habits perfectly.



It's an irony I'm perfectly aware of. I like being blunt and condescending when I want (and most of it is more or less tongue-in-cheek, anyway), but I don't remember myself getting all "rubbed the wrong way" by others doing so. I kinda don't care.

The question is, whether YOU are aware of the irony produced by you accusing me of being a "condescending asshole", while HAVING STARTED THIS WHOLE DEBACLE by being a... condescending asshole.



 

Anyway, there is a whole thread dedicated to giving you those examples you were looking for.



Really? Like, example of where I'm stating a taste as a well-founded view, and a well-founded view as a proven view? Lol, no.

3-4 of those examples were pure jokes (as I've said before - congrats on skipping), a half is semi-humorous, and the rest is me being honest about some really stupid statements.

Sorry, a few out-of-context laconic one-liners won't do it.
Almost none of those quotes even qualify as an "opinion" or "factual statement" - they just consist of snippets from which you can't tell in any way, shape, or form, what the discussion had been about in the first place.

FYI, in order to provide examples of someone stating their opinion as fact, the least you need would be... an example containing the alledged opinion.

You fail, SO, DAMN, HARD.


(including the accusation that you think your opinions are facts)


Lol. Any insult aimed at your intelligence, feel free to picture now. Because they'd all be completely accurate.

 

Post
#514503
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

BloodnoseThePirate said:

I just watched 'Robocop' for the first time. I always made the assumption that it was cheesy solely based on the costume. But it was freakin awesome. The first 10 minutes and the last 20 worked the best for me. I don't like completely invincible characters. no suspense. But I was pleasantly surprised that I wasn't laughing at its ridiculousness the whole movie like I thought I would. 

7/10 balls.

Heh, I've only seen the beginning and the end so far, but I can totally see that :)
Also thought it would be some dated B-movie with a robot in a silly costume saying cheesy one-liners, or something. But damn, that shit's intense!

Post
#514501
Topic
Is Part 4 of anything ever good??
Time

 

To be honest, I am not even really sure what I am suppose to be giving examples of.



It's of me stating opinions as facts, as seen in your next quotation:
"basically started with someone (RedFive) accusing me of "stating my opinions as facts"

RIGHT AFTER that part you quoted, I say:
"So don't bother with the examples that might justify you derailing this thread for 3 pages."

And honestly, after being told explicitely what you should be providing examples of, MULTIPLE TIMES, as, for instance, from this rather short post:

3) So where are the examples?
Alternatively, would you say that your accusations of me stating my "opinions" as "facts", were just your opinion, and an unfounded one at that?


you must be either trolling, or be incredibly, incredibly dumb.


Beyond skimming them for amusing quotes, I haven't really been reading any of your posts, just enough so I'd be able to make responses to egg you on in a behinds the scene conspiracy to build the perfect twooffour quote archive of all time.



Ah, so it's trolling, then! (Insult averted, Moth3r; I haven't called anyone a dunce this time!)

So basically, you've been saying intentionally stupid things, intentionally misrepresenting my posts (as intentionally as it gets when you aren't reading them, that is), in order to elicit "arrogant" posts from me like "you're wrong"?

I honestly don't give a crap about being trolled, but I sure do hope you at least realize the huge irony of that.
Though I have the horrible feeling that you don't.



and being so much more intelligent than everyone else



Like, for instance, a troll who says intentionally stupid things (but maybe couldn't do better than that even if he tried)?

What it feels like like... well, I'd say quite normal.




The fun thing "about" OPINIONS is they don't fucking have to be backed up by anything. They are "opinions" for a reason.



So this might be the first time someone here actually challenged a well-established definition supported by dictionaries, and the perpetrator is you.
Ain't that hilarious.

All I can say is, you either severely lack understanding of what an "opinion" is, or rather, the things this term can mean, or you're trolling.

Oh wait, my bad. Heh.
I hope you weren't serious with that one?



Interestingly enough, I seriously really don't even know what you are looking for examples of at this point. I'm sure I'd be willing to give them to you, but I am not really up for wading through your endless posts to figure out what I am meant to be giving examples of.



Heh...





And I feel really guilty about trolling



Fixed. Bye.


 

Post
#514491
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

CP3S said:

TV's Frink said:

By the way, I apologized to Mrebo privately for what I helped do to this thread, but I'd like to do it publicly now as well.

Sorry, man.  It's just so hard to stop!

