I don’t get the problem with the running-in-heels thing. Women who can run in heels do exist, don’t they? In fact, wasn’t it the actress’s idea anyway? I think I read that somewhere.
My guess is that it’s the SE, and that if something is happening, it will be announced in May
Unfortunately I think you’ll be right about it being the SE. I believe that all iterations of the SE are counterfeit versions of the OT. George Lucas is a sociopath with a double digit IQ who cruelly took away our movies, and now Disney is tragically respecting his wishes.
While I guess I agree with some of the basic general sentiment there, the words you typed read like PT writing.
The theory went like this: many people remember that the bears’ name was spelt “Berenstein” – with an “e” – but pictures and old copies proved it was always spelt with an “a”. The fact that so many people had the same false memory was seen as concrete proof of the supernatural.
That’s because it was spelled with an “e,” thankyouverymuch!
^^Everything about this!
EU Films. Or NewEU/NuEU if you prefer, but personally I think of the EU as a massive collection of take-it-or-leave-it stories, which is why I have a hybrid personal canon. I accept Rogue One, may or may not accept the Han Solo movie, etc.
The OA
Episode 1 was meh. Episodes 2-5 were pretty damn good. Episodes 6-8 were hokey and silly.
6/10
Sounds like The O.C. but with Green Lanterns.
I’d have like the R2/3PO caneo much more if it was at the end on the Tantive, and without a line from 3PO. It’d fit better.
Batman provided the chainsaw.
It’s pink, too. Good to see Bats getting in touch with his feminine side.
That costume sucks Robin’s eggs, though.
All DC’s costumes do lately. I actually got over my kneejerk anger at the current status-quo shakeup, and actually accepted it (even if only because it’s tonally much better than most of N52 ever was), but all the costumes still suck. I mean, just look at Superman!
First the trunks, now the boots as well! What’s next, the cape?! He’s two antennae away from looking like The Tick!
But I digress…
The thing that makes this Emoji movie worse than all the examples brought up before is that, while those movies are all definitely cynical pieces of trash, at least they advertise something. Angry Birds is an ad for the game, Garbage Pail Kids is an ad for the cards, but what about Emoji movie? What does it advertise? Smartphones in general? Emojis aren’t owned by anyone, so who benefits? The studio didn’t even have to put forth the effort to get the rights for an IP, they’re just lazily throwing together a cynical heap of garbage simply because they can.
🆗, I think that’s enough B😂tching for 1⃣ night.
Mavimao said:
I forget who said it, but if ANH was released today, it would be crucified by today’s culture.Why ?
Were The Matrix, Avatar or Lord of the rings crucified by today’s culture ?
(and basically today’s culture has been partially defined by Star Wars so I don’t get your point)
(I don’t even understand the relevance here…)
You’re just repeating dumb statement which don’t mean anything trying to appear cool (you’ve failed by the way) or you really believe that ?
I’d certainly crucify Avatar. Either Avatar movie actually.
I wonder why IDW is involved.
Those big hardcover collections of the Star Trek comic strips were by them…
They have the license for Trek anyway, right?
I am disgusted that this trashheap of a movie will actually exist next year. The worst thing is that the very premise is so painfully cynical that they’re using that to help market it!
Cinema is dead.
We survived The Angry Birds Movie, we can survive this. Also, cheap movies capitalizing on fads won’t ruin “cinema”. Never has, never will.
Hyperbolic statement was hyperbolic.
I am disgusted that this trashheap of a movie will actually exist next year. The worst thing is that the very premise is so painfully cynical that they’re using that to help market it!
Cinema is dead.
…Jupiter Ascending, a failure but a new concept (like a squirrel-faced Matrix)
I fixed this because the way it was typed seemed out of character for you.
Thread rule number two, Joker has to die in an epic and creative way, like falling from a great height into the ocean, and getting electrocuted.
Batman provided the chainsaw.
…a reel blemish on the film.
WYSHS
One of these days, just as a neat little experiment, I’ll make pan and scan Force Awakens and Rogue One tapes, and then marathon them with my Faces OT set.
It was actually those images that first put the idea in my head. Those and this one:
^^Wasn’t she in a Batman episode?
How much advice could any of us have for this situation? I’m sorry, but I’m afraid wii have nun to chuck at you.
If we only knew if that airline VHS of TFA was letterboxed or not. 😉
AFAIK, it was letterboxed, I saw a picture somewhere.
One of these days, just as a neat little experiment, I’ll make pan and scan Force Awakens and Rogue One tapes, and then marathon them with my Faces OT set.
“I know” if it will be good or bad.
It will be bad.
pessimist.
But I do admit having a bad feeling about upcoming rule changes.
There was plenty of opportunity to keep things as they are. Now, it is what it is, and none of us can change it now.
We will adapt.
Indeed there was plenty of opportunity to keep things as they are right now, but it certainly wasn’t Warbler or Coffee or Bingo or 95% of the other posters here who needed to learn to straighten up and fly right in order to keep it that way.
Actually it was me. It’s all part of my complex evil scheme.
so you’re saying guardians of the imperial suite is a reference to storm troopers and the guardians of the whillis suite is a reference to rebels? Then what does Your Father Would be proud have to do with anything?
O you meant the soundtrack titles. Try asking again in a spoiler thread.
I never seen rogue 1. Someone should explain for those who ain’t watching it till it’s on video.
