logo Sign In

moviefreakedmind

User Group
Members
Join date
22-Jul-2014
Last activity
26-Apr-2023
Posts
8,754

Post History

Post
#1174076
Topic
[fill in the blank] Just Died!
Time

yhwx said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Even if he had, he wasn’t a foaming-at-the-mouth neo-Nazi preaching intolerance and hatred.

That’s not an excuse.

He was also 100 years old. I know to a lot of people that’s not an excuse, but ancient and archaic people tend to tacitly hold some archaic views. It’s a fact of life. Abe Lincoln was a racist by today’s standards.

Post
#1165723
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Handman said:

moviefreakedmind said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

There’s nothing quite like seeing water leak from a ceiling light.

Goddammit, how I want a job and money and to MOVE OUT OF THIS FUCKING SHITHOLE.

You have internet access so there’s nothing stopping you from applying for jobs.

But getting responses, that’s the trick…

Apply for fifty jobs or something. It’s all a numbers game.

Post
#1165460
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

Warbler said:

I didn’t know that his wife had a half-sister

Yes, Sally Hemings was originally the slave (and daughter via slave rape) of Jefferson’s father-in-law. She was then transferred to Jefferson.

The more you learn about Jefferson/Hemings, the more ick.

The Churchill bit makes a good trivia question. “Which WWII leader’s diary featured long diatribes about Jewish conspiracies?” Very few will guess Churchill, but there it is.

They did enough good for me to forgive their antiquated bullshit.

Post
#1163933
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

chyron8472 said:

Handman said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

I still am under no obligation to like it.

You’re also under no obligation to steal Ric Olie’s thunder, and yet here you are.

If art is subjective, and I already said my opinion of the film was subjective, why then do you guys feel obligated to contradict me or say my preferences are in bad taste? Apparently having to defend my position is not a Captain Obvious move if people are telling me my initial reasoning is flawed.

But you gave nonsense reasons as to why you didn’t like it. Saying the movie is bad because you don’t know the name of a character for 20-something minutes is absurd.

They’re not nonsense to me, and you don’t have to agree, but I feel the reaction to my talking about it, (eg. saying my opinion is nonsense or absurd) is stronger in tone than is warranted. Maybe I did too easily take offense, I’ll admit that. But I don’t feel blame falls solely on my own shoulders.

Why are you playing the blame game? You shared your opinion. People thought that your reasoning made no sense and they clearly explained why. Then you get pissed off because people responded fairly cordially to something that you posted for us to read. And who are you to police tone? No one wrote anything even mildly offensive in their responses to you. Handman was right on in his assessment. Why post if you’ll just get angry when someone responds to you? If I posted that I hated Stand by Me because it had a narrator, a bully character that didn’t obey the traffic laws, and an ending that wasn’t entirely happy, then people would have reacted in the same way because I said I hated a beloved movie for reasons that make no sense.

Post
#1161403
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

dahmage said:

moviefreakedmind said:

I can think of no other reason why someone would be reading scanned pdfs and irritated by their inability to select text.

fair enough. I can think of a few

  • education level other than college
  • scientific research
  • non-scientific research
  • technical research

These are all academic reasons that are close enough to my speculation.

  • reading those books that google scanned (i don’t think they are OCR’d but maybe i am wrong)

Perhaps for a college assignment? Why else would you need to select the text?

  • reading a page you scanned yourself, or that someone else scanned.

Like for a college assignment.