timdiggerm

darth-gary said:

The Hobbit movies are passable I guess, but they don't have scenes like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOqT5_AAPgo

 To be fair, that particular scene is more sort of thing to see after The Battle is over.

generalfrevious said:

BTW Is Cameron ever going to make those Avatar sequels? It's been nearly five years since the the movie came out, and that is not a good sign for a possible franchise. 

 Yeah, I've been wondering that for awhile now. He keeps talking about making them, but still isn't actually doing it. 

CatBus said:

There was a conveyor belt scene in AOTC? Seriously? Wow did that movie make no lasting impression.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4GE9RMTZI

KilroyMcFadden said:

The Hobbit is going to be able to be saved.  Imagine a fan edit coming in at about 2 hours.  There's a really strong story with great acting hidden inside all of that bloat.  The PT on the other hand...

 I'd settle for a 4 hour film with intermission based on the Extended Editions

but yeah.

Oh yeah, I guess a 3d-printed radar dish should have been a pretty good sign that there's a 3d-printer involved.

Just so there's no confusion, I made a comparison

Hey, if that kid wants to believe that's canon, who are we to stop him?

Also where's my brightness? This appears to be "300: The Phantom Menace"

I was being sarcastic.

Fang Zei said:

My own explanation for why Lucas changed it is that Shaw as Anakin's ghost was supposed to be representative of "the good man" Luke's father was before becoming Darth Vader.

 Probably should have used Jake Lloyd then.

They're not even canon anymore so who cares? Things aren't interesting unless they're canonical. Thanks, Disney.

xhonzi said:

Johnny Ringo said:

darth_ender said:

Clearly the stormtroopers of the OT are not the Aussie clones of the PT.

 You mean Kiwi.

Too bad New Zealanders are a bunch of cocky a-holes descended from criminals and retarded monkeys.

New Zealanders-  "Throw another shrimp on the barbie and ride around on your kangaroos all day."

 No no no, you're thinking of Australians.

I would prefer no ghosts

Oh now there's an idea. Have the graverobber in the film, don't reveal who she is, but also make it seem that Luke has turned. Then, reveal he's still good and the graverobber is Leia!

There are a few problems, even if I think it's a pretty solid theory

• If Leia appears in the film not-in-evil-garb, how will she hide the mechanical parts? I guess w/ skin like Luke, but then why take it off when she's being evil?
• If Leia does not appear earlier in the film, the graverobber's identity will be obvious. Everyone knows Carrie Fischer's in this film.

aalenfae said:

I feel like a complete dweeb updating a months-old thread, but ... I'm back! 

Well, I'd like to say "I'm back!" and I was going to upload some new, awesome stuff I've been working on in my absence, but it turns out that lighting struck my computer (almost literally), and a great deal of my prequel edit work was lost. HOWEVER, that does not mean that I will stop the edits. It just means that they will take a lot longer than expected. I intended to do a surprise release around the summer, but they'll likely take several months longer than that (and will perhaps be a little less extreme, but we shall see!)

In the meantime, I'd like to officially say that I'm back from my long time away, and in the coming months, you can expect some more cool stuff coming your way! 

 Oh man. How much was lost?

RicOlie_2 said:

I just noticed, with timdiggerm's reposting, that the second picture (in his order) has what looks like a crashed Star Destroyer in the background. That should be interesting. And we now know what the pig things are going to be used for.

 Interestingly, it's very clearly an EU Interdictor

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Interdictor-class_Star_Destroyer

Here's an imgur mirror of the latest art leaks, ordered as I saw fit: http://imgur.com/a/joWWK

Oh, but ANH Revisited doesn't have Jabba

AntcuFaalb said:

Bingowings said:

There are plenty of ANH edits using ANH:R as a source.

Any theatrical ones?

I'd pretty much like to watch pre-SE ANH adywanized.

But if there are going to be changes like upgraded effects, why not use the SE?

NeverarGreat said:

Erik Pancakes said:

It's actually set 5 years before ANH, not 10.

 If that's the case, why does Obi-wan look so young?

 Okay, I haven't actually seen the show, but after doing some quick reading, isn't his only appearance as a hologram recorded around or just after ROTS? So the message is something like 13 years old by the time it shows up on Rebels.

Then you should cite your sources, plagiarist.

You mean it's hard to take the EU seriously?

No, Frink's absolutely right. All you have to do is visit http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Jays-forum-narration-service/topic/17113/ and click "Subscribe"

You can now subscribe to this!