timdiggerm

Can I obtain more currency by running a laserdisc audio mining program?

Frequently, it's cheaper.

SilverWook said:

It looks a bit like the dish on the Rebel Blockade Runner.

 And thus like the dish on McQuarrie's "Pirate Ship"?

SilverWook said:

The monkey whose eyes were matted into the shot could technically sign those photos too. ;)

 http://www.chimpsanctuarynw.org/blog/2013/03/how-long-do-chimpanzees-live/

Probably not.

MaximRecoil said:

ray_afraid said:

MaximRecoil said:

Also, consider your intellectual dishonesty (i.e., changing the words of quotations) noted.

 When did I do that?

You didn't. My mistake. I made a typo, and when you quoted my post it included the typo and I thought you had changed the quote. Sorry about that. I'll remove that false charge and fix my typo.

 It's probably better off if you just leave your own mistake where it is, so that reading this discussion is less confusing for others.

That is correct. James Early Jones could sign a photo of Darth Vader, you know.

Well I didn't think Han wouldn't get a replacement dish, but I guess they aren't all circular!

What are the chances this leads to the reconvening of the English Parliament?

That's amazing.

The ship looks great too.

MaximRecoil said:

According to "Wookieepedia", the X-wing was first used at the "Battle of Turkana", the year before the events of the original Star Wars movie ("1 BBY"), after stealing X-wing prototypes at the "Battle of Fresia" (also in "1 BBY"). "Wookieepedia" also says that the X-wing remained in use for over 40 years. 

I don't know where any of that information actually comes from 

If you check the citation on Wookieepedia, it credits the game Empire At War, but I'm positive its origin is the older game X-Wing. Either way it's EU.

TheBoost said:

I'm looking forward to stories not at all tied to 20 years of stories of very mixed quality.

 Pretty sure they'll be tied to 28 years of stories of very mixed quality?

The misleading part is "Official", which I suspect was an attempt to say "This is the Official thread for discussing this, because I, some normal user, said so, not one of those other threads haha!"

I really am surprised they're having Mayhew in EP7. But apparently his surgery & recovery went really well.

Given that costs cover server maintenance, yes.

haha, yes, 2d background fighters!

sugarless said:

Where is Kenny Baker?????? No-one has seen him on set!! How can they say they have all the original cast and yet no Kenny in R2......I have a bad feeling about this!

 Do you realize how little he was involved in the prequels? I think his role in AOTC & ROTS (maybe TPM too?) was to sit in the can for one scene. One scene only.

Warbler said:

But everyone seems to think it is bad.

 I am not very familiar with that viewpoint. I liked it, and it has generally very favorable reviews.

you should probably read the book

Stinky-Dinkins said:

IE (with Adblock).

 Oh umm

The tunics are very Naboo, but Star Wars is full of tunics.

zombie84 said:

Did I miss anything?

You missed so much! Empire Strikes Back: Revisited will be released soon!

Stinky-Dinkins said:

timdiggerm said:

Do you not see the tabs in your browser? At the top of the inbox? Lighting up colors when you get emails in each?

Lighting up colors? No definitely not. They're all subtle grey, same basic color as everything else, and they blend perfectly into the background right underneath the ads that show up in the area of the screen I always ignore. 

That's strange. They definitely light up colors for me when a new email appears in each one. Which browser?

TheBoost said:

Just read that his wife is saying the media is responsible for ruining their life.

I just don't even.

 People in abusive situations often want things to stay that way. Or at least they say they do. It's complicated.

Do you not see the tabs in your browser? At the top of the inbox? Lighting up colors when you get emails in each?

DrCrowTStarwars said:

The NFL was fine with it as long as they didn't have to see it now that they saw it they are upset.

 The NFL was fine with it as long as the public didn't see it. Now that the public has seen it, thus increasing public outcry, they fired him. Now, the public should have had a stronger response the first time, but it's a lot easier to get upset about graphic images than it is for just the idea of violence w/ aftermath photos. He should've been fired the first time, but at least they caught up with themselves?

Although, should we fire people for this? I'd like to know if there's a history of abuse here, or if this is the first time. If it's the first time, he seeks help and never does this again, that sounds like behavior we ought to promote (you know, other than the behavior of never doing this).