twooffour

Can't help but to talk search and delve into something they claim to hate (it just seems counterproductive, to me). I wouldn't say you specifically, but if I had to say any names, the OP would be one of them.

Summary of this thread:

"We're a bunch of children who couldn't stop ourselves from creating a huge silly fuss out of nothing, all the time. So we have to accomplish that by giving each other vows and pledges like in an addiction support group."

This comparison makes even more sense when you consider how Alcoholics Anonymous are best advised to never touch any alcohol, ever, again -- in contrast to normal people who can take a healthy, regular dose with ease, and don't even have to give it much thought, let alone reassure each other that they'll stay true to their "vows" at all times... in the future.

Heh.
Not a huge problem really, just wondered whether you realized how this all comes off... ah, now you do. Well, perfect :D




________________________

I knew as soon as I wrote that that you were going to say that.  And as I've said many times before, for someone whose primary shtick is complaining that people don't read your posts, you sure as hell don't read, do you? (hint: look down at the bottom of every single one of my posts like C3PX and I have been constantly telling you to)  But, damnit all if bkev didn't already give the game away.  Darn.  We were having fun too, watching him constantly get that wrong despite us very obviously pointing him in the right direction every single time. =P

As a matter of fact, I had actually read that sig a couple times, but I took it as some kind of inside joke / jab, and just shrugged.
Please tell me how I was supposed to know it was meant seriously (just the last line, actually)?

What I remember, though, was both of you telling me straight ahead that you're a woman. So I took that as the "truth".


It's funny to see how you're trying to sneak in a score here, but sorry, you fail HARD.
When I complain about you or someone else not reading my posts, it's always specifically referring to you... responding to my post, while blatantly overlooking or going over something of relevance.

I'm not supposed to search the entire forum for people's contradictory, humorous gender claims, and I'm also not expected to read everyone's signature, or take them seriously - seeing as how 80% of signatures are mostly jokes, and yours is written like one, too.

So no, you don't get to accuse me of reading failure here. Sorry. I know you wanted to.

Anyway, the rest of twooffour's post is just his usual "I'm not the problem, every single other person in the entire world is," tirade that, if I'm not mistaken, is what keeps proving Frink's point to everyone.

Well, you are mistaken.
Frink's point was that I was TROLLING (a point long debunked), and claiming that I'm not the problem but others are, doesn't qualify ANYWHERE as trolling.

Especially if it's true. Which it is.

Also love how you're saying "the entire world". No. Not the entire world. Just you handful of people.
simply because you act stupidly, doesn't mean the rest of the world is, too.

Besides, if you read my post again (which you obviously didn't do), you'll see that it's entirely about explaining to you how arguments determine who has the high ground in a discussion, and not some kind of "rant" about "how everyone else is the problem".

It's quite amusing how, in addtion to the utter ridiculousness of having to explain basic things things like this to an adult person, you aren't capable of getting it even THEN, because the entire post was wasted on a mind firmly prepared to disregard everything in it, while replacing the content with its own insipid nonsense.

"Again, anyone could be right or wrong, it's how they back up their claims that determines it. You simply didn't do that, which is why..."
"Ah, he's just rantin about some stupid shit, LOL"

Mhm.


You know what I love? Even now, standing on top of a thunderous mountain while proclaiming your glorious triumph of deceiving me about your gender, your post is still... an unadulterated paragon of EPIC FAIL.

Proving all my "rants" about my "superiority" completely right, all over again. Sorry, don't have much of a choice when faced with bare-faced stupidity of this magnitude.

And I can dish out such bold claims, because I can actually back them up. Every single time.



Okay, NOW no more edits ;)

bkev said:

 

twooffour said:

spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway.[/i]"

What, are you lesbian?

he's a man, everybody just thinks he's as beautiful as the Princess.

Also, I'm terribly sorry to hear about your fiancee Gaff. I didn't even know you HAD one.

 

Ah... well, then... last time I'd apparently offended Betty here (and a few others) by calling him a he... so... I'm not even gonna ask. Just... whatever :)

I officially disrespect all of your genders from this point on. With Bible in hand, and Ham.

