imperialscum

We think the darker tone is better.

Representative of humanity.

Alien is missing. Definitely more essential than Aliens.

And we have a winner of this year's "most boring thread topic" award.

Trident said:

OK I'm giving you god-like powers for a minute. What would you change?

I would change that one minute you gave me into eternity.

Trident said:

Sorry Duracell, I missed my period again

It could be that he made you pregnant! You better check it out.

darth_ender said:

^We are proud of ourselves. But we must watch our spelling of the team name. Unless that was part of our joke that we don't get at the moment.

Ender, are you also speaking on behalf of your 3 wives? :p

I like some of the sets. I like Tatooine, Coruscant (particularly in AOTC) and Utapau.

We agree.

It is not that they are having sex all over you. You are just being their penis.

Bring back dick!

Disney has them. But they are unwilling to share.

Is this still going on?

TV's Frink said:

we can't help you.

Okay, we understand.

TV's Frink said:

imperialscum said:

I kinda don't see why would it break the rules if there is only one guy using one account and speaks on behalf of someone else too.

 But we have seen that there are at least two people using the account.

How did we see that?

I kinda don't see why would it break the rules if there is only one guy using one account and speaks on behalf of someone else too.

So, TV's Frink/Ric Olie, let me know which account you want to keep.

Please deactivate the Ric Oile account.

Wrong decision.

John Doom said:

Have you seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyOUESbTCRk

At last a new Star Wars movie recorded on a REAL set! ;)

The set design reminds me on designs of imperial bases in SWTOR.

Well apparently this is an entire team we are talking about here. I think as a team, they are allowed as many accounts as the number of persons in the team. :p

If they do a restoration they should do it in the maximum possible resolution. Who cares whether people won't buy 4K at this very moment. The main point should be to preserve the film in highest possible format.

Well when I buy new PC monitor, there is no way I will buy anything less than 4k.

As for DVD vs BluRay, I wouldn't even think about buying somthing on DVD ever since BluRay came out.

Darth Lars said:

Not this resolution debate again... 

And also, streaming can not compare to disc. There are much lower bitrates for streaming than on discs and they are often adaptive to cope with changing network conditions, lag etc. 

The distance is to me an irrelevant parameter here. I mean to say that I don't consider farther from the screen being necessary better.

Possessed said:

Just stop bullying warbler by your existence, that's all we ask.  :)

Who gave you the permission to use "we"? When you speak for yourself you use "I".

John Doom said:

Now to stay off-topic, we know 4k televisions' resolution can only be appreciated on a big screen (probably bigger than 30")... now tell me, how are customers supposed to bring them home!? I'm not buying it :\

You don't get the point. It is not about the size of the screen. It is all about the sharpness of the picture.

Some time ago I got Mac with 13" retina display (2560x1600 resolution) and worked on it exclusively for a few months. When I came back home to my usual 24" display with 1920x1080 resolution, whenever I looked at it I saw squares everywhere.

I can most certainly appreciate the high resolution even on a smaller screen.

TV's Frink said:

Hell must be freezing over, as I have found myself in agreement with many of impscum's posts lately.

You are getting wiser.