ray_afraid

DominicCobb said:

ray_afraid said:

Who’s the “Gal” that didn’t make the cover?
And, yeah, Thanos? Even if they were talkin’ all media, not just films, I still can’t see him making the list.
And Robert Patrick over Arnold?
I’m callin’ shenanigans.
It is a cool looking cover though.

If they’re taking all of film history into account (rather than just the last few decades as the cover implies), my guess would be the Wicked Witch of the West.

Ooh, good call!

Nice, thanks!

JEDIT- Just realized that means I’ve seen it. lol. Oh well. I don’t remember it, so might as well watch again!

screams in the void said:

Star Wars Galaxy trading card(s)

Oh, I loved those! I had the first two sets before I gave my SW collection away. I still remember many of the cards very well.

Who’s the “Gal” that didn’t make the cover?
And, yeah, Thanos? Even if they were talkin’ all media, not just films, I still can’t see him making the list.
And Robert Patrick over Arnold?
I’m callin’ shenanigans.
It is a cool looking cover though.

LordZerome1080 said:

My attempt at offering another avenue of obtaining the OUT was met with jeers and belligerence instead of open minds and suggestions.

Welcome to the internet.

Neat! I’m pretty excited to watch it! If it’s on Hulu I’ll probably watch tonight.

LivJackell said:

I’m wondering how possible it would be to have Vader Be Force-choking the Rebel soldier at the start of the film. In the context of V & VI, using the actual hand seems silly to me.

Nah, it’s total intimidation. Up close, personal and scary as hell.

dahmage said:

its not that you didn’t believe in the sun. its that you didn’t believe it was coming back…

But just believing that won’t kill you. The morning will prove you wrong.
And if it’s true, then that reality will kill you, not your doubt in the sun.

Mrebo said:

Mocata said:

Mrebo said:

Mocata said:

TV’s Frink said:

Frank your Majesty said:

That’s why I disagree with the notion that you can show someone the Plinkett reviews in order to convince them that the PT is bad.

If you have to convince someone that the PT is bad, you cannot convince them.

Rational arguments / irrational viewers.

I think some members of this forum think the PT is good and don’t consider themselves irrational.

That’s the problem.

I don’t think it is.

The problem is insisting we must all come to the same conclusions. I enjoy discussing the merits and faults of SW movies. It’s silly and frustrating to go about with an intent of proving people wrong about their views of Star Wars. You may change someone’s view based on a discussion but it’s nothing to you if that doesn’t happen.

I agree.

Ronster said:

I only wish we could have the 90’s blockbusyers back!

Oh I hated those guys! Always blocking up the sidewalks with their busywork.

ChainsawAsh said:

4. Into the Wild Green Yonder

Huh. I don’t think I’ve seen this one.
TO THE VIEWING MACHINE!

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

I approve of your rating system.

I can’t support a system that makes it impossible to score a perfect 10, even though I dunno if I’d give any film a perfect score.

snooker said:

“Hope is like the sun. If you only believe it when you see it you’ll never make it through the night.”

ALLOL
If I die at night, let it be known that it was because I didn’t believe in the sun.

DominicCobb said:

yhwx said:

DominicCobb said:

Also, sorry guys, RLM sucks.

Not that I disagree, but why to you think that?

Nothing I’ve seen from them tells me they know much about film criticism, they’re just a bunch of loud fans with opinions.

Then you must not have seen much of them. They’ve made some silly Star Wars videos in the past few years (not the PT reviews), but most of their content is great.
They certainly know what they’re talking about while also being fans with opinions.

TV’s Frink said:

I thought I recognized the title of this and then randomly saw it lurking in my queue this morning.

Ha! This happened to me just now!
I’ll check it out tonight.

Frank your Majesty said:

most of a Plinkett review is. Nitpicking.

Except it’s not at all.
Sure, he picks some nits, and even points these out, but most of the review is solid analysis.

J0E said:

You can pick apart the OT Plinkett style if you wanted to.

People say this, but nobody does because nobody can.
We’re back to the ol’ “There all bad movies!” argument again. bluh.

You mean you watched the first season?
Yes, the others are good too.

Warbler said:

I suspect there will be a big fight about it. People will not like being forced not to drive and being forced to buy a self-driving car.

Yep. Ain’t happenin’.

Red Menace’s reconstructions are fantastic!
I can not recommend them enough.

suspiciouscoffee said:

I didn’t see either Kong or Apes, but based on images, trailers, and clips I’ve seen in various parts of the web, I would say Apes has the better vfx.

They’re pretty close really. I just feel that Kong has more impressive shots. There wasn’t a moment when I didn’t believe I was really seeing these gigantic creatures. Apes looked great, of course, it just didn’t have the awe inspiring shots that Kong was full of.
Opinions, of course.

DominicCobb said:

ray_afraid said:

Meh. I think everything in Kong looked better than Apes.

That’s a hard “ya crazy” from me.

Well, ya got me there. 😉

Mark E. Smith.
Damnit.

Meh. I think everything in Kong looked better than Apes.