KillerQueen said:
Oh yeah… Classic rock is my thing.
Killer Queen is one of my favorite songs, hence, the username.
Welcome aboard! You should check out the Classic Rock thread.
I don’t even know where to start with a question as broad as “What is wrong with Attack of the Clones?”
My main complaint is that the whole thing was just so boring. Not to mention nothing made any sense. The two of those coupled together is what made it so impossible for me to watch.
I’m currently halfway through side 1 of Exile on Main St. by the Stones.
I somehow have gone my entire life without hearing it so I’ll let you know how I like it. Not that anyone cares.
I don’t think his point was that Satan made the movie, I think he was glad that it was teaching children to not be weary of predators. Whatever it was it sounded perverted and ridiculous. I would bet money it was a troll post though.
If you don’t think Androids exist, you aren’t racist, you’re blind.
#blindshaming
they are all real.
No, it’s a freemason scam
Also, is that “racists” (plural) a mistake, or have you been multiple people this whole time?
stop trying to start trouble with me.i sed not literally one word to you.so stop trying to star with me.so
I seem to recall the bonus features mentioning that a lot of people were tricked into thinking it was real after seeing Thunderball when it was first released.
George Lucas also stole it in TPM.
I still don’t believe in Androids.
I guess that makes me racists… And sexist.
I hate communism. I hope you’re all offended!
Psst… Androids aren’t real.
I hate Christmas
I’m probably going to regret this, but why hate you Christmas?
Because it’s stressful, the stores are busy, and it (for the most part) has nothing to do with Christianity or giving, but rather trampling people at a store to buy cheap crap, and then return it on December 26. It also leads to a formal family get together, which I find incredibly stressful. Hate is a strong word, but I don’t practice it, and I do not endorse it.
It’s the new OUT blu ray release. It hasn’t been officially released yet, but it’s on Myspleen.
Why can’t we go back to E pluribus unum?
I’m fine with that
Last night at a party, I seriously heard the phrase, and this is word for word verbatim, “What kind of faggot never played Mario Party?” Though I cringe at the language, it is a fair question.
I’ll say it is!
I can tell you I trust CNN more than International Cops for Christ, whatever that is.
im a member of international cops for christ.so stop trying to start trouble.youre just a troublemaker.i leterally said not one word to you.so youre a bandwagoner.i did not say a word to you.so.sto.making.trouble.so.stop.t
You guys are going to hate me…
I support your ranking for the most part. I really liked both Into Darkness and 2009. I would put #'s IV and VI much higher though.
I hate Christmas so people can declare war on it all they want for all I care. By the way, a reference to an unknown god is not respecting a religion. The fact that most of the founding fathers were deists and referenced “the creator” in founding documents is a testament to that.
By the way, the second amendment does protect the use of “assault weapons” (which is a subjective term). Machine guns are already nearly impossible to buy and sell legally. People in favor of any type of weapons ban need to argue an amendment to the constitution. I don’t support the idea that the constitution is a new age “living, breathing” document, if the constitution doesn’t allow a law, then it must be amended in order to pass that law. For example, the war on drugs is unconstitutional. The federal government has no power to outlaw substances, which is why they had to amend the constitution for prohibition.
That’s probably a conversation best held in the Politics thread 😃
I don’t understand the whole “protection from religion” thing.
I understand it completely, but I don’t understand people (not anyone on here I’m sure) who believe that a reference to a nondescript deity on the currency is somehow an assault on the freedom from religion.
Ah, That '70s Show … It was one of my favourite TV shows during my high school years, but I began to like the main cast of characters less and less throughout the last three seasons; maybe it was just me, but everyone seemed to be turning into wholly unlikeable assholes (except for Red, of course; he remained awesome throughout the entire run of the series). Also, I hated it when Donna went blonde.
I really need to rewatch the show myself, though; I have fond memories of the early seasons, particularily the first season.
You’re right, when Donna went blonde was a turning point in the series. I enjoyed the whole show though, except for 95% of season 8. They should’ve just ended it after Foreman and Kelso left the show.
All the first amendment says regarding religion is that the government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Regardless of any of our personal opinions, have a reference to a nondescript deity on currency is not a constitutional matter.
We need a Ranking the Ranking the Star Wars Films threads thread.
Isn’t it supposed to? Lol. It’s one of those shows that’s fun to watch but itisnt very funny.
Sure, I was just joking. I actually think it is very funny though.
I just started re-watching That 70s Show, but it feels really dated now.
The first amendment says the government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, so the money is hardly unconstitutional.
I think it is nice that the government acknowledges that they are not all powerful. Also, the founding fathers made clear that they believed liberty came from a power higher than man. It’s in the Declaration of Independence, is that unconstitutional?
It’s an honor that something I said is being used as a name suggestion for lurkers.
As much as I respect religious people despite my atheism, I will say “oh my god” as much as I damn well please as long as it says “In God We Trust” on my money.
Interesting point. It’s kind of surprising it doesn’t say “Backed by Jesus” on the other side.
That would be unconstitutional as it is an endorsement of a specific religion.