imperialscum

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Have you played SWTOR?

No, but I hear that even with the Revan expansion there’s still little to noting to do in the end game so I don’t know if it’s worth it. Looks kind of fun for an MMO though.

Well SWTOR might be officially MMO but MMO related stuff is rather secondary to its storyline (single player) content. Basically I didn’t care about MMO stuff (PVP, end game PVE) or expansions and I kept my interaction with other players to an absolute minimum to maintain the immersion. I would also suggest avoiding any Revan related side story stuff.

If you ever decide to try you shouldn’t worry about having little to do. The original eight characters storyline content is huge. I would suggest trying Imperial Agent or Sith Warrior storylines. In particular, Agent got an universal praise among players.

TV’s Frink said:

“Help!” is not descriptive of what the thread is about. There is nothing about that statement that is opinion. And I’m not responding again because all you like to do is troll for responses.

The thread is about OP seeking help. The details about what kind of help are in his post.

If anyone was trolling it was you with off-topic stuff. This kind of behaviour is relatively frequent when it comes to you.

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

This is what happens when you make a shitty thread title.

Your negative opinion

Sorry, I should have said “non-descriptive” in order to make it not be an opinion.

It would still be your opinion. And besides, you are to read the original post, where in this case OP clearly described the general intention of the title.

TV’s Frink said:

You missed a period.

That’s okay. I am a male, I don’t have these things.

TV’s Frink said:

This is what happens when you make a shitty thread title.

Your negative opinion towards the title is not a justification to break the forum rules regarding off-topic posting.

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:
Some people are just BAD BAD BAD.

This is not about how bad people are. This is about how bad your justice system is to allows such things.

It’s about both, dumb-ass.

It is not. This really isn’t about some people being bad. This is about the justice system that provided a platform/tool for the person to be bad in a very specific way. At the same time, the justice system legitimised his bad actions. Without such justice system he wouldn’t be able to pull such thing off

TV’s Frink said:
Also, our justice system allows things. It doesn’t “allows” things.

Well there is a grammar mistake that occurred due to editing/restructuring my initial post and not paying attention to all adjustments. However, your attempt to point out the nature of mistake is quite lame.

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:
Some people are just BAD BAD BAD.

This is not about how bad people are. This is about how bad your justice system is to allows such things.

Have you played SWTOR?

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Well KOTOR2 just have too many ridiculous stuff in it (plus a disappointing ending) to be on par with KOTOR.

The ending did sucked ass I agree but I found the moral dilemmas and the greyness of everything to be even done better in Kotor II and I just enjoy it more than the first one. Also the combat is better.

Of course it has some nice moments but overall it is just not on the same level as KOTOR. SWTOR on the other hand I would say is for the most part on KOTOR level.

DuracellEnergizer said:
On the contrary, it makes me want to run out into the woods buck naked, tackle down and kill with my bare hands the first deer I come across, and then eat its uncooked flesh right there before the carcass has time to cool, all just to spite this plastic Hollywood slut.

Spite her? I don’t think she would care in the slightest.

Well KOTOR2 just have too many ridiculous stuff in it (plus a disappointing ending) to be on par with KOTOR.

DuracellEnergizer said:

And all this time I thought “Forcedidit” was an argument only the PT fanboys resorted to.

You will find TFA fanboys quite similar to PT fanboys in terms of arguments and defence of what they like.

I am sorry but KOTOR is pretty damn good. I can’t find any reasonable arguments against it even when compared to OT.

Lord Haseo said:
the trilogy that doesn’t need to be named

What is that.

Lord Haseo said:

I’m not sure you knew this but there’s more to Star Wars than the OT. A lot more. Some better; a lot worse.

Oh really? I want to hear more about this.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

Opinions don’t circumvent facts.

We are not discussing facts here. In case you didn’t notice, his thread is called “What didn’t you LIKE about TFA?”.

The way in which TIE Fighters are parked is something that is empirical and using Rebels as a canon reference is based on facts. Your opinion on the show has absolutely no bearing on the validity of a canon reference. Find another excuse.

That is like reading that Earth is flat a religious book (equivalent of TFA) and then trying to justify it with “empirical evidence” in a preceding religious book (equivalent of Rebels).

The point is, if stuff is crap you don’t take it seriously.

Lord Haseo said:

Opinions don’t circumvent facts.

We are not discussing facts here. In case you didn’t notice, this thread is called “What didn’t you LIKE about TFA?”.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:
On top of that, I think several EU sources introduced that concept way before.

indicate (to me at least) that these are separate points. I was completely warranted in leaving out the latter sentence.

You were warranted to leave out latter sentence, however you were not warranted to leave out half of the former, which is the point here.

Even then you not liking Rebels doesn’t mean anything when it’s a valid reference because it’s canon. It doesn’t matter if I included it or not because I can say the same thing to both statements.

I couldn’t care less about canon. Let me remind you what this argument is all about. My statement was my opinion and it had to do with the topic, while you implied it doesn’t pertain to the topic by quoting only a part of the sentence and asking a stupid question.

So again, justifying the use of stupid concept in TFA based on the fact that the same stupid concept was used in shit show like Rebels (canon or not) is not really a good justification.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:
On top of that, I think several EU sources introduced that concept way before.

indicate (to me at least) that these are separate points. I was completely warranted in leaving out the latter sentence.

You were warranted to leave out latter sentence, however you were not warranted to leave out half of the former, which is the point here.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

adywan said:

Dek Rollins said:

I would say the film wasn’t accurate because every single thing in the past has used that setup, EU or not.

Rebels introduced TIEs parked this way, before TFA did.

Rebels is shit

And that pertains to the topic how?

How about stop cutting things out of a sentence and read it as a whole before making such stupid question?

adywan said:

Dek Rollins said:

I would say the film wasn’t accurate because every single thing in the past has used that setup, EU or not.

Rebels introduced TIEs parked this way, before TFA did.

Rebels is shit, so it is not really a good reference.

On top of that, I think several EU sources introduced that concept way before.

TV’s Frink said:

DavidMerrick said:

Ah. Spoke to a TIE engineer about that?

Probably imperialscum.

Dr. imperialscum - the leading expert in the fields.

GlastoEls said:

Trust in Larry Kasdan, lads.

Well TFA was a letdown in terms of story/sreenplay. I would assume Kasdan was forced to work within the rehash framework of TFA. Therefore I hope he will have free hands on this one so that we may get something more interesting.

On the other hand I am not really fond of Han Solo backstory film.

The final cut. No doubt.