logo Sign In

moviefreakedmind

User Group
Members
Join date
22-Jul-2014
Last activity
26-Apr-2023
Posts
8,754

Post History

Post
#1242037
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Random political thought:

I’ve seen a lot of “leftists” vs. “liberals” stuff lately, and I wonder, since when did “liberals” become synonymous with specifically center-left democrats? I always thought “liberal” was just a general term that encompassed the entire left.

Funny, I saw this the other day on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlIjMJBSnRE

That’s a perfect example. PragerU is a rightwing propaganda outlet.

Post
#1242009
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

CatBus said:

Warbler said:

Collipso said:

most countries do at this point in time.

in democracies there are ways to solve problems without resorting to an actual revolution.

The discussion was triggered by the mention of upcoming challenges to the Voting Rights Act under the new court. I’m not sure large swaths of this country qualified as functional democracies prior to the VRA, and I see no reason to believe they’d qualify as such after it’s (hypothetically) struck down.

That said, I think the (remaining bits of the) VRA will survive, unless Trump is able to also replace Roberts or a moderate at some point in the future. But if he does, it’s toast.

Then lets not talk revolution unless and until that does happens and Jim Crow returns.

I’m the one talking revolution, so if you’re going to effectively participate in the discussion then you need to actually address the person whose points you’re complaining about. Your standards are awful, though. You think it should get as bad as Jim Crow returning before revolution is necessary? What about the right to gay marriage getting rescinded?

Post
#1241933
Topic
Doctor Who
Time

There have been plenty of both great and shitty shows that have had less-than-impressive ads. It wasn’t even a bad ad, but I’m sure equally mediocre and pandering advertisements have been used in the show’s past. I know you’ll just ignore all this truth that I’m laying down right now, because I’m mean (or whatever), but you should consider what I’m saying, at least.

Post
#1241909
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

IMO Round 1 is certain to overturn both Obergefell and Roe. Round 2 is going to be centered on overturning Griswold, striking down the Civil Rights Act, and the remainder of the Voting Rights Act – and we’ll be counting on Justice Roberts to hold the line there. Yeah, that Justice Roberts. A Republican-dominated court we’ve lived with for decades (might actually be over a century, not sure). This court would be different.

The only good thing is that I don’t think they’ll be able to put those back in the bottle. There will be blood in the streets if they do. It’s a perfect example of when violence is justified.

Post
#1241899
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/07/kavanaughs-non-answer-same-sex-marriage-many-heard-troubling-answer/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.445a28edd65a

I’m pretty concerned about how a Trump Supreme Court will handle the rights defended by the Supreme Court in the past. I think restricting gay marriage (and gay rights in general), restricting abortion and birth control rights, as well as the protection of draconian obscenity laws could end up being forced on us by this fascistic rightwing court that Trump wants to construct.

Post
#1241870
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

It is clear this is marketed to feminists. ugh.

I just watched it and I don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. There was nothing overtly feminist in this trailer at all. The only thing that kind of seemed like it could be feminist was when they said that she was in charge, but what’s wrong with that? It’s a totally out-of-context scene from an episode that hasn’t aired yet. I don’t see how anyone other than a total easily-offended snowflake could be bothered by something that innocuous. The only thing that’s clear to me is that you’re looking for reasons to have a problem with this show.

Post
#1241671
Topic
Religion
Time

I hate the celibacy vow, but I don’t think that’s why there is so much abuse. My assumption is that pedophiles become priests because they know that they will not only have access to children, but also that the Church will protect and enable them in their crimes. They would have access to children in schools, daycares, summer camps, or sports teams, but accusations typically are and have been taken very seriously in those settings. You still see tragic cases of abuse in schools and sports, but not thousands of students abused by thousands of teachers in single cities where the districts ensured that the teachers be allowed to continue their abuse. The protection is what draws them, I think.

Post
#1241633
Topic
Religion
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

moviefreakedmind said:

It involves a minority of Catholics, but a majority of the Church’s most powerful officials are complicit at least.

Citation? I highly doubt that’s the case. I’m not sure how much you know about the way the Church works, but bishops are pretty autonomous, so the way they deal with issues is pretty localized.

They all know about it and most are choosing to do nothing. The current pope and his immediate predecessors know or knew about it and there’s direct evidence that Benedict XVI was directly involved in coverups before he became pope. The sex-abuse and their coverups are common knowledge. Ask anyone on the street and they’re familiar with it. Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that the majority of officials in the Catholic Church are blissfully unaware of the mass child abuse that happens in its institution?

It’s official policy to handle them internally rather than approaching the police, and by “handle” I mean relocate the offender to a new, unsuspecting parish. In the United States, and most civilized countries, abetting a felon is also a crime. I’m arguing for the religious institutions to be dismantled because of their crimes. If it turned out that JCPenney’s was doing this, then there’d be no debate over shutting down the corporation and arresting those responsible.

Where is this official policy? The reports that are coming out address incidents that have happened over the last 70-or-so years. Things have changed quite a bit in the last two or three decades. In most of Canada, I believe it has been official policy since the '80s to report things to the police.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pennsylvania-report-catholic-clergy-sex-abuse-scandal_us_5b2d4062e4b00295f15c56db

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/12/world/europe/german-church-sex-abuse-children.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fworld

https://nypost.com/2018/08/14/australia-archbishop-gets-house-detention-for-abuse-cover-up/

Also, happening over the last 70-or-so years is meaningless. “The last 70-or-so years” includes yesterday and today. I find it weird that you think “the church has done this throughout history” is a valid excuse. It actually plays more into my argument that the Church be viewed as a crime ring.

As for repression vs. integration or whatever, that just sounds like Newspeak to me.

Well it’s not. We get professional psychologists to come in and talk to us about this stuff. It’s science. And I can personally attest, and can attest for many other seminarians and priests, that we are not even remotely repressed. I am quite prepared to commit to celibacy, and would very much not want to marry and be a priest (waaay too much work, and the stress of having to devote oneself to both a family and a parish would be unbelievable). There is an incredible freedom that comes from proper sexual integration and self-mastery, and it is possible to do.

Use all the Newspeak that you want, but being taught that your urges and lust are sinful crimes against the Almighty (who has the power to consign you to hell, mind you) is repression. You may be content with it, but you are repressing your desires. And also, the repression in Christianity and Islam, and many other religions too, goes beyond the clergy.