logo Sign In

jimbo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
29-Sep-2003
Last activity
15-Apr-2005
Posts
1,715

Post History

Post
#52842
Topic
Harry Potter 3
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: GundarkHunter
Answers:
1. Dementors don't target specific people; their goal is to suck the joy from a wizard or witch, which makes it easier to gain access to their souls (ultimate goal).
2. He hadn't seen Sirius for 12 years; as far as he was concerned, until he knew Pettigrew was alive, Black was guilty.
3. Harry's Patronus; were you paying ANY attention?

Next round:
1. I wouldn't necessarily define Black as good; against Voldemort, yes, but no saint.
2. If you've read the books, you'd realise that Hagrid is a bigger soak than Dumbledore.
3. Follows the pattern of the other films; 1 match per film.

Any questions?


Spoiler warning for fifth book. Sirius is one of my favorite characters. He is basically the closest thing Harry has to a father. Which is why his death in the fifth book is so tragic. And yes the dementors were never after Harry. At least not in the third book.
Post
#52839
Topic
HD-DVD
Time
More news on the HD-DVD front is the DVD forum has approved HD-DVD spec 1.0. Priviously HD-DVD 0.9 was just the disc specs. Then they approved the MPEG-4, VC-9 codec as provisional. With this new approval they have been combined and now HD-DVD players will have to mandatory include MPEG-2, MPEG-4, and VC-9 in all HD-DVD players. What does this mean? It means that HD-DVD is now a finalized video standard and we will now start the race to get HD-DVD out on the market. They should be availble in America in late 2005.
Post
#52822
Topic
Harry Potter 3
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: ricarleite
Oh, about the whole "start reading true literature" thing, it was some sort of a joke I've made. Anything with more than 2 words is literature to me.


Sorry it didn't come off as a joke to me. Then again I am sure I have done that to other people before so whatever.
Post
#52741
Topic
Harry Potter 3
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: GundarkHunter
I beg to differ, and cite the example of Jurassic Park (the first one). Very little in the film was explained (@ least compared to the novel), certain characters were changed, and the ending of the film was drastically altered (in the end of the book, Isla Nublar is nuked). Does this make the film any less of a good film? NO! I could go on and on about the alterations that were made to the LOTR trilogy that no amount of expansion could possibly correct, and while I agree with many of the changes made, I disagree with almost as many. Are they still good films? YES! They may not be the perfect adaptations of the novels, but they work well cinematically, and the truth is, no adaptation will ever be truly perfect, because everyone who reads a novel perceives it in a different way; the fact that Cuaron's version of Prisoner of Azkaban has incited such discussion is a good sign. Why? Because it means that not everyone is willing to take Hollywood's word as gospel. I think it's a good adaptation because it takes chances on the audience's familiarity with the novel, and it has polarised fans of the films and the novels. Only a really good piece of filmmaking can do that. If everyone is in agreement as to quality, something is wrong.


I disagree. After reading the book Jurassic Park my opinion of the movie went way way down. I used to love it now its average to me. Really Prisoner of Azkaban was a much better adaptation then Jurassic Park but was an inferior adaptation then the first two movies. I believe the first two movies both adapted the book perfectly. Not everything was included but they had just the right amount. I believe Chris Columbus has more respect for the books then Alfonso Curanon does. Prisoner of Azkaban is missing details that are very very important.
Post
#52698
Topic
Changes in 2004 DVDs
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Galahad_Skywalker
The advertising also doesn't say that they aren't the originals. For those of us who have kept up-to-date on the DVD release, we all know what versions are being released, but still the general public won't have a clue. At least the 1997 Special Editions were clearly labeled as Special Editions; these are just being referred to as 'The Star Wars Trilogy.' Anyway, someone on this site provided a link to a site that got ahold of the trailer somehow, and I downloaded it and watched it. It is fairly misleading...nothing mentioned about changes or anything. They're relying on nostalgia and digital transfers to sway buyers. Heck, I'll admit it...it started to sway me, and I just got my original version bootlegs from Rikter yesterday, which are very solid copies, so it had nothing to do about his DVDs.


They don't have to say this isn't something. Thats like a slab of pork needs a label like this isn't to be used as dishwashing detergent. I hope if anyone buys these expecting them to be the originals and is disipointing I hope it teaches them to research a product before they buy it.
Post
#52695
Topic
Harry Potter 3
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: ricarleite
Or we could go with my idea, stop making Harry Potter movies, and quit reading that thing and start reading true literature.


Dude are you trying to make an ass out of yourself? Harry Potter has more story, substance, and imagination then most of that so called great old literature.
Post
#52686
Topic
George Lucas' explanation why the OT is obsolete to him
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Bossk
Crap works in the sense that any amount will turn you off. It may be disgusting, but we are trying to prove that even the smallest amount of change to the OT is a turn off. So you need to appeal using a comparison in which even a tiny amount will turn you off.

However, if you want to make a comparison using incremental changes to show how much more distasteful something can be, then the salt analogy works better. Look at the changes GL made for the SE. Now even more changes for the 2004 release. Finally, another set of changes for the 2007 UE. As each happens, he is adding progressively more salt to the recipe and making it even nastier tasting with each round of changes.


Hes improving the movies.
Post
#52685
Topic
Changes in 2004 DVDs
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Galahad_Skywalker
If they were going to make the trailer a Hyperspace exclusive, they could've at least inserted glimpses of the added footage. What's bothering me about their marketing for this set is that Lucasfilm has yet to come out and publicly announce what they're changing...of course, that plays right into their hands about misleading the customer for a profit.


Never claims them as original versions therefore is not misleading.