imperialscum

moviefreakedmind said:

Being fat is unhealthy. You can live a long time in spite of that, but it’s unhealthy. Smoking cigarettes is unhealthy too. I wasn’t aware that this was a controversial thing to say.

If you are disease-free and your body can perform daily activities normally you are healthy, weather you are fat or skinny, smoke or not.

Lord Haseo said:

I approve.

yhwx said:

I don’t really like the objectification aspect of it.

People don’t like objectification and self-objectification simply because they are jealous. They don’t like it if you show off your body. The same goes for intelligence and success.

TV’s Frink said:

Yes, he’s doing it wrong. We need a separate thread for your idiotic posts.

We don’t need an empty thread…

HansiG said:

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/958599

TV’s Frink said:

You are doing it wrong.

moviefreakedmind said:

yhwx said:

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/958168

It’s an ironically badly-constructed sentence.

You can think that, if it makes you feel better.

yhwx said:

This behavior is unacceptable. If we just keep going like this passively, Id will continue to do this stuff over and over.

We need to draw attention to this.

You are not very bright, aren’t you?

TV’s Frink said:

perhaps I just misread it.

Of course you did. I stand correct.

TV’s Frink said:

You edited your post.

I edited my post 20 minutes before you even made your post… go check the time stamps.

TV’s Frink said:

Seriously how could anyone think that problems make a situation less interesting? That’s like saying a movie was less interesting because things happened in it.

I said that all the problems make it at least slightly interesting, as opposed to being extremely boring when there aren’t any problems.

Olympics are extremely boring anyway. All the problems in Brazil make it at least slightly interesting.

Tyrphanax said:

“Hey you should really check out this one anime it’s really cool and really grown up for adults and…”

Well I liked it.

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

HansiG said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

imperialscum said:

I am stupid in general.

FTFY

FTFY

Well we can’t all be smart, I guess.

If you were smart you wouldn’t have to guess.

I guess so.

HansiG said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

imperialscum said:

I am stupid in general.

FTFY

FTFY

Well we can’t all be smart, I guess.

Tyrphanax said:

To be serious for a moment, I actually think that Superman is one of the worst and most boring superheroes ever created.

Superhero genre is boring in general.

It is humour when he does it to others, but when others do it to him he is seriously butthurt. That is Frink in a nutshell.

Sorry, no.

Frank your Majesty said:

imperialscum said:

Frank your Majesty said:

So there’s a technical aspect to architecture, just like there’s a technical aspect to acting, just not as big.

So what aspect of acting is technical and most importantly what is the objective measure for that aspect?

You should ask an acting teacher for this.

You have misjudged my question. I wasn’t asking because I wouldn’t know about it. I was just trying to make you back up your claims since you argued so confidently.

Frank your Majesty said:
I am not that arrogant to think I know…

Well funny because just a post ago you were exactly that.

darthrush said:

Once Again, surprisingly Impscum speaks the truth.

What do you mean surprisingly? It would be surprising if I didn’t speak the truth.

Frank your Majesty said:

So there’s a technical aspect to architecture, just like there’s a technical aspect to acting, just not as big.

So what aspect of acting is technical and most importantly what is the objective measure for that aspect?

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

Frank your Majesty said:

If there’s no way to objectively rate an actors performance, why are there acting schools? Why are there film schools?

Just because you can teach someone to do something that doesn’t automatically mean that you can also objectively evaluate whatever he/she does in the end. I can teach you how to make a pizza, despite not having an objective measure to evaluate the pizza quality.

Acting and film schools don’t give out grades or diplomas? Interesting.

They do but that doesn’t mean it was evaluated based on an objective measure. It just means it was a subjective evaluation.

Frank your Majesty said:

I get it now. Everyone is an expert on everything and all opinions are equally valid. So my opinion on how to build a bridge is just as important as the opinion of a professional architect, even if my design would collapse, but hey, in my opinion a bridge doesn’t need to be stable, it’s all subjective.

Unfortunately you don’t get it. Even if it is an subjective evaluation (because for a certain thing there is no objective measure) it doesn’t mean all subjective evaluations should have the same weight.

And your example is very bad. Design and statics are two different things. Former is completely subjective, while the latter has objective measures.

Frank your Majesty said:

If there’s no way to objectively rate an actors performance, why are there acting schools? Why are there film schools?

Just because you can teach someone to do something that doesn’t automatically mean that you can also objectively evaluate whatever he/she does in the end. I can teach you how to make a pizza, despite not having an objective measure to evaluate the pizza quality.

TV’s Frink said:

Come on, everyone knows it is impossible to be wrong in this discussion. There is an art to arguing on the internet and therefore the whole discussion is subjective. I don’t understand how you cannot get this through your head.

Okay. You are dismissed.

Frink, if you insist on being wrong, I guess I will just have to respect that.