TV's Frink said:

RedFive said:

Just the fact that it's come to this is sad. 

I agree.  It could have gone a bunch of other ways, all of which I would have preferred.

Added.

So let's examine one of those "ways you would've preferred", shall we?

It's one I've already articulated here... ready? NOT HAVING STARTED THIS DEBACLE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
After having started, you could've at least avoided popping in random threads to say hi.

That obviously would've been a far more dignified way of handling the situation, than this hilarious soap opera of people "pledging" and "vowing" to do something they could've done silently from the start, without all the ham.

But you obviously weren't able to do that. So I guess starting a dramatic thread is the only resort you've got left to keep your hilarious childish tics at bay - but hey, better than the previous variant for sure ;)


(Wink smiley means Wink, btw; don't respond)

Gaffer Tape said:

Hmm.  I'll have to think about this one for a bit, Frinky.  On the one hand, you're absolutely right.  Twooffour is probably one of the most obstinate, delusional, arrogant, annoying, convinced-of-his-own-infallibility people I've ever had the displeasure of communicating with since my ex-fiancee, and considering that she just sent me a half-assed "apology" accompanied by a long, rambling letter of why she was still, in spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway... wait, what were we talking about again?

Oh, yeah.  On the other hand, yes, I've already long since stopped bothering to communicate with him.  Makes me feel all icky inside.  But I admit I do get some jollies in watching people like Frink and Mrebo debate with him and watching the hijinks ensue and the crazy rationalizing come out of his keyboard.  It will be a shame to see that go away, although I can understand why Frink has finally thrown up his arms and decided it wasn't worth the effort, since, as I just said, I went through the same process.

So all of that said... I'm not sure if I'll take the pledge of not.  But I'm certainly leaning in favor of it. =P

"and considering that she just sent me a half-assed "apology" accompanied by a long, rambling letter of why she was still, in spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway."

What, are you lesbian?


Anyway, what a laughable post.
Questions like who in a debate is delusional, "convinced" of (rather than witnessing) their own "infallibility" (or should I say, correctness in a given situation), or "rationalizing" (rather than being rational and making sense) - are decided with, guess what? ARGUMENTS.

If you think someone is delusional or wrong, you should MAKE A CASE for that.
Now I don't remember our last argument, but I'm pretty sure I've made lots and lots of cases against your points and tactics - tons of unintentional irony, hypocrisy, failure to comprehend a post, and and and.
You haven't managed to do ANY of that, in fact you've always got lost and lost track, while getting terribly pissed and abusive (far more than myself at the time).


So for you to sit here, backed up by the false security of other users nodding at your post in agreement, and make empty claims about my fallacies and thought failures, means, precisely... dick.

Anyone can say "you're wrong and delusional lol" - far less can actually make a case for that without looking like buffoons themselves (and failing to make the case while at it).
Pick any of our exchanges, I'll most probably do just that - I know because I already have.

PSYCHO_DAYV said:

I REALLY COULD'VE CARED LESS UNTIL twooffour STARTED PROVING FRINK RIGHT IN THIS VERY THREAD.

 

DONE.

Interesting.

He accuses me of trolling - arguing with people solely to get angry reactions.
And somehow, I'm proving him right by... posting in his thread aimed against me.

Yea, I really like to start trouble do I not... what is it with people and logic these days?

He gets his kicks being a brat, then telling everyone how much smarter he is than them when they're annoyed at him. I'm sure this makes him very popular at his middle school.

So why does everyone seem to believe that someone who behaves a certain way on a certain internet board, shows the same patterns in real life? Where does this obsession come from?

I think it's just so you can feel better. "Oh, this guy here, he thinks he's so smart, and I can't disprove or challenge him in any way, which sucks -- but at least I'm sure he's terribly unpopular in that primary school he's been visiting or 10 years! Yea, let's see how that kind of behavior works for him in real life!"

Well... no... sorry; you won't get even that.



This post is a prime example of someone who just doesn't have the balls to retreat completely.
This guy claims to be ahead of the curve, yet he can't resist posting a few snippy remarks in my general direction even though he has me on ignore and has NO IDEA WHAT I'M SAYING, aside from a few quote snippets.