Yeah, I guess your right, Fink. We probably should have kept our fun confined to twooffour's thread. Not that it was really worth much when you couldn't even discuss the topic thanks to a constant barrage of things like "NO, WRONG" and other such trolling in response to every post. 

Anyway, yes, sorry Mrebo. This will be my last off-topic post in this thread.

 

Well, so much for the examples then, eh?

I guess that's alright, as the off-topic derailment of this thread basically started with someone (RedFive) accusing me of "stating my opinions as facts" (first with a quote list, then with that graphic).

So don't bother with the examples that might justify you derailing this thread for 3 pages.
Just pop in to drop a few snarky remarks and OPINIONS not backed up by examples, then quickly bow out when you're cornered. Not after a few times of pretending like you didn't know what I'm talking about, though... like "what, this topic was about remakes, but then RedFive posted something, just what was it? please help me out!".
Just don't forget to apologize after none of that worked, I'm sure Mrebo of all won't mind. :)

Post
#514484
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

CP3S said:

and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.


Yea, man, cut it out, please.
People generally prefer lighthearted, humorous fellahs over condescending assholes.

Ha!  Best one yet!

So why doesn't CP stop being one? I'd like him much more if he was a lighthearted fellah!

You really don't see the irony in you calling someone else a condescending asshole?  Or you just don't care?

And there you are, after an epic sarcasm joke fail, and 3 "fixes" pointing this out (in vain), asking me this question. It's just unbelievable. What's the maximum density of the universe? Have we reached it yet? I'd have to go ask a physicist, as we sure are pretty damn close.

Yea, I do very much hope that I see the irony in that, wouldn't be fucking intentional otherwise, now would it?


(Someone on here gave me an advice not to break down a joke immediately after someone didn't get it. Maybe try to respond with another.

This, ladies and gentleman, is why that was a bad idea.)


EDIT:
The question you should be asking yourself is, who else sees the irony in a guy who started off an internet quarrel with a condescending post (being upset at a humorously, quasi-condescending joke), sarcastically pretending to be a condescending asshole while actually meaning someone else (the one the original condescending post was aimed at)?

Ok, who sees two levels if irony there? Who sees three? Who sees more? How many does it take to annihilate all existence?
Now that'd be an interesting discussion, and seeing how things are atm, a rather pertinent one.

Post
#514479
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

CP3S said:

and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.


Yea, man, cut it out, please.
People generally prefer lighthearted, humorous fellahs over condescending assholes.

Ha!  Best one yet!

So why doesn't CP stop being one? I'd like him much more if he was a lighthearted fellah!

Post
#514464
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

doubleKO said:

twooffour said:

CP3S said:

twooffour said:


Nah, all kidding aside - it probably would, had it also been tongue-in-cheek, and not so damn self-serious.

Nah, all kidding aside - it really wouldn't. But you're right, I need to stop being so serious and picking fights and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.

You probably should, and I'm glad you've finally realized that you were the one who picked this fight. Cut it out in the future, will ya?

While you're at it, you should also learn to stop tossing accusations at other people when you're unable to define, or back them up; 'cause that's really bad.

Feigning sarcasm joke fail.

Fix nr.3... yea, that's it.

Gee Frink, of all the splendid variants you could've picked... why did you have to go with THAT one?

Post
#514463
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

CP3S said:

and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.


Yea, man, cut it out, please.
People generally prefer lighthearted, humorous fellahs over condescending assholes.

"Between you and me, you do tend to say a bunch of dumb shit, so I wouldn't have been surprised if you were calling the PT predecessors to Star Wars."

So hopefully after your personality change, we won't have to read more things like this:

If your going to try to be funny by making yourself sound like an idiot, at least use a little bit more hyperbole;

Question:
What do humor experts, oh wait, "humor experts", and you, have in common?
A: Nothing whatsoever.


by exaggerating the stupidity of your comments it will become more obvious that you are making an effort to be a dolt in the name of humor, rather than just appearing to be someone who has never seen a dictionary.

So we'll see you on the side, then!
Good luck, man.

PS: It's nice that, after all the projections, you've finally admitted to your small stature. Maybe, over time, all the jokes aimed at your size slowly desentized you to humor, and gave you the aching desire to come off as more deserving of respect, or shall I say, serious, to other people?

It's okay, CP, it's fine to be small, no one worthy of your attention will judge you for that. So no reason to act so condescending all the time, and it's alright to take a stupid joke and just move on.

