suspiciouscoffee

crissrudd4554 said:

Doesn’t empirically still imply objectivism???

Atlas said:

¯_(ツ)_/¯

Happy Captain Picard Day!

Since 2007, fans have celebrated Captain Picard Day on June 16th of each year.

OstroBirdo

(or, BirdOstro)

TV’s Frink said:

Wow, that’s some fantastic humor right there.

9/10

You can’t say something is fantastic, that implies objectivism or something.

Mario Kart: Drag Race

Come on, Nintendo, gimme an E3 announcement!

Last few I listened to:

And currently listening to:

Wasn’t Ostro just Birdo’s previous name before the gender change? Ostro being the “boy name” and Birdo the “girl name”? I only have the All-Stars version and don’t have the manual, so I wouldn’t know.

Tyrphanax said:

People act like not casting Donald Glover for Spider-Man is like spitting in the face of the fans, but Miles Morales is like 16 years old and Donald is in his 30s.

Either way, I’m really happy to see him in the universe in some capacity. He’s cool and I like him.

To be fair, Maguire and Garfield were both in their late 20s both playing teen Spidey’s. I am glad they got a younger actor for the MCU Spidey, though.

The music in BvS is good? It’s just two and a half hours of constant Zimmer BWAAHM™ sounds. I guess it fits rather well with the accidental-campy absurdity of the whole movie.

So the extended cut is a technically better film, but Superman is still a sadistic idiot. I’ll likely pass.

Tobar said:

Lord Haseo said:

I wouldn’t mind Link being an actual character this time around. I know for the longest we were supposed to project ourselves onto Link but having him at least talking what freshen things up a bit.

Be careful what you wish for…

My boy!

Including Virtual Boy games?

Holiday Special > Prequels

Speaking of Zelda, the next game has been shown at E3 and it looks amazing. I’m not a huge fan of the title, but I’ll wait until I play the game to determine whether the title is a good fit.

EDIT: I notice that it’s been mentioned previously by Haseo. Anyway, the Link above goes to the trailer (pun most certainly intended).

darthrush said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

My point (wasn’t clear, my fault) was that the Death of Superman is the worst thing about the entire movie. It’s insulting to waste that iconic story on the last few minutes of Snyder’s Abriged The Dark Knight Returns: Footnote To Justice League. It’s half-assed and unearned.

Agreed. Batman V Superman is like TPM. I tried to convince myself I liked it until I realized I truly thought on the inside it was terrible.

BvS fascinates me. It isn’t good at all, I constantly complain about it, and yet I still can’t really make myself hate it. I want to like it because this is the kind of movie we’re gonna get for the next several years or more. I keep reading articles and posts by Snyder fans trying to convince people that it’s genius, hoping that they’ll convince me simply because I don’t want to feel so upset and disappointed for the next decade or so. They never do though, they’re arguments are as shallow as the movie is (and pretends it isn’t), and I always end up more frustrated than before.

Also

I wanted this “Lex” to die so badly. I was initially against Bat-Branding, but by the end I was hoping Bats would brand his face. I would actually quite appreciate a hypothetical edit that actually ends with Lex’s face branded.

My point (wasn’t clear, my fault) was that the Death of Superman is the worst thing about the entire movie. It’s insulting to waste that iconic story on the last few minutes of Snyder’s Abriged The Dark Knight Returns: Footnote To Justice League. It’s half-assed and unearned.

Tyrphanax said:

moviefreakedmind said:

I almost never see movies 2 and a half hours and longer. It’s the main reason why I skipped Civil War.

The thing about Civil War is I didn’t realize how long it was. I was enjoying myself the whole time. I never had that moment where you drop out of the movie and have a small existential crisis as you realize you’ve been watching this thing for hours.

Civil War was pretty good about keeping interest all the way through. The other two equally long super-movies struggled under the runtime, though. X-Men felt a bit bloated and BvS was screaming CAN YOU FEEL THE RUNTIME AS IT TAKES YOUR DREAMS AWAY?

I dreamt I had a school teacher who photographed the multiverse. All the Earths lined up in a row.

He made us try to fit five large seats on tiny paper cars.

I like the Gungan cut more than the originally released Rush cut.

darthrush said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

I don’t like Superman: The Movie either.

Pushing aside all my issues with Clark’s characterization, I still hate everything pertaining to Luthor, Otis, and that dumbass ending.

It’s baffling that it’s a 4 stars on RogerEbert.com. Man of Steel is leaps and bounds ahead of the first superman.

If you don’t like the first Donner Superman, that’s fine. But saying Man of Steel is better? 'Em is fighting words!

LuckyGungan2001 said:

White and Nerdy (“Weird Al” Yankovic)

Hilarious, even by “Weird Al” standards.

It’s also entirely relatable!

Roundabout - Yes

I never saw 3. I think the first is a tad overrated honestly. It’s good, I’m just not a huge fan like a lot of people. Reloaded was alright I guess, and I never saw Revolutions.

Mark’s Down On Your Syntax said:

Superman mercilessly killing Zod at the end is just wrong though. Oh wait, wrong movie… Oh wait, no it’s not!!! Damn you Man of Steel haterz, damn you to the Phantom Zone! Remember your history! Never forget the atrocities of the 80’s!

What if I hate MoS for reasons other than the slaying of Zod?

Batman (1966)

Pure Silver Age silliness. Is it objectively good? I don’t know if I can really answer that. Do I love it? Absolutely.

Besides, even though it’s cheap, this Batman still has arguably the best live action adaptation of any comic bat-costume (unless you count BvS’ diet-Frank Miller suit)