Moving on and retreating is dignified; trying to score a few blows from that position, is laughable and pathetic. Like the fucking ostrich in the sand. And it doesn't matter how many other ostriches approve or say they agree - you're still exposed.

All I can say is I didn't feel I could hold to my personal pledge unless I threw it out in public where people can rightfully call me out if I violate it.

Because it worked so well last time... "they can take my eyes out, but they can't take my honor!"... yea.

And I thought I had addiction and obsession problems. (Actually, only the former.)

Yea, siding with Boost there. How gloriously stupid. Don't reply to this post.

TV's Frink said:

Holy carp.

I'm dead serious when I say I didn't even catch the thread title meaning until this post.

I guess my pledge is really working!

No, Frink. It's something else.

(Don't reply to this post.)

TheBoost said:

Imagine you have a big nasty boil on your face. It hurts. So you throw a bandage on it and try to ignore it until it goes away.

Now imagine that everyone you meet, despite also hating boils, feels the need to talk about your boil, and poke it.

If that's how strongly you feel about some guy on a Star Wars forum, maybe you need a therapist.
But you won't get the help, because you're not reading this post ;)

2/4's a big shmuck. We get it. He gets his kicks being a brat, then telling everyone how much smarter he is than them when they're annoyed at him.

No, not annoyed; when they act stupid.
But if you wrote that, you would be putting down those you're siding with, so you'd rather twist it around.

The issue seems to be that some people would prefer to act stupid without being told about it.

I'm sure this makes him very popular at his middle school.

He's probably proud of how many threads there are discussing his antics.

It's kinda amusing, but 90% is vicarious embarassment.

BUT LET IT GO. I can't ignore him with you dudes constantly quoting him, discussing him, and poking the boil.

Totally agreeing with that. Stop acting like children and grow up.

I'm counting the 6th thread now.

(Aliens, T2; this movement)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOosiyw7t00#t=79

Ah, missed this one... so I guess that would be the 5th thread about how huge of a douche I am, eh?

How fucking pathetic is that?
Especially once you've realized that it's basically just some people not being able to take a few jabs in a discussion, and making a huge big deal out of that.

Normal people would've either shrugged it off or moved on. What a bunch of babies.

Warbles goes from:

*sigh*

Yea, a real awesome achievement of you there, tossing around debunked accusations.

No, don't read something that might actually challenge your statements. that way you might quickly run out of stuff to say. Just proudly ignore it, wait for a couple of hours, and then repeat the same nonsense elsewhere. It'll make you look like a genius.

he argues everything he can merely to get people to respond so he can do more of his "I'm superior" arguing carp.

Baseless accusation, happens to be false as well. Debunked.

And thus the only way we'll ever be rid of him is to stop replying to him.

Would take you a great deal of willpower to achieve that, considering that so far, you and a few others have been all too eager to actually ACTIVELY FUEL these pissing contests, by jumping into threads and STARTING IT ALL ANEW.

All I'm doing is being honest and blunt about my objections to given points. What you'll have to overcome is a fucking obsession.

I guess the more reasonable alternative of growing a thicker skin and learning to defend your points even when you don't receive pleasantries like "I respectfully respect your opinion, and it's just your opinion" from the other party, isn't a possibility here.
But then, indeed, if you can't put up with it, you should REALLY learn to bow out. Not come back with a snippy remark a few days later (or immediately after) even though it's your turn to put up a counterargument, no - just bow out.
I'm glad you finally got that, and you have my full support for your endeavour ;)

I realize I'm prime suspect #1 in engaging him, and this will be more difficult for me to follow through with than anyone.

:D

Please also pledge to do so.  This will only work if we all do it.  And I know many of you are already doing this silently, so I leave it up to you if you want to also do it publicly.  I understand if you wish to remain anonymous.

Wow, such pathos and drama (is this the 3rd thread created in my name? or the 4th? who created all those threads?) all over someone who isn't even a troll? (But you can't get why?)

The irony here: this entire, let's say "story", started with me acting snippy and condescending in some discussions. That's it.
I wouldn't have minded getting a few of the same kind back, as well as not. Certainly wouldn't have given a fuck if someone decided to just abort a discussion for whatever reason.

