I need to play Spider-Man 2 sometime. It was past my time for it to be nostalgic at all, but I remember it being really good, but that was before movie-licensed games became total shit as a whole.
Begins and TDK are great crime dramas. TDKR is a pretty cool popcorn disaster flick, but it’s too long.
That’s pretty much how I’d sum up my feelings on all three of them.
EDIT: I also agree with Haseo that the Bruce Wayne scenes in TDK were good as well.
Just so we’re on the same page here: I didn’t like BvS either.
I just don’t get the idolization the Christopher Nolan Batman movies get when they’re only passable.
I really liked the Dark Knight and most of Batman Begins because they felt a lot more like crime dramas than superhero movies.
No, not at all, but I realize that to a different person that could easily describe the Christopher Nolan Batman movies.
My problems with Man of Steel (didn’t see BvS) had nothing to do with minute plot issues. It really didn’t even have to do with plot issues; I just couldn’t stand it because it was loud, long, and obnoxious.
If the original trilogy gets barred because of Marvel then that’ll seal my hatred of them.
Captain America (1990) - 9/10
Almost a masterpiece, and infinitely better than anything Marvel’s done in years. It’s better than the Captain America today, both in performance and plot. It even has better special effects! My only complaint is that it was too short. The film ended with me wanting more.
Overall, I give it a thumbs up!
I doubt it’s a feud. Most of those feuds revolve around making and releasing new movies, not distributing 40-year-old movies. I think Verta was talking about scheduling a meeting by the way.
Supposedly Verta is expecting an executive response by the end of August.
I remember liking it.
I have no real religious background. I was raised irreligious for the most part.
No, I wasn’t born into much of any religious family.
It was too long. I guess now that I think about it I did like the first Iron Man.
Oh, I forgot about that one. I liked most of it but the end was awful.
I don’t remember the ending, or anything else about the movie in general for that matter.
It was too long. I guess now that I think about it I did like the first Iron Man.
The etymological meaning of Lucifer is “bearer of light,” making Luciferians consequently the bearers of light and thus of the truth.
Also, last I checked, Protestantism has its origins in the 16th century, before which time, Christians were almost universally Catholic or Orthodox, and it is they who invented the rule that all true doctrine must come from the Bible (note that that rule isn’t anywhere in the Bible…). Talk about changing the rules, huh?
Before the Catholic church, there was no all-encompassing institution that governed the individual churches. 2 Timothy 3:16 also set the standard for living by the scriptures.
EDIT: Just so you know, I have no loyalty to the protestant churches. I don’t think that an individual church should be very big. The bigger, the more corrupt.
I can’t remember exactly what you’re religious beliefs are. Could you remind me?
It comes and goes.
I never counted those early superhero movies. I also liked the 1960s Batman. They were closer to action, adventure-comedies than anything else. Now Superheroes are their own genre, and I didn’t care for the first Avengers.
I think they’re all better than pretty much any superhero movie ever made.
Yeah but superhero movies pretty much suck.
I love the two Burton Batman movies but those aren’t superhero movies.
Yeah, I like those also. Other than that I disliked almost every superhero movie I’ve seen other than Guardians of the Galaxy, which was pretty funny. I didn’t really consider that a superhero movie either.
I think they’re all better than pretty much any superhero movie ever made.
I still don’t know why some think TDKR is a bad film. It was disappointing for sure but it was pretty well made.
I thought it was as good as the Dark Knight.
EDIT: But then again I don’t view the Dark Knight as the holy grail that some people do either.
The etymological meaning of Lucifer is “bearer of light,” making Luciferians consequently the bearers of light and thus of the truth.
Also, last I checked, Protestantism has its origins in the 16th century, before which time, Christians were almost universally Catholic or Orthodox, and it is they who invented the rule that all true doctrine must come from the Bible (note that that rule isn’t anywhere in the Bible…). Talk about changing the rules, huh?
Before the Catholic church, there was no all-encompassing institution that governed the individual churches. 2 Timothy 3:16 also set the standard for living by the scriptures.
EDIT: Just so you know, I have no loyalty to the protestant churches. I don’t think that an individual church should be very big. The bigger, the more corrupt.
The etymological meaning of Lucifer is “bearer of light,” making Luciferians consequently the bearers of light and thus of the truth.
Also, last I checked, Protestantism has its origins in the 16th century, before which time, Christians were almost universally Catholic or Orthodox, and it is they who invented the rule that all true doctrine must come from the Bible (note that that rule isn’t anywhere in the Bible…). Talk about changing the rules, huh?
Before the Catholic church, there was no all-encompassing institution that governed the individual churches. 2 Timothy 3:16 also set the standard for living by the scriptures.
But why does quality really matter if you enjoy it?
Meh, don’t know, I just put it there anyway. Maybe I should have two different ratings, one for quality and one for enjoyment.
I don’t rate things, but if I express my opinion about a movie I usually differentiate between the two. For example, one of my favorite movies is the Village, but I don’t call it a great movie objectively.
But why does quality really matter if you enjoy it?
There’s a V2.7?
The speculative ones, to the point of being inconsistent for the sake of so-called purity is when it loses me.