If it consoles you, there is no need for anyone to use a CT scan to detect your presence - a fine, modest telescope aimed at the top of that mountain will probably suffice.

Now, wow, that wasn't that bad, now was it! It also didn't rub you the wrong way, right?
See, you're already making pr-, ahhh fuck it.

Post
#514461
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

doubleKO said:

twooffour said:

CP3S said:

twooffour said:


Nah, all kidding aside - it probably would, had it also been tongue-in-cheek, and not so damn self-serious.

Nah, all kidding aside - it really wouldn't. But you're right, I need to stop being so serious and picking fights and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.

You probably should, and I'm glad you've finally realized that you were the one who picked this fight. Cut it out in the future, will ya?

While you're at it, you should also learn to stop tossing accusations at other people when you're unable to define, or back them up; 'cause that's really bad.

Meta non-recognition of sarcasm joke fail.

Fix No.2... there's always another way!

Post
#514458
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

doubleKO said:

twooffour said:

CP3S said:

twooffour said:


Nah, all kidding aside - it probably would, had it also been tongue-in-cheek, and not so damn self-serious.

Nah, all kidding aside - it really wouldn't. But you're right, I need to stop being so serious and picking fights and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.

You probably should, and I'm glad you've finally realized that you were the one who picked this fight. Cut it out in the future, will ya?

While you're at it, you should also learn to stop tossing accusations at other people when you're unable to define, or back them up; 'cause that's really bad.

Feigning non-recognition of sarcasm joke

Fixed.

Post
#514457
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

CP3S said:

twooffour said:

I'm waiting for examples. :D

Yay! Now instead of fighting the dictionary, you are embracing it. I am proud of you! Trying A "little" too HARD, "perhaps", but I am STILL proud OF you "none-the-less".

So I've got three questions for you, would be glad if you answered all of them, thx:
1) Why do you put random words in quotation marks? Words are put in quotation marks if they're referring to a quote, to distance oneself from the expression, or as a form of ironic emphasis.
You just seem to put them wherever you want. So why you're doing that?

On a related note, why do you also use Christopher Walken caps?

2) When you say "now instead of fighting the dictionary", do you say "now", with the clear implication that I've ever fought the dictionary in the first place, on purpose, or are you really too dense/proud to get that THERE WAS NEVER ANY FIGHTING OF DICTIONARIES IN THE FIRST PLACE?

3) So where are the examples?
Alternatively, would you say that your accusations of me stating my "opinions" as "facts", were just your opinion, and an unfounded one at that?

Post
#514452
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

CP3S said:

twooffour said:


Nah, all kidding aside - it probably would, had it also been tongue-in-cheek, and not so damn self-serious.

Nah, all kidding aside - it really wouldn't. But you're right, I need to stop being so serious and picking fights and being a consistent condescending asshole to everyone in order to make up for my feelings of inadequacy regarding my small stature. 

I really just need to cut it the fuck out.

You probably should, and I'm glad you've finally realized that you were the one who picked this fight. Cut it out in the future, will ya?

While you're at it, you should also learn to stop tossing accusations at other people when you're unable to define, or back them up; 'cause that's really bad.

Post
#514450
Topic
When Remakes are a Bad Idea
Time

So for those others who don't catch up pretty quick, here's the first thing I found on google after searching for "opinion dictionary":

1. a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
2. a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
3. the formal expression of a professional judgment: to ask for a second Medical opinion.


So there you go, CP - 1. is an attempt to make a factual statement based on insufficient grounds, 2. is personal appraisal, or "attitude", that doesn't have to be factual in the first place.
I'm challenging the dictionary, though?

Already two completely different meanings. Passing an "opinion as a fact" would be two completely different things, depending on which meaning you're using. The rebuttals would have to be different, too.
In one case, you explain how the evidence or reasoning is insufficient, in the other, you get philosophical about subjectivity and objectivity, and how there is a distinction between the two main mental states, one of which is about knowledge of the external world, and the other about appraisal, values, and conceptions of how one's own ideal world might look like.


So which is it now? Have I passed a judgment as a proven fact? Or maybe stated my personal taste as a well-founded judgment? Or maybe I claimed to have scientific proof for how fun the remake of King Kong is?
Or have I just stated a well-founded opinion as a well-founded opinion, in contrast to someone else's poorly-founded opinion, and that got their feelings all hurt?

I'm waiting for examples. :D