All this stupid flaming nonsense, arised because of YOU. Because YOU felt the need to jump in and point out how I shouldn't be saying things like "you're wrong". And it went on from there. Because YOU feel the need to reiterate that in one thread after another, even if completely uncalled for in a particular instance. I just enjoyed fighting back at the opportunity.

YOU made such a huge issue out of this, and if you've now finally decided it's time to put a stop of it, well I should bloody well think so.


Don't reply to this post.

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

Ah, thanks, I'd almost forgotten how much ass I kicked in those ones

So thanks ;)

It is tough keeping the women on the forum straight, isn't it?  Given how many thousands there are and all.  And that doesn't even count Gaffer Tape.

Why am I supposed to guess who's who all the time?

twister111 said:

 

twooffour said:

Ah, thanks, I'd almost forgotten how much ass I kicked in those ones

So thanks ;)

Actually you:

 

Nah, actually I did kick ass in that link above.

I remember failing at wall runs, though...

greenpenguino said:

TV's Frink said:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUl03hKpVuY#t=42 :DDDD

Look out, CP, he's cheering at you just for mentioning some dude's voice. He calls your post BRILLIANT!!!!! even though he hasn't heard your impression (especially if it was inside your head).

Let's see how critical you are of this kind of thing when it's someone you agree with. ;)

TV's Frink said:

twooffour said:

Wouldn't be right of me to go partake in the Special Olympics, either, now would it?

Well done.  Want to make another Asperger's crack again while you are at it?

 

Asshole.

Heh, you don't like it when your stupidites are pointed out, do you?

No "oops, that was stupid of me" in light of your IDIOTIC mistake above (which I would've done 10 times by now)... just "you mentioned special olympics, you asshole".
How convenient. How lame.


Oh, Frink also doesn't get why someone would use a wink emoticon, to express a wink.
He also doesn't know what scare quotes are.

Why am I even picking on this halfwit?

No, the OP introduced the pissing contest in this thread by writing a post about how much I suck in my posts, you FOOL.

Just how FUCKING STUPID RETARDED BRAINLESS do you have to be to assume that it's because "so because you disagree with the OP, it's shit"??! Even though you meant "turning to shit" as "turning from on-topic to pissing contest"??!


Alright, alright, this is too much. I'll leave you alone. Wouldn't be right of me to go partake in the Special Olympics, either, now would it?



FUCK.

So you all waste your time and have no lives. Congrats.

TV's Frink said:

Oh, look who turned ANOTHER thread to "shit."

The OP.

CP3S said:

You back them up in as far as saying that the things you are disagreeing with are bullshit because they are bullshit, you just say it in as many words as possible.

 

Meta Humuour at its finest.

"Look at me. I'm accusing you of not backing up your claims, just stating them, or backing them up with themselves.
However, I'm not going to back up this accusation myself, just state it.

The meta joke being that I'm making myself guilty of something I'm attributing to you, while not proving you to be guilty of it as I'm not backing it up.
So basically, I'm accusing solely you by telling, while condemning solely myself by showing.

It's like in that movie, "Be Cool", where Steven Tyler, playing himself, claims he's not one of those musicians who go on to star in movies, while doing exactly this by playing this role. The character exonerates himself, but condemns the actor! And they're the same person! Now wasn't that hilarious?

Or that other one, where the killer hits the wrong target, and then asks: "Well whose fault is that?"
Vince Vaughn: "... It's your fault? Duh?"

Hehe, yea I know, I do have my moments, LOL!"




...


Oh wait, that wasn't intentional.

Ok, are we done with this? Can we wrap this up?

Your silly accusations have no merit whatsoever, and I don't think I can keep debunking this stupid poppycock for much longer.

Notice how you hardly ever see me just pop in someone's thread and start throwing accusations at another user based on past disagreements (with that being the whole content of my posting). Have I done that? MAYBE once, or twice? Certainly not ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

Seems like I'm not the one who's trying to keep the pissing contest alive and rollin'.
This time it's the OP who decided to start it, though, so I guess it's alright.